| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
JustinBrower Newbie


Joined: 05 Jun 2003 Posts: 3 City: Batesville, MS
|
Posted: Jun 06, 2003 3:32 pm Post subject: SICK wake behind a tri-hull!! |
|
|
Yesterday, I was at our normal spot for boarding when this tri-hull boat, complete with tower goes by. We watched in amazement for like 15 minutes before we pulled up to him to ask about the boat. It was a 20' I/0 with a 350. He said he was using about 2100lbs. of ballast and the tower was custom made for the boat. His wake made my Mastercraft 190's look puny. I would never thought that a tri-hull boat could make wake like that. I didn't get a chance to ride behind it though.
I thought that the V-part of the hull is what made the wake. What gives? Why is his wake phatter than mine?? Is the tri-hull the secret to boarding on a budget??
_________________ Mastercraft 190 on steroids........ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
anti-shoobies Wakeboarder.Commie


Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 1725 City: Ghettoburg
|
Posted: Jun 06, 2003 3:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
There is a tri-star on our lake, too. It throws a bigger wake without any weight than my prostar throws without any weight. What gives!?
_________________ Ride harder...
www.CONCUSSEDTHREADZ.com
www.MIDWESTMILITIA.net |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JustinBrower Newbie


Joined: 05 Jun 2003 Posts: 3 City: Batesville, MS
|
Posted: Jun 06, 2003 4:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
not a tri-star, but a tri-HULL. Kinda like the one in this picture. I stole this picture from Ebay. Imagine this boat, just a little bigger, with a tower.

|
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
19.58 KB |
| Viewed: |
4269 Time(s) |
_________________ Mastercraft 190 on steroids........ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wakeboarder Addict

Joined: 24 Apr 2003 Posts: 702
|
Posted: Jun 06, 2003 4:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
2100lbs wouldn't sink that boat, the motor would push it but the boat couldn't hold that much, could it???
_________________ Theres a fine line between bravery and stupidity-Johnny Knoxville |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BIGMAC Wakeboarder.Commie


Joined: 15 Jan 2003 Posts: 1824 City: Russellville,AR
|
Posted: Jun 06, 2003 7:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| It's not the v but more of the way the back bottom of the hull is shaped. Notice that X2 and SAN are almost completly flat.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sportster4Tec Wakeboarder.Commie


Joined: 26 Apr 2003 Posts: 1237 City: Baton Rouge, LA
|
Posted: Jun 06, 2003 8:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
...wakeboarder he said kidna the shape of that boat. Do you think the guy would have a 350hp i/o with 2100 pounds in that thing? Nah i bet it was much bigger and nice... he was just kinda showing you what the hull looked like.
_________________ www.krookedminds.com
www.rukusbs.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
anti-shoobies Wakeboarder.Commie


Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 1725 City: Ghettoburg
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ralph Wakeboarder.Commie


Joined: 12 Jan 2003 Posts: 1144 City: Auckland, New Zealand
|
Posted: Jun 07, 2003 1:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You'll probably find the wake will be big but soft. My bayliner pumps out a big clean wake but it isn't as hard or solid as the VLX I have riden behind.

|
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
37.54 KB |
| Viewed: |
4077 Time(s) |
_________________ Niiiiiiiiice |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
grady Addict


Joined: 12 Jan 2003 Posts: 547 City: d-block
|
Posted: Jun 07, 2003 5:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ralph, it may b soft but thats a damn good lookin wake u got there
_________________ N.e.R. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|