| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
blairpoelman Addict


Joined: 12 Aug 2004 Posts: 595
|
Posted: Apr 12, 2005 8:18 am Post subject: Definition of "Slob" |
|
|
I've been one in the past, and depending on how easy it will be to clean up, I sometimes still am. But in regards to wakeboarding, I just don't know what this means. Can somebody explain what makes a trick "slob", or is it an actual move???
________
Medical marijuana card
Last edited by blairpoelman on Feb 25, 2011 1:21 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
BR_WB Wakeboarder.com Freak

Joined: 12 Jan 2003 Posts: 2850
|
Posted: Apr 12, 2005 8:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
| A "slob" is a grab. Which is when you use your front hand to grab the board on the toeside edge between your foot and the nose. Like a slob front to fake or a slob 5.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
colefooter Wakeboarder.com Freak

Joined: 22 Jun 2003 Posts: 3925 City: Fairborn, OH.
|
Posted: Apr 12, 2005 1:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Taken from www.slobgear.com
There is the slob grab.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
craiger Soul Rider

Joined: 03 Feb 2003 Posts: 498 City: Plano
|
Posted: Apr 12, 2005 1:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| For you "core" riders out there, why is slob an acceptable grab but tindy is not. I mean, skateboarders don't have any space between their front foot and the nose of the board, and from what I understand tindy is unacceptable because of that very reason. What up?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
blairpoelman Addict


Joined: 12 Aug 2004 Posts: 595
|
Posted: Apr 12, 2005 1:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It seems like a lame grab, unless it's in a spin or raley.
________
How To Roll Blunts
Last edited by blairpoelman on Mar 12, 2011 12:44 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
-=LoneStar=- Addict


Joined: 20 Nov 2004 Posts: 751
|
Posted: Apr 12, 2005 1:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Uh-oh! Brace yourselves for another grab legitimacy thread...
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
craiger Soul Rider

Joined: 03 Feb 2003 Posts: 498 City: Plano
|
Posted: Apr 12, 2005 1:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I didn't know there was such a thing as a lame grab.
I'm not trying to start something here, just looking for an answer from someone who can explain (because to me, it makes no sense whatsoever).
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
blairpoelman Addict


Joined: 12 Aug 2004 Posts: 595
|
Posted: Apr 12, 2005 1:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It makes no sense to me either.
Sorry for the lack of appropriate icons to indicate the sarcasm in my last post
________
General Motors South Africa
Last edited by blairpoelman on Feb 25, 2011 1:22 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
-=LoneStar=- Addict


Joined: 20 Nov 2004 Posts: 751
|
Posted: Apr 12, 2005 2:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
craiger,
There is not but have you ever heard the saying, "Let sleeping dogs lie?" Please don't mention gloves, shorts over wetsuits, I/O's, jet boats, water skiing, hydrofoiling, tubes, or tow vehicles without at least 500 ft-lbs of torque either.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
blairpoelman Addict


Joined: 12 Aug 2004 Posts: 595
|
Posted: Apr 12, 2005 2:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
As the initial poster of this thread, I apologize for this wasting people's time. This post should be ignored, as it has now reached the lameness level of an airchair post.
________
New Jersey Marijuana Dispensaries
Last edited by blairpoelman on Feb 25, 2011 1:22 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
craiger Soul Rider

Joined: 03 Feb 2003 Posts: 498 City: Plano
|
Posted: Apr 12, 2005 2:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Don't ignore the thread!! I'm sorry guys, but I really want to know the answer to this question. I understand all the things about gloves, shorts over wetsuits, I/O's, jet boats, water skiing, hydrofoiling, tubes, or tow vehicles without at least 500 ft-lbs of torque. But this slob grab being legitimate in wakeboarders eyes while tindy is not is a mystery to me.
C'mon you core riders, help me understand so I can sleep well tonight.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Maestro PityDaFool Who Posts This Much


Joined: 12 Jan 2003 Posts: 5252 City: Markham
|
Posted: Apr 12, 2005 2:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| craiger - I don't get it either. It makes no sense to me...
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cwaker4 Soul Rider

Joined: 09 Dec 2004 Posts: 465 City: Gilroy
|
Posted: Apr 12, 2005 3:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| i think the tindy is considered unacceptable because its kind of a half ass indy grab, while there is now way to half ass a slob, its just a less difficult grab.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
-=LoneStar=- Addict


