| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
SexyWS6Mama Outlaw


Joined: 28 Apr 2008 Posts: 150 City: Killeen
|
Posted: Jan 06, 2010 7:56 am Post subject: What Size Board is BEST for me? |
|
|
I weigh 150 lbs. and have been riding a 138 LF Melissa which I believe is
138cm: Mid 17.0", 2.4" rocker, riders 140-200 pounds.
I'm interested in the new 2010 Ronix Faith Hope Love wakeboard but the biggest size is 136 and they say
* Length 136 - Suitable for riders up to 175 lbs
I'm afraid to buy a board that is not going to make me progress. And I want to advance!!!!! What size should I get?
Would the ronix 136 work or would I be better off sticking with 138?
Thanks! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
pet575 Wakeboarder.com Freak


Joined: 20 Jun 2006 Posts: 3630 City: Kansas City, MO
|
Posted: Jan 06, 2010 8:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'd stick with the 136, unless you are near 6' in height. How tall are you?
The 138 might feel really big to spin if you aren't all that tall. _________________
| Wakebrad wrote: | | I honestly think it has to do with internet penetration... |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
beretta5spd Outlaw

Joined: 15 Nov 2009 Posts: 189 City: Nipawin,SK, Canada
|
Posted: Jan 06, 2010 8:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
That Ronix board will work great for you. All in all the board is only 2 cm shorter or roughly one inch shorter. You aren't going to find it that much different than the LF 138 in length. If you notice any difference, like was said above the 136 will make it a little bit easier to spin. _________________ Isaiah 43:2 --> When you pass through the waters, I will be with you; And through the rivers, they shall not overflow you.
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SexyWS6Mama Outlaw


Joined: 28 Apr 2008 Posts: 150 City: Killeen
|
Posted: Jan 06, 2010 8:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
| pet575 wrote: | I'd stick with the 136, unless you are near 6' in height. How tall are you?
The 138 might feel really big to spin if you aren't all that tall. |
I'm 5'7 and I would love to spin better! I mean all I can do is 180's now but was hoping to throw some 360's this year! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
pet575 Wakeboarder.com Freak


Joined: 20 Jun 2006 Posts: 3630 City: Kansas City, MO
|
Posted: Jan 06, 2010 10:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
beretta5spd, is right that it is only 1"+ of difference in length, but a 138 will also be a little wider as well. The 136 is going to be more manageable for you if you're working on spins. I'd go with that one. _________________
| Wakebrad wrote: | | I honestly think it has to do with internet penetration... |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SexyWS6Mama Outlaw


Joined: 28 Apr 2008 Posts: 150 City: Killeen
|
Posted: Jan 06, 2010 10:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
| pet575 wrote: | | beretta5spd, is right that it is only 1"+ of difference in length, but a 138 will also be a little wider as well. The 136 is going to be more manageable for you if you're working on spins. I'd go with that one. |
well spins, W2W and inverts Now is the 136 still a good board for me? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
beretta5spd Outlaw

Joined: 15 Nov 2009 Posts: 189 City: Nipawin,SK, Canada
|
Posted: Jan 06, 2010 11:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yes. _________________ Isaiah 43:2 --> When you pass through the waters, I will be with you; And through the rivers, they shall not overflow you.
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
HHI Dave Wakeboarder.com Freak


Joined: 10 Jun 2006 Posts: 2550 City: Hilton Head Island, SC
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Okie Boarder Ladies Man


Joined: 03 Mar 2008 Posts: 10056 City: Edmond
|
Posted: Jan 06, 2010 2:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Audrey, you're very similar in size to my wife. She rides a 136. She's not doing quite the amount of tricks you do, but the board seems to work well for her. I'd agree with the comments above.
Tell Cory he needs to take some pics of you in a bikini next to each of the boards and post them for us to make our final recommendation  _________________ If love is blind, why is lingerie so popular? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Medina Wakeboarder.Commie


Joined: 29 Sep 2008 Posts: 1269 City: Netherlands
|
Posted: Jan 07, 2010 3:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
Post a picture of you, maybe that helps in determing your board...
(Woops sorry)
To be honest with you, take a 138 - 140 board, its really nicer, to have a big board. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
NAW Wakeboarder.com Freak

