Wakeboarder Forum Index

 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   StatisticsStats   FavoritesFavorites   RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages  Log inLog in 
BlogsBlogs   

I/O VS direct drive, pros and cons?
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Wakeboarder Forum Index -> Wakeboard Boat General Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
WakeBoardingManiac
Addict
Addict


Joined: 12 Jan 2003
Posts: 914
City: Montréal

PostPosted: May 12, 2004 5:04 pm    Post subject: I/O VS direct drive, pros and cons? Reply with quote

Hi! Um, I was wondering... What are the differences between an I/O and a direct drive in terms of performance, stability, etc. (not just wakeboarding aspects, but just cruising and manoeuvrability aspects too) I need arguments to tell my father about how a direct drive is better, because we saw a few used ones, but he didn't see why he should pay 8000-10000$ more on a direct drive rather than on a I/O, so that's why I was wondering what I could say.

Thanks a lot! Your help is VERY appreciated =)

_________________
Now even tough I know there's NO one in here that lives anywhere near Montréal, if you ever feel like riding, just pm/e-mail/msn/whatever else me
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger
jflock2
Outlaw
Outlaw


Joined: 25 Nov 2003
Posts: 234
City: Atlanta

PostPosted: May 12, 2004 5:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

You need to test drive both - you'll be able to answer your own question after the test drive...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tony M.
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 01 Apr 2004
Posts: 8

PostPosted: May 12, 2004 6:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

direct drive boats
Pros:
1. Planes much faster than the I/O
2. Tracks much, much better
3. Just take a test drive and you will see that there is absolutely no comparision between a direct drive and a I/O boat.

Cons:
1. None
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jflock2
Outlaw
Outlaw


Joined: 25 Nov 2003
Posts: 234
City: Atlanta

PostPosted: May 12, 2004 6:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Tony M., my point exactly...

Test drive 'em, you'll see...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
WakeBoardingManiac
Addict
Addict


Joined: 12 Jan 2003
Posts: 914
City: Montréal

PostPosted: May 12, 2004 7:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Allright... I'll have to convince him to test drive a direct drive, but I doubt I'll be able to 0_o

Oh well, I tought he would never check used boats again, but he called some people tonight, so there is still hope! Thanks Cool

_________________
Now even tough I know there's NO one in here that lives anywhere near Montréal, if you ever feel like riding, just pm/e-mail/msn/whatever else me
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger
Bruky
Guest





PostPosted: May 12, 2004 7:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

keep on grinding man! you can do it!
Back to top
DCdave56
Wakeboarder.Commie
Wakeboarder.Commie


Joined: 17 Jul 2003
Posts: 1008
City: Central Cali

PostPosted: May 13, 2004 6:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

You really can't wakesurf behind an I/O. Trust me it sucks not being able to. Mad
_________________
Spread the stoke.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Leggester
PityDaFool Who Posts This Much
PityDaFool Who Posts This Much


Joined: 13 Jan 2003
Posts: 6961

PostPosted: May 13, 2004 7:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

"terms of performance, stability, etc. (not just wakeboarding aspects, but just cruising and manoeuvrability aspects too)"

You won't get a DD to out perform a similarly sized and motored I/O for cruising, handling chop, reverse control and quietness.

_________________
I'm hung like Einstein,
And smart as a horse!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Neognosis
Ladies Man
Ladies Man


Joined: 13 Jan 2003
Posts: 17617
City: Webster

PostPosted: May 13, 2004 8:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Leggester has a point, although I am not so sure about the quiteness part, that's debatable, I think.
_________________
I walk 47 miles of barb wire, I got a cobra snake for a necktie, a brand new house up on the road side, and it's made out of rattlesnake hide
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
mnwakeboarder
Outlaw
Outlaw


Joined: 07 Apr 2003
Posts: 167
City: Minneapolis, Ride in St. Cloud

PostPosted: May 13, 2004 8:53 am    Post subject: I/O Reply with quote

The thing that scared me away from inboards is the lack of protection of the prop/drive shaft and price. My lakes have several shallow areas where we have to trim up the i/o, we couldn't do that with an inboard. I would say performance wise though inboards are way better.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bmartin
Addict
Addict