Joined: 20 Nov 2004 Posts: 751
|
Posted: Apr 12, 2005 3:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
craiger,
Alright, in all seriousness: I *think* the "shame" attributed to a "tindy" grab is only because it is probably the easiest first grab that everyone does. There is a reason for this. You do a heelside air, you only let go with your rear hand (so there's no danger of getting pulled around), and you can just suck your legs up and hang your arm straight down...no tweaking, no particular balance requirements...hell, you could do a "heelside tindy air" accidentally as long as you get half a foot of air.
Of course, I don't give a rat's ass where someone grabs but that's where I *think* the "tindy shame" came from. Now, when people start saying stuff like, "Oh, that huge double up BS 3 is stupid because of the tindy grab," that's where all logic falls apart.
cwaker4,
By your logic, the slob is a half-assed mute.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
craiger Soul Rider

Joined: 03 Feb 2003 Posts: 498 City: Plano
|
Posted: Apr 12, 2005 3:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Lone Star, that makes total sense. Can that be the reason? I'll buy it unless someone comes up with something better.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
colefooter Wakeboarder.com Freak

Joined: 22 Jun 2003 Posts: 3925 City: Fairborn, OH.
|
Posted: Apr 12, 2005 3:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm pretty sure -=LoneStar=- nailed it.
I personally see a bit of a difference between a slob and a tindy though. Even though I don't really think one is harder than the other. The slob is right by the tail, and tindy is right outside the binding. I personally don't care as long as it's a grab in that direction it looks cool to me, but some people get really picky.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
electricsnow Wakeboarder.Commie


Joined: 12 Jan 2003 Posts: 1238 City: anytown, usa
|
Posted: Apr 12, 2005 10:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
actually, a true slob grab is just a mute grab on a frontside air. So like an indy and a frontside grab, mutes and slobs are direction specific (on a skateboard, at least...I believe snowboarding incorporates this stuff too).
So if you're doing your "stuff" right, there's no need to not grab in between your feet (or right against them) unless you're grabbing nose, tail, crail or nuclear. And with that said, there's no reason that a tindy should even exist of you're doing your grabs like this. Does that make sense? And I'm totally serious on that, because I"m not sure if this post was clear or not..it's almost 2 am, give me a freakin' break over here...
_________________ J.L.A. Is Snowboarding
_______________________________
These pretzels are making me thirsty.
_______________________________
::www.buttermag.com:::www.cassettewakeskates.com:: |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
blairpoelman Addict


Joined: 12 Aug 2004 Posts: 595
|
Posted: Apr 13, 2005 7:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
A slob is a mute. Why don't people call it a mute? I've been snowboarding for 16 years and still don't understand why the names of tricks change, when the grabs or tricks don't change.
Kind of like a switch FS 180 is really just a 1/2 cab.
________
MOTORCYCLE TIRES
Last edited by blairpoelman on Feb 25, 2011 1:22 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
stompin7s Soul Rider

Joined: 01 May 2003 Posts: 331 City: venice/ tallahassee
|
Posted: Apr 13, 2005 7:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
i read in an old wbm that its called "slob" because its a half ass mute grab...or i guess a sloppy or slob grab cause ur lazy or whatever...i thnk grabbing slob is more than exceptable on any heelside fs spin. or def slop fronts to fakie are hawt! for true slob fronts to fakie with tons of steeze check out thomas horrells from back in the day
_________________ "it is better to fail in originality than to succeed in imitation" |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
J_DOGG PityDaFool Who Posts This Much


Joined: 14 Jan 2003 Posts: 5088 City: New Hampshire
|
Posted: Apr 13, 2005 8:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
| -=LoneStar=- wrote: | craiger,
cwaker4,
By your logic, the slob is a half-assed mute. |
I agree with this 100%
I do half-assed mute/slob 3's all the time.
Slob is Slob cuz it's an easy grab.
Tindy is Tindy cuz it's lame.
_________________ PEACE
| Aubs wrote: | | J Dogg - I thought of you last night. |
"Everyone wants a bite, it don't happen over night"! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Stephan Guest
|
Posted: Apr 13, 2005 8:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
This all comes back to Bill McCaffrey saying it's not a legit grab because skaters can't do it ie. there's no way they can grab with their foot in the way. This was in WBM 3-4 years ago. Thanks for that Bill.
Honestly I could give a rats ass what a skateboarder thought of my grab. What about Chad Sharpe's huge HS Tindy glides, are those lame? Or the following, this is Rob Struharik doing a TS Tindy glide. Is this lame because it's a Tindy? I would argue that this Tindy is harder than an Indy in the same situation. The Vandall does huge HS Slob 5's and those are big poked out full of steeze spins lame? Besides isn't a Mute grab front hand between your feet?

