Wakeboarder Forum Index

 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   StatisticsStats   FavoritesFavorites   RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages  Log inLog in 
BlogsBlogs   

Bill Nye debates Ken Ham
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Wakeboarder Forum Index -> Non-Wakeboarding
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Okie Boarder
Ladies Man
Ladies Man


Joined: 03 Mar 2008
Posts: 10056
City: Edmond

PostPosted: Feb 05, 2014 5:31 pm    Post subject: Bill Nye debates Ken Ham Reply with quote

I heard about this last night and I'm just starting to watch it. Anyone already watch it? Thoughts?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z6kgvhG3AkI

_________________
If love is blind, why is lingerie so popular?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
jt09
Ladies Man
Ladies Man


Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Posts: 22083
City: Austin

PostPosted: Feb 06, 2014 6:28 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Okie Boarder
Ladies Man
Ladies Man


Joined: 03 Mar 2008
Posts: 10056
City: Edmond

PostPosted: Feb 06, 2014 6:43 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

It was an interesting debate. It seemed to me that Nye bounced around on a lot of different pieces of an overall thought, rather than focusing in on a few key elements. Seems like Ham did a better job of narrowing the scope of his points to try to answer the key question. Ham trued to evangelize too much rather than just discussing the facts of his research.

The point about inaccuracy of dating/aging caught my attention. I also was intrigued by the kind versus species points.

_________________
If love is blind, why is lingerie so popular?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
chavez
Ladies Man
Ladies Man


Joined: 22 Sep 2003
Posts: 27375
City: Roseville

PostPosted: Feb 06, 2014 7:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Okie Boarder, there is no slicing this any other way. What jt09 posted is BANG ON TRUTH.

Any deviation from that means the person debating that "viewpoint" is this guy:



There is ZERO middle ground.

_________________
Quote:
That's Mr. Gingermex to you a$$hole.


RIP MHL 04/25/1958 - 01/11/2006
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Blog Visit poster's website
GnarShredd
Wakeboarder.Commie
Wakeboarder.Commie


Joined: 16 Jun 2009
Posts: 2310
City: St Pete.

PostPosted: Feb 06, 2014 8:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

While I appreciate the attention being drawn to the matter, I don't like legitimizing people like Ham.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Okie Boarder
Ladies Man
Ladies Man


Joined: 03 Mar 2008
Posts: 10056
City: Edmond

PostPosted: Feb 06, 2014 10:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

So, evidence is not fact? That's your claim?
_________________
If love is blind, why is lingerie so popular?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
chavez
Ladies Man
Ladies Man


Joined: 22 Sep 2003
Posts: 27375
City: Roseville

PostPosted: Feb 06, 2014 10:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Fact: my unicorn god farts rainbows. What? You say I just made that ish up?

How dare you insult my beliefs. Rolling Eyes

_________________
Quote:
That's Mr. Gingermex to you a$$hole.


RIP MHL 04/25/1958 - 01/11/2006
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Blog Visit poster's website
Okie Boarder
Ladies Man
Ladies Man


Joined: 03 Mar 2008
Posts: 10056
City: Edmond

PostPosted: Feb 06, 2014 10:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

So that's a yes? Or a no? Can't quite tell.
_________________
If love is blind, why is lingerie so popular?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
wakeboarderdave1
Wakeboarder.com Freak
Wakeboarder.com Freak


Joined: 25 Apr 2005
Posts: 3161
City: St. Thomas, MO

PostPosted: Feb 06, 2014 11:19 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

chavez wrote:
Fact: VW engineers fart rainbows. What? You say I just made that ish up?

How dare you insult my beliefs. Rolling Eyes


FIFY

If it's in the bible it's fact. \thread

_________________
RIP DLS.

"When you've got that many stars on your hat, you're pretty good." - Keith Jackson
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Blog Visit poster's website
chavez
Ladies Man
Ladies Man


Joined: 22 Sep 2003
Posts: 27375
City: Roseville

PostPosted: Feb 06, 2014 1:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

There is no evidence to support Ham's claims. There is an overwheming amount of evidence to support Nye's.


