Wakeboarder Forum Index

 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   StatisticsStats   FavoritesFavorites   RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages  Log inLog in 
BlogsBlogs   

1988 Ski Nautique

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Wakeboarder Forum Index -> General Wakeboarding Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Bama_Wake
Criminal
Criminal


Joined: 03 Jun 2010
Posts: 77
City: Mobile

PostPosted: Jun 14, 2010 6:06 pm    Post subject: 1988 Ski Nautique Reply with quote

Just bought a 1988 Ski Nautique and I was just trying to get some info on what to do in order to get the best wake possible. I have been riding behind a 23 ft bay boat so im kinda clueless when it comes to wake/ski boats.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NKCrider
Wakeboarder.com Freak
Wakeboarder.com Freak


Joined: 05 Apr 2008
Posts: 2644
City: NKC

PostPosted: Jun 14, 2010 6:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

try the wakeboard boat section Wink lots of threads on this boat
_________________
Lanexa VA


Last edited by NKCrider on Jun 14, 2010 8:16 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
STANG KILLA SS
Wakeboarder.Commie
Wakeboarder.Commie


Joined: 16 Feb 2008
Posts: 2086
City: Killeen TX

PostPosted: Jun 14, 2010 7:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

i used two 250 lb sacks right beside the motor box made a killer wake.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mala1967
Outlaw
Outlaw


Joined: 04 Aug 2009
Posts: 155
City: Pepper Pike

PostPosted: Jun 14, 2010 7:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

More like 2 750 lbs sacks
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Bama_Wake
Criminal
Criminal


Joined: 03 Jun 2010
Posts: 77
City: Mobile

PostPosted: Jun 15, 2010 2:36 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Do I just need to buy sacks or is there some kind of pumping system I need to buy also?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
BrianABE
Outlaw
Outlaw


Joined: 01 Sep 2009
Posts: 210

PostPosted: Jun 15, 2010 5:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yes, you'll need a pump to fill the sacs. Look for a combo deal of two 750lb sacs with a pump.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address MSN Messenger
FlyZone CR
Wakeboarder.Commie
Wakeboarder.Commie


Joined: 25 May 2008
Posts: 1089
City: Nuevo Arenal, Costa Rica

PostPosted: Jun 15, 2010 5:27 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Congrats!
Check out www.the2001.com if you haven't already. www.correctcraftfan.com also has loads and loads of info on older nautiques.
I usually ride with 2 540's beside the engine.

_________________
FlyZone Wakeboarding Costa Rica
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
intotheflats
PityDaFool Who Posts This Much
PityDaFool Who Posts This Much


Joined: 31 Jan 2003
Posts: 5492
City: Port Clinton, Oh

PostPosted: Jun 15, 2010 5:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I had the exact same boat. I used a pair of 350# bags on each side of the engine and a 550# bag between the engine and the rear seat. The wake was pretty good with that set up. I tried a few different configurations but that seemed to be the best.
_________________
Does this rag smell like chloroform?

*2011 wakeboarder.com fantasy football champion*
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
FlyZone CR
Wakeboarder.Commie
Wakeboarder.Commie


Joined: 25 May 2008
Posts: 1089
City: Nuevo Arenal, Costa Rica

PostPosted: Jun 15, 2010 5:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

edit: double post, computer got stuck
_________________
FlyZone Wakeboarding Costa Rica


Last edited by FlyZone CR on Jun 15, 2010 5:41 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
intotheflats
PityDaFool Who Posts This Much
PityDaFool Who Posts This Much


Joined: 31 Jan 2003
Posts: 5492
City: Port Clinton, Oh

PostPosted: Jun 15, 2010 5:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Just to clarify, I had a pair of 350's total. 1 on each side of the engine. not a pair on each side. that prolly would sink the boat if you did that Laughing
_________________
Does this rag smell like chloroform?

*2011 wakeboarder.com fantasy football champion*
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
STANG KILLA SS
Wakeboarder.Commie
Wakeboarder.Commie


Joined: 16 Feb 2008
Posts: 2086
City: Killeen TX

PostPosted: Jun 15, 2010 6:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

mala1967 wrote:
More like 2 750 lbs sacks


LOL that would fill the entire hull of a SN2001 and sink it for sure.
adding 1500lbs to a 2300 boat with the tiny hull of the SN2001 is a recipe for disaster.
i put a pair of 440s in a few times, it was dificult not to submarine it. but managable

_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
intotheflats
PityDaFool Who Posts This Much
PityDaFool Who Posts This Much


Joined: 31 Jan 2003
Posts: 5492
City: Port Clinton, Oh

PostPosted: Jun 15, 2010 7:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

STANG KILLA SS, Im not sure it would sink it but it would definitely make for an interesting ride. My set up had 1250#'s and it put the platform right at water level. I think another 250# wouldn't make that much of a difference in wake size but would definitely make the boat handle like a turd.
_________________
Does this rag smell like chloroform?

*2011 wakeboarder.com fantasy football champion*
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Bama_Wake
Criminal
Criminal


Joined: 03 Jun 2010
Posts: 77
City: Mobile

PostPosted: Jun 15, 2010 9:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks for the info guys
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mala1967
Outlaw
Outlaw


Joined: 04 Aug 2009
Posts: 155
City: Pepper Pike

PostPosted: Jun 15, 2010 10:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

My bad I just saw it was a 1988 not a 1998 Nautique. I have a 1998 and the 750 sacs are perfect.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
STANG KILLA SS
Wakeboarder.Commie
Wakeboarder.Commie


Joined: 16 Feb 2008
Posts: 2086
City: Killeen TX

PostPosted: Jun 15, 2010 12:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

a ha. big difference in wet hull area. Laughing
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
FlyZone CR
Wakeboarder.Commie
Wakeboarder.Commie


Joined: 25 May 2008
Posts: 1089
City: Nuevo Arenal, Costa Rica

PostPosted: Jun 15, 2010 12:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

STANG KILLA SS wrote:
mala1967 wrote:
More like 2 750 lbs sacks


LOL that would fill the entire hull of a SN2001 and sink it for sure.
adding 1500lbs to a 2300 boat with the tiny hull of the SN2001 is a recipe for disaster.
i put a pair of 440s in a few times, it was dificult not to submarine it. but managable


I haven't tried it but I'm sure it's doable. Besides the 2 540's I have 90 lbs of lead in the bow, and I've driven with this configuration and 4 or 5 persons in the boat.
No need for submarining if you drive correctly.

_________________
FlyZone Wakeboarding Costa Rica
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
DogRiverRider
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 14 Jun 2010
Posts: 1
City: Mobile

PostPosted: Jun 15, 2010 7:33 pm    Post subject: g@y boy Reply with quote

man u g@y as h3ll that boats a piece off S**T Twisted Evil
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Wakeboarder Forum Index -> General Wakeboarding Discussion All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

Add To Favorites

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
             


Copyright © 2012 - Wakeboarding - Wakeboarder.com - All Right Reserved
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group