| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
midwesty Wakeboarder.Commie

Joined: 25 Jun 2003 Posts: 1028 City: Vegas
|
Posted: May 05, 2004 4:30 pm Post subject: do nautiques have a "wakeplate" as part of the bal |
|
|
just curious if the only wake "accessory" is the ballast or if they have something that combines the 2
thanks
_________________ Cummins powered |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Bruky Guest
|
Posted: May 05, 2004 5:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
its the ballast. you wouldnt want a wake plate anyways, well in most cases. the moomba/supra wakeplate is great, but the malibu's wedge ruins the wake. the plate on the bu's are more of a gimmic than a real wake enhancing device. i hope you arent planning on buying a new nautique, because you need to do a LOT more research before an investment like that, my friend
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jon Wakeboarder.Commie


Joined: 12 Jan 2003 Posts: 1176
|
Posted: May 05, 2004 5:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Nautique has something called the hydro-gate on their SV-211. It acts the same as Tige's Taps system or Skiers Choice's wakeplate. Rather than making the wake bigger, it helps shape it.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
midwesty Wakeboarder.Commie

Joined: 25 Jun 2003 Posts: 1028 City: Vegas
|
Posted: May 05, 2004 6:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i c...as far as research i have done it....but the lady that owns the boat is "convinced" that there is a plate back there....i was pretty sure they only had ballast but then again i have seen much crazier chit out there
_________________ Cummins powered |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bruky Guest
|
Posted: May 05, 2004 6:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| what model boat, there are tons of nautiques out there...
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
midwesty Wakeboarder.Commie

Joined: 25 Jun 2003 Posts: 1028 City: Vegas
|
Posted: May 05, 2004 6:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
2001 super air nautique
_________________ Cummins powered |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bruky Guest
|
Posted: May 05, 2004 6:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| are you buying it? gotta love the super airs...
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
midwesty Wakeboarder.Commie

Joined: 25 Jun 2003 Posts: 1028 City: Vegas
|
Posted: May 05, 2004 6:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
yes...unless the lady REALLY misrepresents the condition of the boat it will be sold on saturday, but then again with my luck it will get sold underneath me
_________________ Cummins powered |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Wkerat Soul Rider

Joined: 29 Jan 2003 Posts: 317
|
Posted: May 05, 2004 6:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| It shoulsn't have a plate back there...They are all personal things as to if they work, like me, I have a wedge and love the way it shapes the wake, but on my friends GG Supra 2 if us hate it and one likes it...
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bruky Guest
|
Posted: May 05, 2004 6:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
awww... is this woman you are buying it from elderly? seems like that because of the use of the word "lady". if so, why is she selling it, or for that matter, why does she have it?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
billm Soul Rider


Joined: 13 Jan 2003 Posts: 476 City: TX
|
Posted: May 06, 2004 5:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
its the ballast. you wouldnt want a wake plate anyways, well in most cases. the moomba/supra wakeplate is great, but the malibu's wedge ruins the wake. the plate on the bu's are more of a gimmic than a real wake enhancing device. i hope you arent planning on buying a new nautique, because you need to do a LOT more research before an investment like that, my friend
_________________
|
are you kidding me ,the wedge is a gimmick and ruins the wake??how many Malibus properly weighted and with the wedges have you ridden??i own a Supra but know and ride on 4 different Malibus in my area ,too many time to count..we have used the wedge and laos not used it to see the difference..it makes a difference for sure and it definitly doesnt ruin the wake ..it slightly increases the size of the wake but mostly it makes the wake much harder and peakier..theres a noticable difference between using it and not using it..now maybe on the boat you were on was an older version of the wedge pre 02 before they made a newer one to better work on the Vlx with the sv23 hull which works better then the old wedghe on the diamond hull..
i understand why some would not like a harder peakier wake and chose not to use the wedge do to how they like their wake but it doesnt ruin the wake..
the only real negatives of the wedge is it makes the boat harder to turn especially in tight area liek a narrow river ,two it burns more gas do to the drag,and three they were breaking a lot last year and thats about it..
i love the wedge and it works...
_________________ "Thanks for Play'n"
Lata
Bill |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
billm Soul Rider


