3-stage vs Continuous

Abooel · Posted: Feb 15, 2003 12:10 pm Post subject: 3-stage vs Continuous

If you have a relitively small wake, is a 3 stage rocker still a better idea than a Continuous, or would Continuous give you more boot in the air? I always thought 3-stage was always better for getting more air but after reading about rockers in February's Wakeboarding mag. I'm not to sure anymore. Confused

billm · Soul Rider Joined: 13 Jan 2003 Posts: 476 City: TX

Yes with a small wake a a 3stage rocker would give you extra boost off the wake..I think the HL Byerly ,Premier or some of the Origin boards have huge rockers ,biggest ones out..Id try those..

chubby · Soul Rider Joined: 13 Jan 2003 Posts: 487 City: NC

continuous is better fo small, non-wakeboard specific wakes

ghettolake415 · Posted: Feb 15, 2003 2:22 pm Post subject:

in the WBM buyers guide, it says that contiuos is better for smaller wakes. Confused

billm · Soul Rider Joined: 13 Jan 2003 Posts: 476 City: TX

well thats a bit confusuing with 3 stage having more pop and usually more rocker you would think it would be better to ride on smaller wakes with..I dissagree in logic of using a continuous for smaller wakes..Why does it say this is better???

ghettolake415 · Posted: Feb 15, 2003 4:36 pm Post subject:

i believe w/ continous u can u can use ur edge better????

Magellan · Soul Rider Joined: 14 Jan 2003 Posts: 255 City: AZ

The series with the most rocker is the Absolute03. It is a soft 3-stage..best of both worlds. The 140 has 3in of rocker.

slaydit · Posted: Feb 15, 2003 9:06 pm Post subject:

3stage.

-jey

quigglymaster · Posted: Feb 16, 2003 3:26 pm Post subject:

the buyers guide in wb mag said taht continuous r better for smaller wakes and that you want a skinnier board too i think. u should read that.

harenheadpaul · Posted: Feb 16, 2003 3:47 pm Post subject:

I am probably totally wrong, but a continuous might help clear the wakes for transition with as much air as possible