I just wrapped up praying to the FSM. He manifested himself and I was touched by his noodly appendage. He then told me that HE created the earth yesterday and history is an illusion he created. He told me to pray in the name of the pasta, the sauce, and the holy meatball. Ramen.

_________________
Quote:
That's Mr. Gingermex to you a$$hole.


RIP MHL 04/25/1958 - 01/11/2006
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Blog Visit poster's website
Okie Boarder
Ladies Man
Ladies Man


Joined: 03 Mar 2008
Posts: 10056
City: Edmond

PostPosted: Feb 06, 2014 1:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

So, your answer is no. Evidence = fact as far as you are concerned.
_________________
If love is blind, why is lingerie so popular?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Okie Boarder
Ladies Man
Ladies Man


Joined: 03 Mar 2008
Posts: 10056
City: Edmond

PostPosted: Feb 06, 2014 1:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

There is plenty of evidence that supports the notion that creation is a reasonable theory. There is also plenty of evidence that supports other accounts in the Bible. I don't see where a person can assert that there is no evidence. It seemed to me that Ham touches on a few of those that he and his colleagues have studied, and he answered the question of the debate with enough information to back up a claim that creation is a viable option.

I can't say I agree that evidence = fact. I think it can lead one to believe that they have discovered a reasonable theory.

This whole notion that the matter of origins is settled and any other theories are rejected seems quite closed minded and doesn't seem very "scientific".

_________________
If love is blind, why is lingerie so popular?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
eeven73
PityDaFool Who Posts This Much
PityDaFool Who Posts This Much


Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Posts: 5377
City: Halfway

PostPosted: Feb 06, 2014 2:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Guys, Groundhog Day was earlier this week.
_________________
Is President Obama a Keynesian?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Okie Boarder
Ladies Man
Ladies Man


Joined: 03 Mar 2008
Posts: 10056
City: Edmond

PostPosted: Feb 06, 2014 2:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I agree...I wasn't intent on rehashing the same argument we've had many times. I've said what I wanted to say and I'll leave it at that.
_________________
If love is blind, why is lingerie so popular?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
chavez
Ladies Man
Ladies Man


Joined: 22 Sep 2003
Posts: 27375
City: Roseville

PostPosted: Feb 06, 2014 2:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Okie Boarder, there is no more evidence of creation than there is of my grandfather actually pulling a nickel out of my ear.


eeven73, why you gotta mess up troll feeding time? Mad

_________________
Quote:
That's Mr. Gingermex to you a$$hole.


RIP MHL 04/25/1958 - 01/11/2006
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Blog Visit poster's website
jt09
Ladies Man
Ladies Man


Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Posts: 22083
City: Austin

PostPosted: Feb 06, 2014 3:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Okie Boarder wrote:
There is plenty of evidence that supports the notion that creation is a reasonable theory.


no, there isn't. fables, tall tales and mythology aren't evidence.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jt09
Ladies Man
Ladies Man


Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Posts: 22083
City: Austin

PostPosted: Feb 06, 2014 3:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

i do love me some creationists though!







Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Okie Boarder
Ladies Man
Ladies Man


Joined: 03 Mar 2008
Posts: 10056
City: Edmond

PostPosted: Feb 06, 2014 3:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

jt09, chavez, did you watch the debate and/or have you read about the claims Ham or other creationists have made along with their supporting arguments?
_________________
If love is blind, why is lingerie so popular?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
RampageWake
Wakeboarder.Commie
Wakeboarder.Commie


Joined: 23 Jul 2003
Posts: 2002
City: Houston

PostPosted: Feb 06, 2014 3:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

God = Believe, then see.

Everything else = See, then believe.

_________________
Rhawn wrote:
You should have a less retarded friend read over your posts before you hit "Submit"

RIP M.H.Legge
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Chad H
PityDaFool Who Posts This Much
PityDaFool Who Posts This Much


Joined: 28 Jun 2004
Posts: 6449
City: Atlanta

PostPosted: Feb 06, 2014 3:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The problem with this whole damn argument is that the majority of creationists don't have a Bubb Rubbing clue what the evolution theory entails. Now when you compare that with anyone arguing for evolution, it's funny because everyone knows their side.

