View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
eeven73 PityDaFool Who Posts This Much
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Posts: 5377 City: Halfway
|
Posted: Apr 21, 2014 10:26 am Post subject: Gotta draw a line somewhere. |
|
|
http://www.oregonlive.com/portland/index.ssf/2014/04/twilight_room_annex_will_close.html
Cliffs Notes.
Bar fined $400,000.00 after requesting Transgender group the frequented the bar not return.
Bar Owners Version: Unruly group that make enviornment unwelcoming for other patrons. Bearded "women" with male gentalia insisting on using women's restrooms.
Transgender Group: We have been discriminated against. This made us depressed and we put on weight during said depression.
City of Portland: Pay up. _________________ Is President Obama a Keynesian? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
E.J. Ladies Man
Joined: 15 Jan 2003 Posts: 7597 City: Mogadishu
|
Posted: Apr 21, 2014 11:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
I just read that and didn't come away with your Cliff Notes.....
Bar Owner - Penner said he regrets what he said in the voicemail.
“I know I misspoke. I said a couple of stupid things without thinking,” Penner said. “Now I’m put out of business. Employees are out of work. I can’t have a checking account, and there’s absolutely nothing I can do about it.”
It appears he was frustrated that people thought he was running a gay/tranny bar, because every Friday night for 2 years, 25-40 of the Rose City T-Girls and their friends went there to party. Bar Owner didn't like that and ask them to not return.... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
goofyboy Wakeboarder.com Freak
Joined: 19 Jul 2004 Posts: 4463 City: Houston
|
Posted: Apr 21, 2014 11:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
this type of thing pissed me off to no end. It's his private business to run. He should not be forced by the city or any government to serve anyone he does not want to serve. _________________ Work SUX! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Okie Boarder Ladies Man
Joined: 03 Mar 2008 Posts: 10056 City: Edmond
|
Posted: Apr 21, 2014 11:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
I would agree with EJ on what conclusions you can come to with the article information.
Although it isn't clear in the article whether a disruption was a problem, if any group is disrupting a business and driving away other customers, there should be the ability for the business owner to decide which patrons they want in their establishment. _________________ If love is blind, why is lingerie so popular? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
goofyboy Wakeboarder.com Freak
Joined: 19 Jul 2004 Posts: 4463 City: Houston
|
Posted: Apr 21, 2014 11:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
They should be able to decide on any reason they want. They are a private business.
That said, any group they discriminate against, can picket, protest, etc. any private business that discrimnates against them. There is zero reason for the government to get into this guys business. _________________ Work SUX! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
E.J. Ladies Man
Joined: 15 Jan 2003 Posts: 7597 City: Mogadishu
|
Posted: Apr 21, 2014 11:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
Government puts all kinds of rules in place for private business, right? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
goofyboy Wakeboarder.com Freak
Joined: 19 Jul 2004 Posts: 4463 City: Houston
|
Posted: Apr 21, 2014 12:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
because we have allowed it. I disagree with it. _________________ Work SUX! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DRAGON88 Ladies Man
Joined: 12 Jan 2003 Posts: 8213 City: Portland, OR
|
Posted: Apr 21, 2014 4:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
goofyboy wrote: | They should be able to decide on any reason they want. They are a private business. |
I'm glad that hotels (Heart of Atlanta v. US) and restaurants (Katzenbach v. McClung), cannot not arbitrarily discriminate against african americans. To each their own though... _________________ wakeboards
wakeboarding |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jason_ssr Wakeboarder.com Freak
Joined: 13 Jan 2003 Posts: 4054 City: Dallas, Tx
|
Posted: Apr 21, 2014 5:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
DRAGON88 wrote: | goofyboy wrote: | They should be able to decide on any reason they want. They are a private business. |
I'm glad that hotels (Heart of Atlanta v. US) and restaurants (Katzenbach v. McClung), cannot not arbitrarily discriminate against african americans. To each their own though... |
Im glad they cant either, but I wish they couldn't because if they did we would all refuse to do any commerce there, rather than a federal law. The requirement of laws like this is an indicator of a society with no integrity. _________________ TONA
My avatar is NOT a pic of me! HAHA! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jgriffith Wakeboarder.Commie
Joined: 21 Mar 2012 Posts: 1454 City: Boerne
|
Posted: Apr 21, 2014 6:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
DRAGON88 wrote: | goofyboy wrote: | They should be able to decide on any reason they want. They are a private business. |
I'm glad that hotels (Heart of Atlanta v. US) and restaurants (Katzenbach v. McClung), cannot not arbitrarily discriminate against african americans. To each their own though... |
Not me, I would prefer that the court would only permit Congress to act upon the power given to them by the constitution |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DRAGON88 Ladies Man
Joined: 12 Jan 2003 Posts: 8213 City: Portland, OR
|
Posted: Apr 21, 2014 7:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
jgriffith wrote: | DRAGON88 wrote: | goofyboy wrote: | They should be able to decide on any reason they want. They are a private business. |
I'm glad that hotels (Heart of Atlanta v. US) and restaurants (Katzenbach v. McClung), cannot not arbitrarily discriminate against african americans. To each their own though... |
Not me, I would prefer that the court would only permit Congress to act upon the power given to them by the constitution |
I agree in some ways. I wish that those decisions were grounded in EPC doctrine (Kasenbach at least). But such is constitutional law. _________________ wakeboards
wakeboarding |
|
Back to top |
|
|
eeven73 PityDaFool Who Posts This Much
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Posts: 5377 City: Halfway
|
Posted: Apr 22, 2014 6:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
I was not making conclusions. I was giving the abreviated versions of the events by the parties involved,admittedly not only from the article I linked(easiest to access).
Frankly I have several issues with this situation not the least of which is the punishment fitting the crime. $400,000 it might as well be 400 billion. _________________ Is President Obama a Keynesian? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
frye Criminal
Joined: 08 Aug 2005 Posts: 86
|
Posted: Apr 22, 2014 7:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
jgriffith wrote: |
Not me, I would prefer that the court would only permit Congress to act upon the power given to them by the constitution |
LOL.
I think the only reason why the Feds can step in here is because he has a liquor license? Something about Mooselodge v. Iris comes to mind?? It's been a long time. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
eeven73 PityDaFool Who Posts This Much
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Posts: 5377 City: Halfway
|
Posted: Apr 22, 2014 7:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
It isn't a Fed action it is a State of Oregon action. _________________ Is President Obama a Keynesian? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jgriffith Wakeboarder.Commie
Joined: 21 Mar 2012 Posts: 1454 City: Boerne
|
Posted: Apr 22, 2014 8:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
eeven73 wrote: | It isn't a Fed action it is a State of Oregon action. |
I dont have a problem with it then. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|