| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
M3Shark Newbie

Joined: 25 Aug 2007 Posts: 10 City: Bethesda
|
Posted: Jul 18, 2012 8:33 am Post subject: Need help finding a boat (strange requirements) |
|
|
Hi Everyone,
I am looking at replacing my current boat with a newer boat that is better designed for Wakeboarding.
Basic stuff is looking to spend 20-25K(willing to go up if needed to meet requirements below...), would prefer V-Drive, open bow, and a built in ballast system, newer than 2000.
Now the strange requirements...
Our lakefront property is located down a shallow stream/river from the main lake. This means that the boat must have as shallow a draft as possible when unweighted. Otherwise, we will hit rocks,trees,etc.
On the flip side, we also need to go under two bridges, one of them very low. So, it either needs to be towerless, or have a fairly easy to fold down tower. And, the max height from waterline to highest point on boat needs to be reasonable. (the lower the better, there have been summers wasted not being able to fit under one of the bridges...really sucks).
So essentially I need a boat with a shallow max draft and a reasonably low overall height. Any ideas/Suggestions? Am I just outta luck?
Thanks!
P.s: Having trouble even finding draft/height information on older boats, any ideas on where to get that sort of info? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
ridininmd Wakeboarder.Commie


Joined: 16 Feb 2006 Posts: 1231
|
Posted: Jul 18, 2012 8:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
| How shallow do you need to be? Most ski/wake boats are going to draft close to 2'. For the tower if you already can't make it under the bridge some of the time maybe look for something without a tower and get one of the old fly high pylons. There are some towers that fold pretty easily but I can't think of any that fold lower than the top of the windshield. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
vette74 Wakeboarder.Commie


Joined: 30 Jul 2003 Posts: 2144 City: Houston
|
Posted: Jul 18, 2012 8:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
I would go with a Sanger v210 they have probably the lowest overall height in the water of any recent boat. I think the draft of any boat will be about the same 22"-24" _________________ There'll be two dates on your tombstone/ And all your friends will read 'em/ But all that's gonna matter is that little dash between 'em... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
M3Shark Newbie

Joined: 25 Aug 2007 Posts: 10 City: Bethesda
|
Posted: Jul 18, 2012 8:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
| ridininmd wrote: | | How shallow do you need to be? |
As low as possible... I think out current boat is something like 18in. would prefer to try and go no more than a couple of inches deeper.
| ridininmd wrote: | | For the tower if you already can't make it under the bridge some of the time maybe look for something without a tower and get one of the old fly high pylons. There are some towers that fold pretty easily but I can't think of any that fold lower than the top of the windshield. |
Yeah, that's why I was thinking towerless. You can always remove the tower from a boat, correct? its kinda hard to find boats without towers, but with built in balast systems. Which tower in your mind is the easiest to fold up and down?
| vette74 wrote: | | I would go with a Sanger v210 they have probably the lowest overall height in the water of any recent boat. I think the draft of any boat will be about the same 22"-24" |
Yeah, I was just wondering if there were any unusually shallow boats out there...Will look into the Sanger V210s. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
anw7405 Outlaw

Joined: 10 Sep 2010 Posts: 188 City: edmond
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
M3Shark Newbie

Joined: 25 Aug 2007 Posts: 10 City: Bethesda
|
Posted: Jul 18, 2012 9:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hmmm... Love how easy it is to lower it. Do you know if it can get even lower without the bimini frame on the tower? Still seems to stick up quite a bit when its folded back.
Also, I know it would take tools, and more time, but can you just remove the whole top portion(or whole tower) off the boat? That way if we have a particularly wet year with a high lake we could just pull the whole thing off and use a pylon for the summer?
Its strange, some years (like this one) we have to worry about the boat
being too deep, others we have to worry about it being too high. Just all depends on how wet its been.
EDIT: Also, what year and on what models did sanger start using that type of tower?
thanks! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
NKCrider Wakeboarder.com Freak


Joined: 05 Apr 2008 Posts: 2644 City: NKC
|
Posted: Jul 18, 2012 9:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
is it shallow water under the bridges? fold the tower down and pump in the ballasts? _________________ Lanexa VA |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ridininmd Wakeboarder.Commie


