| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
beasoldierprstn Addict


Joined: 31 May 2004 Posts: 508 City: Melbourne, not the australian one
|
Posted: Nov 11, 2004 12:07 pm Post subject: bi level question |
|
|
ok so the bi leve lis out..... and it looks wierd (in my opinion), what would happen if you took off the bottom piece of wood and just rode the top?

|
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
34.49 KB |
| Viewed: |
2775 Time(s) |
_________________ my new signature |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
beasoldierprstn Addict


Joined: 31 May 2004 Posts: 508 City: Melbourne, not the australian one
|
Posted: Nov 11, 2004 12:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
sorry i forgot to color in the far right part....
_________________ my new signature |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
colefooter Wakeboarder.com Freak

Joined: 22 Jun 2003 Posts: 3925 City: Fairborn, OH.
|
Posted: Nov 11, 2004 1:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
you could always try it, but im sure someone already has and i would of heard about it by now if it worked very well
i saw go for it!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Wakebrad Ladies Man


Joined: 11 Dec 2003 Posts: 12257 City: Dallas
|
Posted: Nov 11, 2004 1:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| It would seem to me that it would ride like a crappy regular concave... it would probably be very slow in the water because of the bends.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
pooser Wakeboarder.com Freak

Joined: 13 Jan 2003 Posts: 4738
|
Posted: Nov 11, 2004 4:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| it would ride like s#!+. kinda like trying to ride a regular skate deck. why would you even want to do that?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
colefooter Wakeboarder.com Freak

Joined: 22 Jun 2003 Posts: 3925 City: Fairborn, OH.
|
Posted: Nov 11, 2004 5:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| now if you grip tape the bottom part and try that it could be a different story, but i have never even seen a bi level in person so i have no idea
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
beasoldierprstn Addict


Joined: 31 May 2004 Posts: 508 City: Melbourne, not the australian one
|
Posted: Nov 11, 2004 6:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
the first time i saw the origional picture like 3 months ago, i thought the "top half" was the bi-level. i thought they put it ontop of a normal board to compare the differences. i didnt know they were attached until i saw a video of someone riding it. i probably sound like an idiot now... haha
_________________ my new signature |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
colefooter Wakeboarder.com Freak

Joined: 22 Jun 2003 Posts: 3925 City: Fairborn, OH.
|
Posted: Nov 11, 2004 7:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| beasoldierprstn, can i see the pic without the black stuff? I haven't really seen a close up on the bi level yet
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Elevation Wakeboarder.com Freak

Joined: 27 Jun 2003 Posts: 2748 City: Clarendon Hills
|
Posted: Nov 12, 2004 8:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
....

|
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
108.35 KB |
| Viewed: |
2713 Time(s) |

|
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
66.39 KB |
| Viewed: |
2713 Time(s) |
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
scott a Ladies Man


Joined: 13 Jan 2003 Posts: 9810
|
Posted: Nov 12, 2004 12:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
you wouldnt be able to cut at all with it. see how the edges are curved (concaved)? yeah uhh that wouldnt be so good for edging, especially for those of you who ride finless...
oh yeah, and putting griptape on the bottom of it wouldnt do anything.
_________________ www.TheLiquidPlayground.com
Integrity Wakeskates |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
colefooter Wakeboarder.com Freak

Joined: 22 Jun 2003 Posts: 3925 City: Fairborn, OH.
|
Posted: Nov 12, 2004 12:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Elevation, thank you
i guess we should just all try to ride it the way it is suppose to be ridden
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Elevation Wakeboarder.com Freak

Joined: 27 Jun 2003 Posts: 2748 City: Clarendon Hills
|
Posted: Nov 12, 2004 3:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
scott a, he meant putting grip tape on the top of the bottom deck.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DavidHoff Wakeboarder.Commie

Joined: 03 May 2004 Posts: 1855 City: Dallas
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Elevation Wakeboarder.com Freak

Joined: 27 Jun 2003 Posts: 2748 City: Clarendon Hills
|
Posted: Nov 12, 2004 3:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
actually i think its more like a normal flat deck, but yah i think it would work pretty well.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
colefooter Wakeboarder.com Freak

Joined: 22 Jun 2003 Posts: 3925 City: Fairborn, OH.
|
Posted: Nov 12, 2004 6:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| but then again i guarantee the bi level would be better than a regular flat deck or whatever it is
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
elyse Wakeboarder.Commie

Joined: 01 May 2004 Posts: 1261 City: Indianapolis
|
Posted: Nov 12, 2004 6:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
beasoldierprstn, I thought they were comparing them until this thread lol. i dont pay much attention to that kinda stuff. but then it makes sense because its the BI-level bi means 2 so yeah
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Phil Addict

Joined: 14 Jan 2003 Posts: 636 City: Chattanooga
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Phil Addict

Joined: 14 Jan 2003 Posts: 636 City: Chattanooga
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|