Wakeboarder Forum Index

 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   StatisticsStats   FavoritesFavorites   RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages  Log inLog in 
BlogsBlogs   

your oppinions please

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Wakeboarder Forum Index -> General Wakeboarding Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
M`honri
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 23 Jan 2011
Posts: 21
City: Farr West

PostPosted: Jan 23, 2011 6:52 pm    Post subject: your oppinions please Reply with quote

I am going with the CWB DB9 this year and need your input on the only two options they offer....I am 5'10" 190 lbs
Do I get the 138 or the 144?
Thank you guys and gals!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
STANG KILLA SS
Wakeboarder.Commie
Wakeboarder.Commie


Joined: 16 Feb 2008
Posts: 2086
City: Killeen TX

PostPosted: Jan 23, 2011 7:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

138
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Chattwake
Wakeboarder.com Freak
Wakeboarder.com Freak


Joined: 01 Jul 2005
Posts: 4064
City: Chattanooga

PostPosted: Jan 23, 2011 7:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Depends on your riding style. I know many many people your size riding 141-144. A shorter board is a bit more maneuverable and ever so slightly lighter.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
M`honri
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 23 Jan 2011
Posts: 21
City: Farr West

PostPosted: Jan 23, 2011 7:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I am fairly new but I like to switch alot so I take the fins off and get some good air. I ride CWB 140 +/- 1 and love their stuff. I'm just needing the wakeboarders input on this the only two opptions that the DB9 has to offer....
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
kyle f
Addict
Addict


Joined: 14 Aug 2008
Posts: 835
City: Norris Lake

PostPosted: Jan 23, 2011 9:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

at 205 and 6' I like riding a Byerly 137 better than I did a 140. My suggestion would be the 138. Save some weight.... but consider you wil be lower in the water so technique will have to be done better.
_________________
Always looking for others who ride on Norris Lake in TN

MB Sports B52 V23 with 2750lbs of Ballast Capable Smile
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
shaggyboarder
Wakeboarder.Commie
Wakeboarder.Commie


Joined: 09 Nov 2004
Posts: 1631
City: ft. laud.... hook me up with a pull

PostPosted: Jan 23, 2011 10:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I would go bigger. Im only 5'8 160 and I like to ride 138-140. The bigger the board the softer the landings and more stable it will be. 138 will have a narrower stance as well. Too bad they dont make a 141/2 144 seems like a big jump from138.
_________________
Random Acts Of Dumbness Will Always Be Rewarded.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
LakeIolaLuke
Wakeboarder.com Freak
Wakeboarder.com Freak


Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 3064
City: Lake Iola/Orlando

PostPosted: Jan 24, 2011 8:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yeah that's a big gap in board sizes, But I'd ride the 144, and I'm only about 175. I won't really ride anything under 140.
_________________
buckthis wrote:
And another reason wakeboarding is better than surfing, you die less, that means you have another day to wakeboard, which is more fun than surfing anyway.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
The Heez
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 09 Aug 2010
Posts: 41

PostPosted: Jan 24, 2011 2:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

My buddy is about your size and rides the 144. I'm 5'8" 155 and I ride the 138. The nice thing about the DB9 is that despite the longer length you are still going to be on a very light weight board.

Not the best board to ride without fins, it has no other bottom features other than the center spine. If you want to make it looser get some smaller fins. I ride a .8 inch fin and it's awesome.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
M`honri
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 23 Jan 2011
Posts: 21
City: Farr West

PostPosted: Jan 24, 2011 3:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks for the input. Where would one get the .8" fins?
The funny thing is.. Many of the other big brand names, i.e. LF gives over 200 lb max weight requirements for almost all of their 136-38 boards. Alot of Hypers do and some of Ronix do. Just not CWB.... I like to be unpredictable on the wake with a 3 stage but I want to try an aggresive continuous rocker to see if I can pick up some speed coming across and poping.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
STANG KILLA SS
Wakeboarder.Commie
Wakeboarder.Commie


Joined: 16 Feb 2008
Posts: 2086
City: Killeen TX

PostPosted: Jan 24, 2011 7:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

what most of these guys dont realize is the DB9/Faction have a 17.8" mid section Shocked largest on the market by almost 1/2" Shocked
so they have a HUGE advantage in load carrying capability for there length. because they have a significantly larger surface area than a normal 138. probly near the same as a normal 142.

trust me on the 138 Wink

_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
3MileBayWaker
Soul Rider
Soul Rider


Joined: 14 Jan 2011
Posts: 256
City: Syracuse, NY

PostPosted: Jan 24, 2011 7:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'd go 138... But that is my own preference.
_________________
2010 Glastron GT 205XL ( Volvo 4.3L GL-J)
Low Profile Black Windshield
Roswell Wake Air Tower
2009 Liquid Force Trip 142/ 2008 CWB Answer
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
LakeIolaLuke
Wakeboarder.com Freak
Wakeboarder.com Freak


Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 3064
City: Lake Iola/Orlando

PostPosted: Jan 24, 2011 9:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It says on their site "up to 160 lbs" for the 138. And I think that most board co's are pretty generous with the weight caps on their specs.
_________________
buckthis wrote:
And another reason wakeboarding is better than surfing, you die less, that means you have another day to wakeboard, which is more fun than surfing anyway.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
shaggyboarder
Wakeboarder.Commie
Wakeboarder.Commie


Joined: 09 Nov 2004
Posts: 1631
City: ft. laud.... hook me up with a pull

PostPosted: Jan 25, 2011 10:18 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

STANG KILLA SS, I would take width into consideration but wouldnt replace length with it. They both make the board ride totally different but one doesnt make up for the other. cwb vibe for example is suppose to be an inch wider from tip to tail, and I still preferred the 142 over the 136. It really comes down to rider preference so in a sense everyone is right.
_________________
Random Acts Of Dumbness Will Always Be Rewarded.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
M`honri
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 23 Jan 2011
Posts: 21
City: Farr West

PostPosted: Jan 26, 2011 6:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I would jump on to a 140 or even a 142 but I am just not down with the 144... When you take my current 140 board and drop a few centimeters in length and add a few to the width I am almost certain I will love it. Besides the few centimeters in length that I will be losing only amounts to about 3/8 of an inch of length lost in the water at any given time if you consider you only ride one edge or the other... : )
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Wakeboarder Forum Index -> General Wakeboarding Discussion All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

Add To Favorites

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
             


Copyright © 2012 - Wakeboarding - Wakeboarder.com - All Right Reserved
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group