Joined: 13 Jan 2003 Posts: 476 City: TX
|
Posted: May 06, 2004 5:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
heres a pic of a wedged 02 malibu vlx if you can find something wrong with this wake let me know..its one of the best ive ever hit..

|
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
51.95 KB |
| Viewed: |
5938 Time(s) |
_________________ "Thanks for Play'n"
Lata
Bill |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
surfsup Outlaw

Joined: 30 Jan 2004 Posts: 118 City: Orlando
|
Posted: May 06, 2004 7:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Definitely no wake plate on a SAN. Perhaps she's referring to the tunable rudder or she's added an accessory to the boat....
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bruky Guest
|
Posted: May 06, 2004 5:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| i rode on an 01 vlx and a brand new 2004 lsv that was just purchased as a first time boats by my neighbors. that wake looks great, but the vlx wake i was on was just bad. it had the standard ballast full, and the wedge down, with 5 people in it. it was way washy with the wedge down, and it was still washy and unsupported feeling without the wedge down. i didnt like the boats wake, but thats preference, but i do know for sure that when the wedge was down, it didnt do anything noticable accept use up more gas. on the lsv, the stock ballast was full, and the wedge was down, and when we took the wedge off, the entire wake felt excactly the same, and i am a very picky rider. i know the boat wasnt weighted with any sacs, and only factory ballast, but the wake wasnt up to par with my friends mobius with the wedge down, the only other boat i have ridden behind that has a wedge and is non-malibu.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
watsoc Addict


Joined: 23 Feb 2004 Posts: 574 City: Anthem
|
Posted: May 07, 2004 5:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I just rode a Tige 21V Rider's Edition yesterday with the Taps system and it definately makes a huge difference. Not only did it increase the size of the wake but it made the wake more peaked and firmer. It is also pretty nice in that you can adapt the wake to the different types of riders that may be on the boat. I don't know about the SAN wedge but on the Tige with the Taps system it was pretty sweet.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ruune Wakeboarder.Commie


Joined: 19 Oct 2003 Posts: 1809 City: San Antonio & Austin, TX
|
Posted: May 07, 2004 6:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
thats right about the TAPS, plus you dont have just "up" and "down" settings. The best use I've found for it is to load up on weight and mess with the TAPS setting in order to actually shape the lip of the wake. Didnt know there was a 21v tho :p.
_________________ I eat Vegans. Medium-Rare.
American by birth, TEXAN by the grace of God.
Dyslexics of America UNTIE!!!
www.360wakeboard.com
www.texaswakeboarders.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
No0ne Criminal

Joined: 02 May 2003 Posts: 65
|
Posted: May 07, 2004 7:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
Sorry, but need to correct this for the sake of conversations.........................
I quote"....it slightly increases the size of the wake but mostly it makes the wake much harder and peakier."
"i understand why some would not like a harder peakier wake"
Just a little physical science teachers knowledge. Matter(atoms and stuff) can neither be created or destroyed, just rearranged (changed.. ie... water to gas to ice, etc,etc ...) and since water is still water when wakeboarding it cannot become "harder" than the water it is.. Plus not even sure peakier is a word, but I got the point (greater angle of water at wake). Just semantics or the bastardization of English
Have a nice day all.
_________________ When all else fails, Go Harder!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ruune Wakeboarder.Commie