Joined: 16 Feb 2006 Posts: 1231
|
Posted: Jul 18, 2012 9:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
Most of the towers in the years your going to be looking at come down pretty simply. I go out on a 2000 SAN 210 pretty often that we have to drop the tower on to go under a bridge. You spin two bolts out by hand and it folds forward, takes a few seconds. The real concern is going to be the height once it's folded, which is going to be tough to find without going out and measuring.
You can remove the tower entirely, if you need to while the water is really high. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
M3Shark Newbie

Joined: 25 Aug 2007 Posts: 10 City: Bethesda
|
Posted: Jul 18, 2012 10:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ok, was doing some more digging around online, and found a site that has at least some max draft data for older boats(boatdetails.com). According to it, the Tige 20v/22v has only a 1ft6in (18in draft) vs the 22-24 for the other popular wakeboard boats.
Can any one confirm that those number are correct? If so, then I think I found my boat...
thanks.
Also, the max draft measurement. Those are taken from the water line to the lowest point on the prop, correct? or is it just to the lowest point on the hull? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ridininmd Wakeboarder.Commie


Joined: 16 Feb 2006 Posts: 1231
|
Posted: Jul 18, 2012 11:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'd be careful with those numbers, it depends on how they measured it, with ships it is the lowest point of the hull, not necessarily the prop or rudder. Without knowing how they measured it and under what conditions, like full fuel, engine fluids, etc. the number doesn't mean a lot. That and the fact that your looking at a about 4 inch swing, well I wouldn't buy a boat off of that.
Tige` doesn't get much love and you may be fighting them come resale time. I think that under similar loads you're going to find most of these boats are with in a couple inches of each other in draft. If a couple of inches is going to make it get through or not get through then you better have good insurance because it's not cheap when you rip the gear off the bottom of an inboard. And it doesn't take nearly as hard of a hit to do it as a outboard or stern drive does. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ridininmd Wakeboarder.Commie


Joined: 16 Feb 2006 Posts: 1231
|
Posted: Jul 18, 2012 11:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
| you're not on Lake Jackson are you? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
carp22 Newbie

Joined: 01 Sep 2011 Posts: 36 City: great falls
|
Posted: Jul 18, 2012 11:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
| If you find a towerless boat, just put a monster tower on it, I dont know about the newer models, but the older monster towers fold completly flat, and a supposed to be easy and fast to put back up. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rmaytee Criminal


Joined: 30 Aug 2010 Posts: 54
|
Posted: Jul 18, 2012 11:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I thought wake pylons only fit on direct-drive models, since the center ski pylon is already like 3 feet tall? I like the monster idea above. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
M3Shark Newbie

Joined: 25 Aug 2007 Posts: 10 City: Bethesda
|
Posted: Jul 18, 2012 11:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
| ridininmd wrote: | | you're not on Lake Jackson are you? |
Nope. Wheres Lake Jackson?
I know its only a couple of inches...but that's all it takes to possibly hit,or not hit something. I really don't think that it will normally be a problem, this year is just about as bad as it gets. But has really got me worried about how deep a boat would sit.
So, the 22-24 that most people are saying its around...is that to the bottom of the prop or just hull? how much farther down does the prop of an inboard typically extend? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cadunkle Criminal

Joined: 16 Jul 2009 Posts: 60 City: NJ
|
Posted: Jul 18, 2012 12:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Prostar 190? Malibu Skier? I think you're pretty much looking at old light low freeboard ski boats to have little draft and height. Extended pylon and a coupe sacks. Or trailer. Maybe make friends upriver and take a smaller runabout up to get your real boat from their dock? Or resign to trailering? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
vette74 Wakeboarder.Commie


Joined: 30 Jul 2003 Posts: 2144 City: Houston
|
Posted: Jul 18, 2012 1:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
M3Shark, Bottom of prop. Why not just dig that area out a little deeper? _________________ There'll be two dates on your tombstone/ And all your friends will read 'em/ But all that's gonna matter is that little dash between 'em... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
M3Shark Newbie