Funny thing about all this, the Pope has no problems with evolution besides the big bang aspect. And if you can't at least believe that, you need to go take a few college classes in biology and evolution.

"Currently, I see in Germany, but also in the United States, a somewhat fierce debate raging between so-called "creationism" and evolutionism, presented as though they were mutually exclusive alternatives: those who believe in the Creator would not be able to conceive of evolution, and those who instead support evolution would have to exclude God. This antithesis is absurd because, on the one hand, there are so many scientific proofs in favour of evolution which appears to be a reality we can see and which enriches our knowledge of life and being as such. But on the other, the doctrine of evolution does not answer every query, especially the great philosophical question: where does everything come from? And how did everything start which ultimately led to man? I believe this is of the utmost importance."-Pope Benedict XVI

Here's some more information, coming straight from a college level Evolution and Systematics class






I highlight few important parts on that last one Laughing

Just one more thing to add, I'd LOVE for someone to actually prove the theory wrong. I mean, it'd completely change every bit of biology on the earth. It'd be groundbreaking. The guy would win the nobel prize instantly if the research was true. If someone could prove evolution wrong, they'd be bigger than Darwin.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Okie Boarder
Ladies Man
Ladies Man


Joined: 03 Mar 2008
Posts: 10056
City: Edmond

PostPosted: Feb 06, 2014 4:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

By the way, jt, I love the particular images you selected and which ones you ignored. It's easy to shape a viewpoint when you exclude that which doesn't fit the image you are trying to portray.
_________________
If love is blind, why is lingerie so popular?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Okie Boarder
Ladies Man
Ladies Man


Joined: 03 Mar 2008
Posts: 10056
City: Edmond

PostPosted: Feb 06, 2014 4:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

RampageWake wrote:
God = Believe, then see.

Everything else = See, then believe.


No flaw in this logic. Laughing

_________________
If love is blind, why is lingerie so popular?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
jt09
Ladies Man
Ladies Man


Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Posts: 22083
City: Austin

PostPosted: Feb 06, 2014 4:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Okie Boarder wrote:
jt09, chavez, did you watch the debate and/or have you read about the claims Ham or other creationists have made along with their supporting arguments?


absolutely not. i'm not indulging any moron who thinks the earth is only 6000yrs old.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Okie Boarder
Ladies Man
Ladies Man


Joined: 03 Mar 2008
Posts: 10056
City: Edmond

PostPosted: Feb 06, 2014 4:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

So, if someone has a different theory than yours, they aren't worth your time? How open minded and tolerant of you.
_________________
If love is blind, why is lingerie so popular?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
jt09
Ladies Man
Ladies Man


Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Posts: 22083
City: Austin

PostPosted: Feb 06, 2014 4:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

only if the theory is ridiculous and impossible. keep believing in your fairly tale.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Okie Boarder
Ladies Man
Ladies Man


Joined: 03 Mar 2008
Posts: 10056
City: Edmond

PostPosted: Feb 06, 2014 4:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ridiculous and impossible? Like magic? Something from nothing? That kind of ridiculous and impossible?
_________________
If love is blind, why is lingerie so popular?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
E.J.
Ladies Man
Ladies Man


Joined: 15 Jan 2003
Posts: 7597
City: Mogadishu

PostPosted: Feb 06, 2014 7:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'd give my $.02, but I have 23 pregnancies to terminate tomorrow and then need to make a few 2nd Amendment Sandwich Boards to wear at the rally. We'll catch up at the vacation planning meeting, Mecca is going to be phuckin awesome!!!

P.S. Bonus points for anyone that can pinpoint how many sets of (2) animals I can get on my SAN when the big flood comes. (Clamshell will be filled with food and water, 3 adults & the LO)... (3 dogs, both mine are male...make that 4[assuming you choose dogs], they are neutered)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
senorbueno
Addict
Addict


Joined: 04 Mar 2005
Posts: 775

PostPosted: Feb 06, 2014 8:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Okie Boarder wrote:
By the way, jt, I love the particular images you selected and which ones you ignored. It's easy to shape a viewpoint when you exclude that which doesn't fit the image you are trying to portray.