Joined: 05 Feb 2003
Posts: 794

PostPosted: May 13, 2004 8:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think the advantages of DDs are often over sold. I have had both and am now in a v-drive. No doubt the DDs do track a lot straighter, are easier to maintain wakeboard speeds, and you can surf behind them...after that the pros are not as dramatic. If you compare a 20' I/O with a 20' DD both with the same engine, beam, and ballast, the planing speeds will be similar and the wake size will likely be similar (this is an overgeneralization which depends on hull design of both the DD and I/O). I/Os are a lot easier to drive at slow speeds and can handle rollers and chop a lot better and unless you are looking at a v-drive I think the interior is layed out better not having the engine in the middle. Also if you want to cruise - I/Os tend to have higher top end speeds than most DDs.

If you want to have a boat with many uses and you are not a serious wakeboarder, then I/Os are fine boats. If you want really solid pulls for wakeboading, then DDs are the ticket.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Neognosis
Ladies Man
Ladies Man


Joined: 13 Jan 2003
Posts: 17617
City: Webster

PostPosted: May 13, 2004 9:02 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:

20' I/O with a 20' DD both with the same engine, beam, and ballast, the planing speeds will be similar


Not in my experience. My DD gets on plane almost instantly, and both of our i/Os of the same size, nearly same engine, takes FOREVER to plane off. The I/o throws a better unweighted wake, too Shocked

I/o's are faster at the top end, though, no doubt about that.

I actually like the engine in the middle. We sit on the engine box, you don't have to sit next to anybody and have them touching them if you don't want, the engine is real easy to get to every side of.

It's all personal preference, I think.

I love my boat, but I sometimes wonder if I could have just saved 15K and gotten an I/O. But then again, I wakeboard for fun, not to win friends and money.

_________________
I walk 47 miles of barb wire, I got a cobra snake for a necktie, a brand new house up on the road side, and it's made out of rattlesnake hide
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Neognosis
Ladies Man
Ladies Man


Joined: 13 Jan 2003
Posts: 17617
City: Webster

PostPosted: May 13, 2004 9:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Oh yea, my dd definitely pulls better than any I/O we've ever tried. That's for sure. I mean, you drop the hammer and it GOES, no lag time like in a lot of I/O's.
_________________
I walk 47 miles of barb wire, I got a cobra snake for a necktie, a brand new house up on the road side, and it's made out of rattlesnake hide
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
srh00z
Outlaw
Outlaw


Joined: 09 Nov 2003
Posts: 128
City: Birmingham

PostPosted: May 13, 2004 9:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have had both, but I can't really compare apples to apples. Big difference b/t a 3.0L 4 cyl 18 foot runabout and a 20 foot Malibu with a 5.7 V8 with a tower. I don't have to adjust the speed much in the DD, and my friends used to pull the I/O all over the place, this changes the speed and the wake. I much prefer the DD.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Ruune
Wakeboarder.Commie
Wakeboarder.Commie


Joined: 19 Oct 2003
Posts: 1809
City: San Antonio & Austin, TX

PostPosted: May 13, 2004 9:40 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:

"terms of performance, stability, etc. (not just wakeboarding aspects, but just cruising and manoeuvrability aspects too)"

You won't get a DD to out perform a similarly sized and motored I/O for cruising, handling chop, reverse control and quietness.


that has more to do with hull design than driveline type, but for the sake of argument, you might want to go for a spin in any of the Tigés with the convex-V hull.

_________________
I eat Vegans. Medium-Rare.
American by birth, TEXAN by the grace of God.
Dyslexics of America UNTIE!!!
www.360wakeboard.com
www.texaswakeboarders.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Neognosis
Ladies Man
Ladies Man


Joined: 13 Jan 2003
Posts: 17617
City: Webster

PostPosted: May 13, 2004 9:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

My malibu has the same "convex-V" hull that Tige' hypes so much.(at least I don't see any "hook" when I look at the hull) Same with all the Moombas out ther with a Wakeplate. Tige is calling it "TAPS" and making out like it was their unique idea.

Marketing. But I don't mean to start THIS debate again.............