Joined: 13 Jan 2003 Posts: 4295 City: Chicago-ish
|
Posted: Jan 07, 2010 6:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
I am in the bigger is better club. I think that you should ride the biggest board possible. IMO, it helps create more pop off the wake.
For reference, my wife is 5'4" and 120lbs and rides a 140cm board. Spins like a top. _________________ www.MidwestMilitia.net |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
beretta5spd Outlaw

Joined: 15 Nov 2009 Posts: 189 City: Nipawin,SK, Canada
|
Posted: Jan 07, 2010 6:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Medina wrote: | Post a picture of you, maybe that helps in determing your board...
(Woops sorry)
To be honest with you, take a 138 - 140 board, its really nicer, to have a big board. |
For tracking in rough water yes it's nice to have a bigger board.....but for attempting the tricks she wants to she's better off with a smaller board. Bigger board = heavier and more difficult to spin. _________________ Isaiah 43:2 --> When you pass through the waters, I will be with you; And through the rivers, they shall not overflow you.
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
beretta5spd Outlaw

Joined: 15 Nov 2009 Posts: 189 City: Nipawin,SK, Canada
|
Posted: Jan 07, 2010 6:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
| NAW wrote: | I am in the bigger is better club. I think that you should ride the biggest board possible. IMO, it helps create more pop off the wake.
For reference, my wife is 5'4" and 120lbs and rides a 140cm board. Spins like a top. |
I could be wrong but I always thought pop came from more rocker. I've rode longer boards with not much rocker and I thought the pop wasn't very good. Picture Chad Sharpe's covin model which has little rocker but it's a really fast board with edges that grab hard compared to Parks Bonifay's IBEX that's got the most rocker in the industry IMO. _________________ Isaiah 43:2 --> When you pass through the waters, I will be with you; And through the rivers, they shall not overflow you.
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
NAW Wakeboarder.com Freak

Joined: 13 Jan 2003 Posts: 4295 City: Chicago-ish
|
Posted: Jan 07, 2010 7:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
It's not just the amount of rocker, but the type of rocker as well....3 stage, continuous, blended, etc that will affect pop. Deciding what type of rocker suits your style of riding is totally personal preference. i.e., do you have a fast charging style into the flats vs. do you take your tricks wake to wake.
All things being equal, the bigger the board, the more surface area you have to generate pop off the wake.
However, in this case, I would tell the original poster to stick with her current set up. The LF Melissa is a good board and will not hinder progression in the least bit. For beginners, the board makes little difference, IMO. Boards don't hinder progression, your technique and/or athletic ability does.
The best way to advance is to ride as much as possible and seek some professional coaching. Go to the bus tours that come near your area in the summer, or take a vacation to a wakeboard camp, or take advantage of your local ride shops coaching sessions. _________________ www.MidwestMilitia.net |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
beretta5spd Outlaw

Joined: 15 Nov 2009 Posts: 189 City: Nipawin,SK, Canada
|
Posted: Jan 07, 2010 8:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
Very good answer NAW. On a totally different topic is there any fans of "The Office" here? Every time I see the topic of this thread all I can think of is when Jim comes in to work dressed up as Dwight and says "Which bear is best?" Dwight responds, "Grizzly." "FALSE, black bear is best," Jim comes back with. That episode ranks as one of the top episodes of that show IMO. _________________ Isaiah 43:2 --> When you pass through the waters, I will be with you; And through the rivers, they shall not overflow you.
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SexyWS6Mama Outlaw


Joined: 28 Apr 2008 Posts: 150 City: Killeen
|
Posted: Jan 07, 2010 10:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
Well nothing is wrong with my current Melissa board, I just thought maybe there was a board out there that may be better for me to advance.
Yes, I do take private lessons and attend wakeboarding camps during the summer.
I will probably just keep my 138 board but change bindings cause I want these Ronix Halo ones!
Thanks guys! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
inter Addict


Joined: 01 Sep 2006 Posts: 539 City: BC
|
Posted: Jan 07, 2010 10:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
beretta5spd, haha The Office is amazing. The Jim and Dwight rivalry is hilarious.
SexyWS6Mama, The 136 would be perfectly fine with you in my opinion. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SexyWS6Mama Outlaw