Kinda like Ken Ham? He references the domestication of dogs early in the debate, referencing a study to support his argument. Problem is, it doesn't fit the whole earth started 6000 yrs ago argument, so he conveniently leaves that part out. This is taken directly from the abstract of the article he's referencing. Did he even read it?

"We narrow the plausible range for the date of initial dog domestication to an interval spanning 11–16 thousand years ago, predating the rise of agriculture."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
wakeboarderdave1
Wakeboarder.com Freak
Wakeboarder.com Freak


Joined: 25 Apr 2005
Posts: 3161
City: St. Thomas, MO

PostPosted: Feb 07, 2014 5:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Okie Boarder wrote:
By the way, jt, I love the particular images you selected and which ones you ignored. It's easy to shape a viewpoint when you exclude that which doesn't fit the image you are trying to portray.


Just like how you have ignored Chad H's post?

_________________
RIP DLS.

"When you've got that many stars on your hat, you're pretty good." - Keith Jackson
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Blog Visit poster's website
Okie Boarder
Ladies Man
Ladies Man


Joined: 03 Mar 2008
Posts: 10056
City: Edmond

PostPosted: Feb 07, 2014 5:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

senorbueno wrote:
Okie Boarder wrote:
By the way, jt, I love the particular images you selected and which ones you ignored. It's easy to shape a viewpoint when you exclude that which doesn't fit the image you are trying to portray.


Kinda like Ken Ham? He references the domestication of dogs early in the debate, referencing a study to support his argument. Problem is, it doesn't fit the whole earth started 6000 yrs ago argument, so he conveniently leaves that part out. This is taken directly from the abstract of the article he's referencing. Did he even read it?

"We narrow the plausible range for the date of initial dog domestication to an interval spanning 11–16 thousand years ago, predating the rise of agriculture."


Ham seemed to be trying to show a similarity to the report and his concept, rather than an attack of the person that wrote it on their stance or belief.

_________________
If love is blind, why is lingerie so popular?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
jt09
Ladies Man
Ladies Man


Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Posts: 22083
City: Austin

PostPosted: Feb 07, 2014 5:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Okie Boarder
Ladies Man
Ladies Man


Joined: 03 Mar 2008
Posts: 10056
City: Edmond

PostPosted: Feb 07, 2014 5:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

wakeboarderdave1 wrote:
Okie Boarder wrote:
By the way, jt, I love the particular images you selected and which ones you ignored. It's easy to shape a viewpoint when you exclude that which doesn't fit the image you are trying to portray.


Just like how you have ignored Chad H's post?


I ignored that with the intent for this thread to stay away from the same arguments we've already had. We can get into a copy and paste war and draw this out to pages and pages, but I don't really see the point in that.

_________________
If love is blind, why is lingerie so popular?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Okie Boarder
Ladies Man
Ladies Man


Joined: 03 Mar 2008
Posts: 10056
City: Edmond

PostPosted: Feb 07, 2014 5:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The bottom line is, Ham and Nye debated to try to show their position and answer the question about what is a viable explanation for origins of life.

I think Ham made a good case that creation is a viable option.

Y'all think there is no way creation is a viable option...it's just a fairy tale.

Does that pretty much sum it up?

_________________
If love is blind, why is lingerie so popular?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Okie Boarder
Ladies Man
Ladies Man


Joined: 03 Mar 2008
Posts: 10056
City: Edmond

PostPosted: Feb 07, 2014 6:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

jt09 wrote:


LOL!

It does. Read about tanniyn.

_________________
If love is blind, why is lingerie so popular?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Okie Boarder
Ladies Man
Ladies Man


Joined: 03 Mar 2008
Posts: 10056
City: Edmond

PostPosted: Feb 07, 2014 6:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

jt09, we can both play the "post a meme" game to try to attack the other person's position. You say you don't believe in magic or fairy tales?

How do you explain the big bang theory without magic?


_________________
If love is blind, why is lingerie so popular?


Last edited by Okie Boarder on Feb 07, 2014 6:53 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Wakeboarder Forum Index -> Non-Wakeboarding All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Page 1 of 5

Add To Favorites

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
             


Copyright © 2012 - Wakeboarding - Wakeboarder.com - All Right Reserved
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group