_________________
I walk 47 miles of barb wire, I got a cobra snake for a necktie, a brand new house up on the road side, and it's made out of rattlesnake hide
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Ruune
Wakeboarder.Commie
Wakeboarder.Commie


Joined: 19 Oct 2003
Posts: 1809
City: San Antonio & Austin, TX

PostPosted: May 13, 2004 9:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

LOL yeah... although I'm not referring to the lack of a "hook." What I'm referring to is the keel design is that of a deep-v, and how the hull curves upward as you move towards the transom... which IMHO is where Tigé should be focusing their marketing.
_________________
I eat Vegans. Medium-Rare.
American by birth, TEXAN by the grace of God.
Dyslexics of America UNTIE!!!
www.360wakeboard.com
www.texaswakeboarders.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Wakebrad
Ladies Man
Ladies Man


Joined: 11 Dec 2003
Posts: 12257
City: Dallas

PostPosted: May 13, 2004 10:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

DDs:

More consistent wake which is better for skiing and wakeboarding depending on the amount of weight. Planes faster. Turns much sharper. Holds speed better. Don't have to worry about getting chopped up by the prop. Wakesurfing. Better place to put on wakeboards/skies (platform). Many are designed for wakeboarding so you'll find compartments for fat sacks where as an i/o they'll just be lying around. Hold their value better.

I/Os:

Cut through chop better. Usually have more seating space. Much easier to navigate in reverse. Prop tilt for shallow areas. Price.

In my experience people with DDs take care of their boats better. They are usually performace skiiers/wakeboarders who know their stuff about boats rather than just some guy who wants a new boat and gets whatever the cheapest he can. That's something to take into consideration when looking for a used boat.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
jbelson
Soul Rider
Soul Rider


Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 275
City: North Hollywood

PostPosted: May 13, 2004 2:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I've been on on both, and everytime I've been on a DD that was a couple years old, we've had engine problems. Everytime! Getting towed in sucks.
My theory is engine placement. With the i/o and v-drives, the engine is in the back where it takes virtually no impact (unless you're getting air in the boat), whereas the DD is in the middle and subject to a lot more impact that loosens things up.
Just a theory mind you, but there has to be some explanation.

_________________
"I gotta have more cowbell"
Bruce Dickenson-Legendary Rock Producer
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mr. Mutt
Soul Rider
Soul Rider


Joined: 26 Aug 2003
Posts: 395
City: San Francisco

PostPosted: May 13, 2004 3:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm not a boat designer or anything, but here a logical train of thought (in my mind anyway) why a DD would get up and plane faster/better than an I/O.

When a DD is pushing a boat forward, the prop blade is angled slightly downward, meaning that there is a slight amount of upward push on the boat which in a sense "lifts" the boat out of the water as it pushes it forward. Hence it planes faster.

However, because it's the rudder and not the prop that steers a DD or V-drive boat, the axis about which the boat rotates when you turn it is further towards the stern than that of a I/O. This is because when a DD turns, the boat is actually "sliding" around in the turn, whereas an I/O is pushing the back of the boat around.

I could be off, but that seems to make sense to me...and my little world.

_________________
"Remember when I said I'd kill you last...I lied"
"Let off some steam, Bennett!"
"Gooooooo! Get to the choppa!"

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
salmon_tacos
Wakeboarder.Commie
Wakeboarder.Commie


Joined: 14 Jan 2003
Posts: 2498
City: Austin

PostPosted: May 13, 2004 5:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mr. Mutt,

I think you're right on about the planing and angled prop. The angled prop may also explain why a 220hp I/O can usually go faster than a 320hp inboard. In the I/O, you can adjust the trim so that the thrust aimed directly backward instead of wasting some of the thrust trying to push the boat out of the water against gravity.

The other planing advantage of a DD is that it has the engine in the middle for better weight distribution, i.e. it's less prone to bow rise than an I/O or v-drive.

If you trim an I/O all the way down, you get a similar effect to angled prop of the inboard since the prop axis actually goes beyond the horizontal. The effect is minimal though because the angle is minimal. You can, however, add a hydrofoil/stabilizer/plate/whatever to the outdrive and the effect will be amplified greatly.