Joined: 28 Apr 2008 Posts: 150 City: Killeen
|
Posted: Jan 09, 2010 6:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I thought I had my mind made up, but I'm still deciding between
Keep 08 LF Melissa 138 with OT Wing bindings
or
Get 2010 Ronix Faith Hope Love 136 with CT bindings
Yes, I go W2W. So many choices and I don't want to make a bad one!!!!
I went to Ronix.com and looked at the specs for the Ronix FHL and honestly I don't know how to read them. I can't even tell if it's a beginner, immediate or advance board. Can anyone help? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
OuachitaWaker Addict

Joined: 16 Sep 2006 Posts: 577 City: Hot Springs
|
Posted: Jan 09, 2010 11:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| as much as you would like to hear it, a 136 will not make you more able to do any trick better than what you can already |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
STANG KILLA SS Wakeboarder.Commie


Joined: 16 Feb 2008 Posts: 2086 City: Killeen TX
|
Posted: Jan 10, 2010 8:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
| NAW wrote: | | I am in the bigger is better club. |
as am i. there is alot that goes into pop. but there is also simple physics at work in wakeboarding. more surface area will simply give you more lift off the wake.
a shorter, narrow board at the same riding speed and rider weight, will generally sit lower in the water, and cut threw the wake more. as apposed to a larger board sitting higher and planing on top of the ramp of the wake.
especially at lower riding speeds (we ride at 20.7) the larger area will be more noticable. now you could go to a smaller board, and compinsate for the loss of surface area with speed. the added force on the board will act like a larger board at slower speeds. ie compinsate.
and for the guy that said a larger board is heavier that is not the case (always). check out my slingshot thread where ive weighed alot of boards. take a standard contruction 138 and a 142 SS or company board for instance. the 142 is overall lighter AND much less swing weight with more surface area to boot. so generalizing that a larger board is always heavier isnt really an accurate statement.
as for audreys case im torn. her current setup is really killer and light. and of course doesnt cost anything.
but new gear is always cool and gets you amped. but you never know if it will suit your liking, helping or hurting(or just disliking for your style)
kind of what happened to me with the shanes, paid big bucks for my first pair of pro bindings, CT to boot, and got them and just didnt like them at all. sucks to throw the money away, but you dont know if you dont try them. they could have been awesome or they could be a waste and collect dust. without a place to demo stuff theres only one way to find out. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SexyWS6Mama Outlaw


Joined: 28 Apr 2008 Posts: 150 City: Killeen
|
Posted: Feb 01, 2010 2:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I'm for sure getting the 2010 Ronix CT Faith Hope bindings...........haven't made a final decision on the board. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Okie Boarder Ladies Man


Joined: 03 Mar 2008 Posts: 10056 City: Edmond
|
Posted: Feb 01, 2010 2:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
When are you two gonna come up to OK and ride the new bindings and possibly the new board?  _________________ If love is blind, why is lingerie so popular? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
justin h. Outlaw

Joined: 07 Nov 2003 Posts: 117 City: Katy
|
Posted: Feb 02, 2010 8:18 am Post subject: pop/rocker |
|
|
More rocker=More drag. More drag will allow you to load a larger wedge of water between you and the boat at the base of the wake. A bigger wedge will give you a steeper vertical lift. The down side to more rocker is that will definately slow you down your crossing speed into the wake and if you come off edge there is no coast. (You really need to find a balance that works for you)
More surface area (a bigger board) will give you more "raw" pop. When the wake pushes you the board's surface area will make is resist more.
More rocker=More pop when you edge all the way through the wake and load-up the line.
Bigger board=More pop all of the time. _________________ "Captain of Her Heart"
http://www.wakepics.com/view_single.php?medid=12968 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
justin h. Outlaw

Joined: 07 Nov 2003 Posts: 117 City: Katy
|
Posted: Feb 02, 2010 8:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
All that said, The Faith Hope board is a slick looking board. At 5-7 150 it will neither be too big or too small. Not knowing anything about your riding I would say that a 135-138 (in a standard width 16-17 wide) would be ideal.
If you wanted to go to bigger board, it probably would not hurt you, but much smaller <132 would not be a good move. _________________ "Captain of Her Heart"
http://www.wakepics.com/view_single.php?medid=12968 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|