Wakeboarder Forum Index

 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   StatisticsStats   FavoritesFavorites   RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages  Log inLog in 
BlogsBlogs   

Court OKs sex between teachers, 18-year-olds

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Wakeboarder Forum Index -> Non-Wakeboarding
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Dragonlady8
Black Widow
Black Widow


Joined: 27 Aug 2004
Posts: 9198

PostPosted: Jan 14, 2009 8:53 am    Post subject: Court OKs sex between teachers, 18-year-olds Reply with quote

Your thoughts?

** Some people here are clearly not thinking this through.


Quote:
Court OKs sex between teachers, 18-year-olds
Washington judges: Law doesn't bar consensual sex with these students

The Associated Press
updated 9:04 a.m. ET, Wed., Jan. 14, 2009

SEATTLE - Washington state law does not bar teachers from having consensual sex with 18-year-old students, an appeals court ruled Tuesday in dismissing a case against a former high school choir teacher.

The teacher, Matthew Hirschfelder, was charged with first-degree sexual misconduct with a minor for allegedly having sex with a Hoquiam High School senior in 2006. He challenged a judge's refusal to dismiss his case, arguing the student wasn't a minor because she was 18.

Hirschfelder, who was 33 at the time, also denies any sexual relationship occurred.

A three-judge panel of the Washington Court of Appeals unanimously agreed that the case should be dismissed. While the law was written vaguely, a review of legislative history shows that lawmakers only intended to criminalize contact between teachers and 16- or 17-year-old students — not those over 18, the court said.

"The name of the statute is 'sexual misconduct with a minor,'" said Hirschfelder's attorney, Rob Hill, stressing that the state recognizes that an 18-year-old is no longer a minor.

The state's code of professional conduct for teachers still prohibits any sexual advance toward or contact with pupils, whatever their age, and teachers can be fired for it. Sexual contact with students younger than 16 is considered child rape or molestation; the age of consent in Washington is 16.

Appeal considered
Hirschfelder has not been able to work as a teacher since late 2006, when he was placed on administrative leave pending an investigation by the school board. He was arrested and charged in spring 2007, after a former choir student told police she had a monthslong affair with him that began shortly before she graduated.

His case did not go to trial because it was stayed pending the appeals court ruling, Hill said. He has been tuning pianos to make ends meet.

**Grays Harbor County Prosecutor Stew Menefee did not immediately return a call from The Associated Press, but he told The Daily World newspaper of Aberdeen that he would consider appealing to the state Supreme Court.

Some state legislators are set on changing the law. On Monday, six state representatives introduced legislation that would make it a crime punishable by a mandatory minimum of five years in prison for a teacher to have sex with a student up to age 21, as long as the teacher is five years older than the student and at the same school.
**

Rep. Larry Haler, R-Richland, the main sponsor of the bill, said he offered it at the request of the Richland School District, after a judge dropped a sexual misconduct charge against a Richland High School teacher because the teacher's alleged victim was 18.

"This is a real concern of mine, and with the court decision today, that just strengthens this bill," Haler said. "We need to protect our students as long as they're in our public schools, irrespective of age."

_________________
[quote="Swass"] 8824, dude - I suck. You were right.[/quote].
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
intotheflats
PityDaFool Who Posts This Much
PityDaFool Who Posts This Much


Joined: 31 Jan 2003
Posts: 5492
City: Port Clinton, Oh

PostPosted: Jan 14, 2009 9:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

As long as the student is of legal age, I don't think it should be against the law. Unethical...maybe, but criminal...definitely not.
_________________
Does this rag smell like chloroform?

*2011 wakeboarder.com fantasy football champion*
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
chavez
Ladies Man
Ladies Man


Joined: 22 Sep 2003
Posts: 27375
City: Roseville

PostPosted: Jan 14, 2009 9:09 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have to agree with ITF here. Certainly unethical. Absolutely not criminal.


The punishment for that conduct should be termination of employment (after due process). Nothing more.

_________________
Quote:
That's Mr. Gingermex to you a$$hole.


RIP MHL 04/25/1958 - 01/11/2006
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Blog Visit poster's website
ohsix
PityDaFool Who Posts This Much
PityDaFool Who Posts This Much


Joined: 12 Jan 2003
Posts: 6837

PostPosted: Jan 14, 2009 9:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

So sex for grades will only be legal for seniors? That's not fair to the other high schoolers.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Dragonlady8
Black Widow
Black Widow


Joined: 27 Aug 2004
Posts: 9198

PostPosted: Jan 14, 2009 9:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

If you read the **bold** it would include college students.
_________________
[quote="Swass"] 8824, dude - I suck. You were right.[/quote].
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
RampageWake
Wakeboarder.Commie
Wakeboarder.Commie