_________________
We are wakeboarders and our culture is advanced beyond all that you can possibly comprehend with one hundred percent of your brain.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Nor*Cal
Ladies Man
Ladies Man


Joined: 12 Jan 2003
Posts: 9479
City: Sac

PostPosted: May 13, 2004 5:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Here's another post that discusses this issue.

http://forums.wakeboarder.com/viewtopic.php?p=298472#298472

_________________
If I agreed with you we would both be wrong.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
chavez
Ladies Man
Ladies Man


Joined: 22 Sep 2003
Posts: 27375
City: Roseville

PostPosted: May 13, 2004 6:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nor*Cal, there is probably more than 1.

TonyM wrote:

Cons:
1. None


Yea, right. There are tons of cons as listed above. BTW, my 25 foot boat (i/o) will blow the doors off of most boats in holeshot. Of course this could have something to do with the BIII outdrive connected to the 454 Mag, but I digress.

Honestly, this really boils down to the boats primary use.

Here is a great bit of information courtesy of Leggester:

leggester wrote:

What can you do with I/Os that you can't with an inboard?

1. Run it up on the beach and raise the motor

2. Run it in extremely choppy water and use the trim to be safe. ( inboards in storms can be a real bitch )

3. Trim it for wake size and shape ( the unfortunate part of an I/O )

4. Steer easily a low/docking speeds.

5. "Putz" around the lake and still maintain steerage. ( idle that is

Most of the other problems are due to an undersized motor ( standard with I/Os ). I have the largest that was available. I keep plane and even speeds from 18 through 26 with no problems. Also prop pitch is important. I run a 17", mainly due to being at high altitude, instead of the standard 23". No probs with WOT either.

I have 700 hours on the engine, alot of them towing skiers/boarders/foilers and god forbid tubers. I don't even change the oil but once a year. and haven't changed spark plugs in two years. ( I know, but I've always been bad on maintenance ) No tranny leaks, no oil leaks, starts first time everytime... ...

I think the problem with most I/O owners is they did not know what to get. Small motors, wrong size, badly propped can all contribute to bad performance and a maintenance wreck.

Don't get me wrong. I still get on the course behind inboards, it just wasn't for me. I've been in 8' waves on Powell in the main channel and not worried too much ( 4' waves for those that surf ) I'd never do that in an inboard.

_________________
Quote:
That's Mr. Gingermex to you a$$hole.


RIP MHL 04/25/1958 - 01/11/2006
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Blog Visit poster's website
Tony M.
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 01 Apr 2004
Posts: 8

PostPosted: May 14, 2004 9:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

chavez-y-chavez wrote:

Quote:
Yea, right. There are tons of cons as listed above. BTW, my 25 foot boat (i/o) will blow the doors off of most boats in holeshot. Of course this could have something to do with the BIII outdrive connected to the 454 Mag, but I digress.


Yea, most I/O boats stand straight up on the takeoff, while I plane out and jump up to 46 mph. Now, when they plane out....that's a different story.

If you want a boat mainly for waterskiing and wakeboarding, than there is absolutely no comparison between the I/O and DD boats. If you want to cruise around the lake really fast and beach your boat than get an I/O boat...personally, I don't care much about beaching my $50,000 boat.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Neognosis
Ladies Man
Ladies Man


Joined: 13 Jan 2003
Posts: 17617
City: Webster

PostPosted: May 14, 2004 9:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Most boats don't have doors.
_________________
I walk 47 miles of barb wire, I got a cobra snake for a necktie, a brand new house up on the road side, and it's made out of rattlesnake hide
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
chavez
Ladies Man
Ladies Man


Joined: 22 Sep 2003
Posts: 27375
City: Roseville

PostPosted: May 14, 2004 10:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

cameraboy, mine had one... it enclosed the bathroom. Mr. Green
_________________
Quote:
That's Mr. Gingermex to you a$$hole.


RIP MHL 04/25/1958 - 01/11/2006
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Blog Visit poster's website
tribal
Outlaw
Outlaw


Joined: 20 Feb 2003
Posts: 177
City: pemberton,bc

PostPosted: May 14, 2004 1:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Tony M wrote
Quote:
...personally, I don't care much about beaching my $50,000 boat.