|
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
9.32 KB |
| Viewed: |
23806 Time(s) |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
blairpoelman Addict


Joined: 12 Aug 2004 Posts: 595
|
Posted: Apr 13, 2005 9:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
slob, tindy, indy, mute, melon - I no longer care about any of these. The only style-tricks I care about now are the Fashion Air and the Crotch Grab.
I stand by my previous post. It was lame to ask this question, as this is going nowhere. Again, I apologize for wasting your time.
________
NEW MEXICO MARIJUANA DISPENSARY
Last edited by blairpoelman on Feb 25, 2011 1:22 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CRAMM Soul Rider

Joined: 27 Jan 2004 Posts: 422 City: The Woodlands
|
Posted: Apr 13, 2005 10:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
This is stupid
_________________ Texas Tige |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
blairpoelman Addict


Joined: 12 Aug 2004 Posts: 595
|
Posted: Apr 13, 2005 12:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I agree.
________
Vapir No2 Vaporizer
Last edited by blairpoelman on Feb 25, 2011 1:23 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Scott M Criminal


Joined: 19 Jul 2004 Posts: 75 City: Acton, ME
|
Posted: Apr 13, 2005 12:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
as long as it looks good a grabs a grab
_________________ Centurion Avalanche |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Wakebrad Ladies Man


Joined: 11 Dec 2003 Posts: 12257 City: Dallas
|
Posted: Apr 13, 2005 1:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
some people define wakeboarding grabs by the rotation of the spin. This is wakeboarder.com's definition. Where as wakeboarding mag has it simply by where you grab the board. I've always used the wakeboarding mag definition.
_________________ You have just entered the twilight zone. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
pooser Wakeboarder.com Freak

Joined: 13 Jan 2003 Posts: 4738
|
Posted: Apr 13, 2005 4:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| many tricks get lost in translation because not all wakeboarders surf, skate, and or snowboard. Those that do othere boardsports think that its pretty lame to come up with new names or wrong names for tricks. because of the different equipment used you get trick confusion like crails, nuclears, and seatbelts, frontside grabs and indys, and slob and mute grabs. basically the grabbing between the feet thing is more just style. grabs just outside the binding look lazy. basically the legitimacy of a grab is how sick it looks so if you grab tindy but add a sickass poke then i dont give a crap. its lazy grabs without a poke and without style that are looked down upon(this is why tindy is considered so bad) if you want to be anal about naming tricks correctly go ahead but youre in the wrong sport. you can make sure that you name everything correctly and call "nuclears" crails etc. but dont be an ass and say other people are wrong.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
electricsnow Wakeboarder.Commie


Joined: 12 Jan 2003 Posts: 1238 City: anytown, usa
|
Posted: Apr 14, 2005 8:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
HC, I basically agree with your post (though I personally hate tindys, but I won't punch you for doing one). Like you said, I think things are different because of the whole "lost in translation" comment. When you look back at some old snowboarding footie, they have long-ass boards with 12 inch stances, so it's not surprising that they're grabbing all over the place.
Add in the fact that a lot of people probably don't know their roots, and that's where even more misinformation comes into play. Sorry guys, but you can't believe everything you read in wakeboarding magazine. I could show you an issue from 1997 where they had a jibbing instructional and they tried to say that a backside slide was when your back faced the boat. There are also A LOT of grab errors througout the years. It's a nice little magazine to read and the early issues have given me fond memories, but unfortunately, you might have to do your own "research" if you want to know the truth.
And I have no Idea where that whole slob story came from. AGAIN, a slob is just a mute grab on a frontside air. So you grab each trick in the same spot, they're just direction dependant. And you can either grab all stinky right in between your feet, or you can do it tuck-knee style and have the ladies swoon (trust me). See, this is the damage incorrect information does through a ten year (or so, whatever) time span....
Blair, I don't have a definite answer to your question. I can only speculate and say that when all of these grabs weren't a given and there was still a lot of unknown waters in skating, it was probably a big deal to be able to do a trick both ways--frontside and backside. I guess one thing that might bring some perspective to the issue is the pool talk in "dogtown and z-boys" and how they'd talk about their curve of progression. Anyway, I can only assume that's why some grabs have two names, which are based on the direction of travel.
Finally, yes, chad's tindy glides are lame. And I would argue that a tuck-knee indy is more diffcult than a poked out tindy "in that situation."
wakebrad, I love your avatar!!!
_________________ J.L.A. Is Snowboarding
_______________________________
These pretzels are making me thirsty.
_______________________________
::www.buttermag.com:::www.cassettewakeskates.com:: |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
blairpoelman Addict