Joined: 23 Jul 2003
Posts: 2002
City: Houston

PostPosted: Jan 14, 2009 9:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Some state legislators are set on changing the law

No wonder our government never saw a financial storm brewing.
Oh well, if they can ban students f.ucking and truck nutz they will have made a great contribution to this country. Rolling Eyes

_________________
Rhawn wrote:
You should have a less retarded friend read over your posts before you hit "Submit"

RIP M.H.Legge
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Medina
Wakeboarder.Commie
Wakeboarder.Commie


Joined: 29 Sep 2008
Posts: 1269
City: Netherlands

PostPosted: Jan 14, 2009 12:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

intotheflats wrote:
As long as the student is of legal age, I don't think it should be against the law. Unethical...maybe, but criminal...definitely not.


Amen.

_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Blog Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Aubs
Motorboat Queen
Motorboat Queen


Joined: 12 Jan 2003
Posts: 9167

PostPosted: Jan 14, 2009 12:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

There was a high school senior (that graduated when I was a fresh. in college) that slept with one of the teachers. Once rumors went around that the teacher had slept with him, she was "asked to resign" and a long-term sub took her spot until the end of the year. Teachers are getting younger and younger. You can start teaching in CT at a high school as early as 22! A 4 year difference isn't that much!

As stated before, unethical: yes. Against the law: no.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
STPHNSN23
Guest





PostPosted: Jan 14, 2009 1:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
9A.44.093. Sexual misconduct with a minor in the first degree


(1) A person is guilty of sexual misconduct with a minor in the first degree when: (a) The person has, or knowingly causes another person under the age of eighteen to have, sexual intercourse with another person who is at least sixteen years old but less than eighteen years old and not married to the perpetrator, if the perpetrator is at least sixty months older than the victim, is in a significant relationship to the victim, and abuses a supervisory position within that relationship in order to engage in or cause another person under the age of eighteen to engage in sexual intercourse with the victim; (b) the person is a school employee who has, or knowingly causes another person under the age of eighteen to have, sexual intercourse with a registered student of the school who is at least sixteen years old and not married to the employee, if the employee is at least sixty months older than the student; or (c) the person is a foster parent who has, or knowingly causes another person under the age of eighteen to have, sexual intercourse with his or her foster child who is at least sixteen.

(2) Sexual misconduct with a minor in the first degree is a class C felony.

(3) For the purposes of this section, “school employee” means an employee of a common school defined in RCW 28A.150.020, or a grade kindergarten through twelve employee of a private school under chapter 28A.195 RCW, who is not enrolled as a student of the common school or private school.


interesting.
Back to top
Neognosis
Ladies Man
Ladies Man


Joined: 13 Jan 2003
Posts: 17617
City: Webster

PostPosted: Jan 14, 2009 2:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
I have to agree with ITF here. Certainly unethical. Absolutely not criminal.


The punishment for that conduct should be termination of employment (after due process). Nothing more.


With the exception that in college, you should be allowed to have sex with whoever you want.

_________________
I walk 47 miles of barb wire, I got a cobra snake for a necktie, a brand new house up on the road side, and it's made out of rattlesnake hide
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Craig-R
Wakeboarder.Commie
Wakeboarder.Commie


Joined: 19 Dec 2008
Posts: 1676

PostPosted: Jan 14, 2009 2:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

cameraboy wrote:
Quote:
I have to agree with ITF here. Certainly unethical. Absolutely not criminal.


The punishment for that conduct should be termination of employment (after due process). Nothing more.


With the exception that in college, you should be allowed to have sex with whoever you want.


it's still unethical if a student is having sex with a teacher to get an A. not that i wouldn't have had sex with some of my teachers in the past if given the chance Twisted Evil the english department at UM has some real foxes
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
intotheflats
PityDaFool Who Posts This Much
PityDaFool Who Posts This Much


Joined: 31 Jan 2003
Posts: 5492
City: Port Clinton, Oh

PostPosted: Jan 15, 2009 7:36 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

How would a student banging a teacher for a grade be any different from someone banging the boss for a promotion? I'm not saying that either is right as that is certainly not the case but I don't see much of a difference. If you have that low of an opinion of yourself to where you'd use your body to get better grades or a better job, go for it. The Gov't doesn't need to get involved unless they can somehow find a way to tax it Rolling Eyes

And I'd be willing to bet that most of the students, male or female, wouldn't be doing it for a grade. They'd be doing it to get laid. BUT, I'd bet that they would expect a little better grade than they earned after the dead was done.

_________________
Does this rag smell like chloroform?

*2011 wakeboarder.com fantasy football champion*
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Wakeboarder Forum Index -> Non-Wakeboarding All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

Add To Favorites

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
             


Copyright © 2012 - Wakeboarding - Wakeboarder.com - All Right Reserved
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group