| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
DanB Newbie

Joined: 13 May 2004 Posts: 36 City: New Durham
|
Posted: Jun 30, 2004 9:16 am Post subject: Draft (depth to bottom of screw) in an inboard? |
|
|
May be getting a boat and putting it on a local lake. The area where the boat will be is in a shallow cove, and I'm worried about screwing up an inboard. Maybe an i/o is the only way to go here?!?
I can measure the depth this weekend. How deep is the average inboard (water to bottom of prop)?
Thanks! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
chaz28o Wakeboarder.Commie


Joined: 06 Jun 2004 Posts: 1479 City: East Contra Costa County
|
Posted: Jun 30, 2004 9:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
Typical inboards draft in about 2' of water (or less)
A wakeboard boat will draft a minimum of 2' and most are around 28"
An I/O will draft even deeper |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
T&T Outlaw


Joined: 07 May 2003 Posts: 192 City: Denver
|
Posted: Jun 30, 2004 9:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hell yes. My I/O skeg sits at about 3.5' to 4' below the water. A shallow ski boat is much better off in shallow water.
The good part of the I/O is that i can raise the outdrive above the bottom of the hull, but you can't run it that way. _________________ _______________________________________ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DanB Newbie

Joined: 13 May 2004 Posts: 36 City: New Durham
|
Posted: Jun 30, 2004 10:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
| But you can raise the I/O a decent amount when putting into a cove, no? Wouldn't it be higher (less deep) than the fixed inboard? Also, what would hurt the wallet harder when hitting bottom @ 2-5 MPH: a slightly raised i/o skeg/prop, or the inboard prop (bent shaft???) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
churchy PityDaFool Who Posts This Much


Joined: 25 Jan 2003 Posts: 5814 City: Boise, ID
|
Posted: Jun 30, 2004 10:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Go inboard. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
T&T Outlaw


Joined: 07 May 2003 Posts: 192 City: Denver
|
Posted: Jun 30, 2004 10:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
YEP, you can raise the inboard a little (usually about 20 degrees from vertical) and still run at full speed, any higher and you shouldn't engage the prop because the CV joints could blow out. I have run it in idle with the outdrive all the way up, but it isn't good at all, and if you try to give it any throttle, it makes a mess and will thrust the back of the boat down.
If you are just idling the boat and coasting into the cove, I would agree with you about the I/O, but any power or speed, you are much better off with an inboard. _________________ _______________________________________ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
NAW Wakeboarder.com Freak

Joined: 13 Jan 2003 Posts: 4295 City: Chicago-ish
|
Posted: Jun 30, 2004 11:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
what would hurt the wallet harder when hitting bottom @ 2-5 MPH:
|
I suppose it depends on what's on the bottom.
I know you could destroy every bit of underwater gear on an inboard and be out of pocket less than replacing an outdrive on an I/O. But that's what insurance is for anyway.
Another problem with lifting the outdrive for clearance, is you lose alot of your slow speed handling capability. Just my .02 _________________ www.MidwestMilitia.net |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
T&T Outlaw


Joined: 07 May 2003 Posts: 192 City: Denver
|
Posted: Jun 30, 2004 11:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
| NAW wrote: | | Quote: |
what would hurt the wallet harder when hitting bottom @ 2-5 MPH:
|
I suppose it depends on what's on the bottom.
I know you could destroy every bit of underwater gear on an inboard and be out of pocket less than replacing an outdrive on an I/O. But that's what insurance is for anyway.
Another problem with lifting the outdrive for clearance, is you lose alot of your slow speed handling capability. Just my .02 |
First part: Yep destroying an outdrive could cost you $6-8000 depending on the drive if you hit a solid rock. I hit one (caused the boat to stop instantly) and it cost me only $250 (I got lucky).
Second Part: From what I've experienced, you do loose some of your control, but don't loose much control. You can still steer in forward and reverse because you still control the direction of the thrust with an I/O vs. directing the thrust with a rudder in forward only with an inboard. It is still very easy to control. _________________ _______________________________________ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DanB Newbie

Joined: 13 May 2004 Posts: 36 City: New Durham
|
Posted: Jul 01, 2004 4:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
Would only need to raise the outdrive while coasting slowly into a small cove. Would definitely have enough control to reach the dock safely. The question remains... what gives me the most room between bottom of prop (or skeg), and the lake bottom? A fixed Inboard prop/rudder, or a raised outboard prop/skeg???
Thanks for all your help! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
T&T Outlaw


Joined: 07 May 2003 Posts: 192 City: Denver
|
Posted: Jul 01, 2004 5:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
It doesn't have an easy answer because it depends on the boat, but heres a quick generalized answer:
Raised outboard prop/skeg would be safest.
Keep in mind that with a deep-V hull the boat would sit lower in the water, so a shallow hull would be your best bet regardless of the drive.
Measure the total depth, because you may be able to get by with an inboard if that is what you desire. _________________ _______________________________________ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Partyb Wakeboarder.Commie

Joined: 12 Jan 2003 Posts: 1810 City: Lantana, FL
|
Posted: Jul 01, 2004 2:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yea, good point, the hull is the bigger issue. Inboard tow boats don't draw much water b/c basically the hulls are flat bottomed, as compared to your typical I/O boat (v hull) _________________ Check out https://www.facebook.com/darcizzleoffshore |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|