Joined: 12 Aug 2004 Posts: 595
|
Posted: Apr 14, 2005 9:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
I can see how there is confusion on backside / frontside, etc... the variables that define a "backside slide" are significantly different than those that define, say... a backside 180. Isn't a backside slide just a lipslide without the transition?
In reality, I don't think it really matters what something is called. All I know is Pete Rose was a junkie.
________
Roor Bong Pictures
Last edited by blairpoelman on Feb 25, 2011 1:23 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Stephan Guest
|
Posted: Apr 14, 2005 10:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Well then don't do the grab you think is lame. Like I said I don't care what any snowboarder or skater thinks of my sport. I don't feel that is required to make wakeboarding legitimate. I just don't understand what makes Chad's Tindy glides lame. It's a part of the board so grab it. Especially if it's a tough trick & looks tight. Indys are as easy as anything but they're legit, makes no sense to me. Whattya think of an oriental? You know a hoochie where you grab the TS edge between your boot & the nose? That is the most blaspheming trick there is huh?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Wakebrad Ladies Man


Joined: 11 Dec 2003 Posts: 12257 City: Dallas
|
Posted: Apr 14, 2005 11:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
wakebrad, I love your avatar!!!
|
haha thanks. Made it myself.
| Quote: |
Finally, yes, chad's tindy glides are lame.
|
I disagree. I think grabbing between the board and the toes is more stylish than between the feet in a lot of situations. "Slob" 3s look better than mute 3's to me. It just looks awkward that their hand has to reach all the way around their leg to grab the board. Between the feet and the tip looks more smooth and stylish to me. Personal opinion...
_________________ You have just entered the twilight zone. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
-=LoneStar=- Addict


Joined: 20 Nov 2004 Posts: 751
|
Posted: Apr 14, 2005 11:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
| electricsnow wrote: | I personally hate tindys
...
Finally, yes, chad's tindy glides are lame. |
Do you honestly think that you would have the same opinion if skateboarding and snowboarding had never exisited? What is your reasoning behind it? I don't think anyone would say that they look ugly unless they just look weird because they're used to other board sports. I don't think you can say it's because of difficulty. You mention a difficult variation of an indy but what about comparing a poked out tindy to a regular indy?
Anyway, here's my new and improved grab chart. Using this chart, there would be no tindy or slob (as used here in wakeboarding, without regard to spins). I feel that reaching across your body (in front or behind) might warrant special naming so I included special red zones and also opposite hand entries on the nose and tail. I have numbered the non-basic grabs so feel free to fill in the names. BTW, I'll leave the through-the-legs grabs to another chart. This one's busy enough as it is. I also realize that some of the numbered grabs might be impossible.

|
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
36.7 KB |
| Viewed: |
23525 Time(s) |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wakedude83 Soul Rider


Joined: 18 Mar 2004 Posts: 377 City: Fox Lake, IL
|
Posted: Apr 14, 2005 11:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
Here's my opinion on grab legitimacy: If you are trying to grab in a certain place, it's fine. If you are missing (like grabbing too far toward the nose on a melon grab), then it's not legit. Pretty simple.
_________________ www.ten-80.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ctipping Wakeboarder.com Freak

Joined: 14 Jan 2005 Posts: 3309 City: Vancouver
|
Posted: Apr 14, 2005 1:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
Uh-oh! Brace yourselves for another grab legitimacy thread...
|
psychic
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Liquid*Force*Rider Wakeboarder.com Freak


Joined: 26 Jan 2004 Posts: 3139 City: Okanagan Valley, B.C Canada
|
Posted: Apr 14, 2005 1:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
DON'T PULL A T-INDY
_________________ www.Crawlinbc.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|