Joined: 25 Aug 2007 Posts: 10 City: Bethesda
|
Posted: Jul 18, 2012 4:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
vette74, lol, I'm sure no one would notice or care that I'm doing it...
I think next time I go out I'm going to mount some poles off the back of the boat down around 24in below water line and see if I ever touch bottom or debris with them. If I can get through with those, then I will move them to 30in. If I can get by with those, especially this year when water level is so low, then I really have nothing to worry about. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ps205Rider Outlaw

Joined: 14 Jul 2012 Posts: 130
|
Posted: Jul 18, 2012 6:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
M3Shark, How far do you have to travel through the shallow water? Is it deep around the bridge?(enough that loading her with ballast prior to getting there will help the tower height issue?)
| ridininmd wrote: | | you're not on Lake Jackson are you? | Are you referring to Lake Jackson, in Georgia? That's where I ride... _________________ "It's just water..not concrete or dirt..just throw it!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ridininmd Wakeboarder.Commie


Joined: 16 Feb 2006 Posts: 1231
|
Posted: Jul 18, 2012 6:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Nah, it's in northern VA, close to where m3Shark is. It's a private lake that is really more of a river. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
anw7405 Outlaw

Joined: 10 Sep 2010 Posts: 188 City: edmond
|
Posted: Jul 19, 2012 6:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I've rode a tige 22v a few times and i doubt it has an 18 inch draft. It's a big, heavy, large freeboard boat. I think an 18 inch draft for this boat is false. If I'm asking the same question again sorry, but is the water shallow underneath the bridge? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
M3Shark Newbie

Joined: 25 Aug 2007 Posts: 10 City: Bethesda
|
Posted: Jul 19, 2012 6:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Ps205Rider wrote: | | M3Shark, How far do you have to travel through the shallow water? Is it deep around the bridge?(enough that loading her with ballast prior to getting there will help the tower height issue?) |
We travel through shallow water for quite a while.Not sure of actual distance, but around 10min at around 5mph.
getting under the bridge and bottoming out under it are somewhat separate issues.
If it is a year where we are worried about hitting the bottom, then we have plenty of room under bridge to fit a tower that does not fold completely flat. (We have about 14-16in above the windshield this year on our current boat...other years we can't even get under.)If we cant get under...then there is certainly plenty of water under the bridge to sink the boat with ballast. One of the reasons why I want a built in ballast system.
btw, our current boat is a 1987 Stingray SVC190 SS for reference. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
fish6942 Addict

Joined: 22 Feb 2006 Posts: 603
|
Posted: Jul 19, 2012 8:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
| If draft is that much of a concern, I'd stick with an I/O. With my setup (Centurion V-drive), the prop is the lowest point on the boat. I certainly wouldn't want to use the prop as my "min depth gauge". |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
anw7405 Outlaw

Joined: 10 Sep 2010 Posts: 188 City: edmond
|
Posted: Jul 19, 2012 8:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
| For what you are saying it screams sanger to me. The only thing is most of the sangers are on the west coast. Wait till winter and you can take your pick for everything you need and quite possibly stay under your budget. good luck. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
M3Shark Newbie

Joined: 25 Aug 2007 Posts: 10 City: Bethesda
|
Posted: Aug 13, 2012 12:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Should I be worried about maintaining a Sanger on the east coast... there isn't exactly a dealer down then street from me... What about getting parts for them?
Also, hows the wake on the Sanger V210's? How does it compare to other boats (for reference my favorite boat I have ever riddin behind was an early 00's Air Nautique team edition...)
Also Also, Any thoughts on a 2000/2001 X-starr (or 205V)? How high do they sit? there seem to be plenty of nice ones in my price range, and not hard to find relativity close to me. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Nor*Cal Ladies Man


Joined: 12 Jan 2003 Posts: 9479 City: Sac
|
Posted: Aug 14, 2012 9:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
M3Shark, they use mercruiser engines which are incredibly common in the boating world. _________________ If I agreed with you we would both be wrong. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|