That is why I own a cheap i/o.I'm here to shred not be part of some exclusive country club.That aside chavez-y-chavez has it right that most poor preformances i/o's are accused of are due to underpowering and wrong prop choice.Get at least a 5l and I think the advantages far outweigh the disadvantages.I know one thing I wouldn't be caught dead in the ocean in a dd but I feel totally comfortable in my 22' i/o.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Tony M.
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 01 Apr 2004
Posts: 8

PostPosted: May 14, 2004 5:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:

That is why I own a cheap i/o.I'm here to shred not be part of some exclusive country club.That aside chavez-y-chavez has it right that most poor preformances i/o's are accused of are due to underpowering and wrong prop choice.Get at least a 5l and I think the advantages far outweigh the disadvantages.I know one thing I wouldn't be caught dead in the ocean in a dd but I feel totally comfortable in my 22' i/o.


We never beached our $5,000 boat either. I grew up with an I/O boat and having any boat is better than not having any boat. Like some have said it all depends on what you are planning on using the boat for....You could not pay me to take my DD boat in the ocean, but that's not why I bought it. As long as we are having fun that's what matters.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bruky
Guest





PostPosted: May 14, 2004 5:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

man, even the thought of beaching our boat makes me cringe... Confused Shocked
Back to top
chavez
Ladies Man
Ladies Man


Joined: 22 Sep 2003
Posts: 27375
City: Roseville

PostPosted: May 17, 2004 7:43 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Beaching boats is all about what the shore condition is like. In Mead, people beach $150000 offshore boats all the time - but the beach is soft sand with no rocks to be found (at that location).

That being said - constant beaching will eventually take its toll on gelcoat.

_________________
Quote:
That's Mr. Gingermex to you a$$hole.


RIP MHL 04/25/1958 - 01/11/2006
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Blog Visit poster's website
Neognosis
Ladies Man
Ladies Man


Joined: 13 Jan 2003
Posts: 17617
City: Webster

PostPosted: May 17, 2004 7:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

My cousin beached the family boat once. Of course, he was going 15 mph at the time, and threw two people onto the beach from the open bow, but that's another story altogether. I suspect it was NOT by accident.
_________________
I walk 47 miles of barb wire, I got a cobra snake for a necktie, a brand new house up on the road side, and it's made out of rattlesnake hide
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Wakebrad
Ladies Man
Ladies Man


Joined: 11 Dec 2003
Posts: 12257
City: Dallas

PostPosted: May 17, 2004 8:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

haha cameraboy, that's awesome. I'd love to see 2 people get thrown on shore at 15mph. Assuming they landed in sand and had no major injuries.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
chavez
Ladies Man
Ladies Man


Joined: 22 Sep 2003
Posts: 27375
City: Roseville

PostPosted: May 17, 2004 9:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

cameraboy, bwhahahahhahahahahhahahah dude that is priceless!!!!! Laughing
_________________
Quote:
That's Mr. Gingermex to you a$$hole.


RIP MHL 04/25/1958 - 01/11/2006
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Blog Visit poster's website
Calabria man
Outlaw
Outlaw


Joined: 24 Nov 2003
Posts: 234
City: Fair Oaks, NOR CAL

PostPosted: May 17, 2004 1:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think a big reason to buy a DD or a V drive is safety. The prop is under the boat rather than just out the back. I have heard of some horror stories about people getting chewed up. A friend of mine was at the lake and there was a guy who was really drunk and fell off the back of the boat and just about got cut in half. It was a horrible accident.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bruky
Guest





PostPosted: May 17, 2004 1:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

i was just reading throught here, and i got my idea about what my big post will be on, then i get to the last post and Calabria Man took it! argh! use the safety issue on your dad though. that is always sure fire and all 4 of my friends that have used it have gotten v-drives, and one a dd Mr. Green

its fullproof.
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Wakeboarder Forum Index -> Wakeboard Boat General Discussion All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

Add To Favorites

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
             


Copyright © 2012 - Wakeboarding - Wakeboarder.com - All Right Reserved
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group