| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
rickwetherald Newbie

Joined: 17 Sep 2011 Posts: 11 City: San Marcos
|
Posted: Sep 19, 2011 6:46 pm Post subject: Binding setup help |
|
|
Quick background:
I spent plenty of time riding back in high school, and am just now getting back into the sport 10+ years later. Back then, I always had bindings that were all rubber straps - next to nothing for adjustments, and you had to use shaving cream or dish soap to get your feet jammed in. Now, 10 years later, almost everything is lace up and infinitely more comfortable and easy to use.
Here's my problem - The first trip out using my buddy's board, I cinched the bindings down 'kinda' tight. They felt great until I nailed the requisite edge-catch-to-faceplant. My feet popped out, but the bindings were tight enough that I sprained my ankle a bit on the way out. Back in 'the day' the rubber bindings felt tight but would flex when your feet hit the eject button. So, my question is: Should I run the bindings looser so I don't get an ankle injury every time I crash hard (which is quite often right now), or should I crank them really tight so my feet don't come out at all? Seems sketchy from an injury standpoint, but then again I spent years living in Colorado with a snowboard locked down to my feet and that didn't seem too bad. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
TheHebrewHammer Addict

Joined: 03 Dec 2010 Posts: 526
|
Posted: Sep 19, 2011 7:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
There is no right answer on this one. It's personal preference. Whatever is good for your ankles tends to be bad for your knees. One joint or the other has to take the stress. Personally, I like to stay in my bindings on a hard fall rather than get ejected. _________________ rally to the wake |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ediotism Outlaw

Joined: 14 Sep 2011 Posts: 124
|
Posted: Sep 19, 2011 10:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| TheHebrewHammer wrote: | | There is no right answer on this one. It's personal preference. Whatever is good for your ankles tends to be bad for your knees. One joint or the other has to take the stress. Personally, I like to stay in my bindings on a hard fall rather than get ejected. |
same here. having your bindings stuck to your feet might mean some awkward knee sprains when you crash bad, but you're almost certain to be screwed when you land badly and have one foot come out of the binding - the board can really twist up your knee on the side that didn't come out.
with the common upper/lower laces systems nowadays, i prefer to have the bottom one just tight enough so that my feet dont slosh around in the binding. then i do the top one up as tight as i can - it doesn't seem to affect blood flow unlike the bottom laces.
rickwetherald were those bindings you tried open toed or closed? they make quite a bit of difference in comfort. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rickwetherald Newbie

Joined: 17 Sep 2011 Posts: 11 City: San Marcos
|
Posted: Sep 20, 2011 4:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
They are open toe - 08 LF Watson. I've read that ct is much better, but can't swing the $$ for new bindings right now; a new (used) board/binding/vest setup is straining my grad student budget as is. The few ot bindings I've ridden so far are light years ahead of my old bindings in terms of comfort and support, so I'm going to stick with them now.
I did make the 'mistake' of trying on some Ronix Franks in the shop the other day, and they certainly were awesome, at least as much as I could tell on dry land. I don't really think the Watsons will be holding back my riding at all, though, so I'm going to save $$ right now. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ediotism Outlaw

Joined: 14 Sep 2011 Posts: 124
|
Posted: Sep 20, 2011 6:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
open toes work fine, and the modern ones are indeed very comfy. the pros of opening toes are even better comfort and a bit of protection for your toes, but they're also a bit more limited in terms of range of feet sizes that can be accomodated.
don't think to yourself that you're being held back by open toe bindings, they can work just as well. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|