Joined: 19 Oct 2003 Posts: 1809 City: San Antonio & Austin, TX
|
Posted: May 07, 2004 7:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
is still water when wakeboarding it cannot become "harder" than the water it is..
|
Thats both correct and incorrect. Water can only be as resistant to pressure as it gets when its just a water solution (remember, we're not riding in pure water here). Now, as we all know wakes get washy. This is due to air being mixed with the water, as it passes under the boat, through the fins, rudder, engine, or all of the above. Adjusting the angle of attack that a boat has as it passes through the water will not only change the shape of the wake, but change how the air is mixed with the water. For a visual cue, look at the propwash. So, the more aerated the water is, the "softer" it feels.
...and "peakier" is a word when you're comparing only two wakes. "More peaky" would be comparing 3 or more.
_________________ I eat Vegans. Medium-Rare.
American by birth, TEXAN by the grace of God.
Dyslexics of America UNTIE!!!
www.360wakeboard.com
www.texaswakeboarders.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
No0ne Criminal

Joined: 02 May 2003 Posts: 65
|
Posted: May 07, 2004 8:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
#1 Dictionary.com has no listing for the word "Peakier".
#2 On the web , the only definiton for "peakier" is "slightly ill, often looking pale", which has not to do with water or shapes!
#3 Water(one gram per milliliter, depending upon temp of water) is still water, whether it is mixed with bubbles or not, and water is not any less or more "harder" in either situation, but you ramp(wake) is not solid due to air(less dense than water, 1.239 milligrams per cubic centimeter), not that the water(more dense than air) is less hard or more hard. Water, unless minerals are added( ie... salt , etc...hence the ocean) will be the same density regardless of how much air you add!
You might want to think your thoughts through and do some research before you speak.
Once again semantics.
_________________ When all else fails, Go Harder!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
King of the Tigers Wakeboarder.Commie


Joined: 13 Jan 2003 Posts: 1416 City: Mesa, Az
|
Posted: May 07, 2004 11:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
NoOne, get off it dude.
The U.S. ski jump team uses a pool for their practices during the summer.
They start shooting air bubbles through the water before the jumper hits it to make the impact softer.
So, if a boat happened to add air bubbles to a wake through the hull design then the wake would in fact feel softer.
That is what this is about. I've personally been behind boats with "softer" and "harder" wakes.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
King of the Tigers Wakeboarder.Commie


Joined: 13 Jan 2003 Posts: 1416 City: Mesa, Az
|
Posted: May 07, 2004 11:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
sorry, double post
Last edited by King of the Tigers on May 07, 2004 3:45 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bruky Guest
|
Posted: May 07, 2004 2:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
THANK YOU KING OF THE TIGERS! this guy sounds like my biology teacher last year in 9th. she told all 6 of us wakeboarders in her class that it is physically impossible to do an air ralley, and come back into position to land. she did her own little experiment, and it failed. i went to the lake with 2 of my friends in that class, and we got video of me doing it from many angles. we ended up getting extra credit
what type of boat do you ride behind NoOne? i am just curious.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Phil Addict

Joined: 14 Jan 2003 Posts: 636 City: Chattanooga
|
Posted: May 07, 2004 5:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| NoOne................Your an idiot.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bruky Guest
|
Posted: May 07, 2004 8:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| idiot meaning you are dumb.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
oshensurfer PityDaFool Who Posts This Much


Joined: 14 Aug 2003 Posts: 6325
|
Posted: May 07, 2004 10:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dumb would imply he's an idiot.. HA! Too much edumacatied peeeple in this fred.
_________________ (insert funny chit here) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bruky Guest
|
Posted: May 07, 2004 10:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| huh?!?! you lost me dood!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MrBlean Wakeboarder.Commie


Joined: 09 Mar 2003 Posts: 1420 City: UK
|
Posted: May 08, 2004 3:36 am Post subject: Word war three? |
|
|
| No0ne wrote: | | Once again semantics. |
No, in this case, pedantics. We all know what was meant by peakier and harder.
They may not be "real" words or used in the correct context with respect to the laws of physics but give it 5 years and look in the dictionary again. Language is ever-changing and new words enter into common parlance and subsequently get added to dictionaries all the time.
_________________ Jeff |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bruky Guest
|
Posted: May 08, 2004 5:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
| werent some mass amount of words added to webster's dictionary this year?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|