| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| 99 wakesetter, 2000 mobius, or 2003 outback |
| 99 wakesetter lx |
|
25% |
[ 1 ] |
| 2000 mobius sk |
|
25% |
[ 1 ] |
| 03 outback ls |
|
50% |
[ 2 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 4 |
|
| Author |
Message |
t45lax Newbie

Joined: 10 Sep 2008 Posts: 7
|
Posted: Sep 10, 2008 5:48 pm Post subject: 1999 wakesetter Vlx vs wakesetter lx |
|
|
Disregard the poll
I'm getting a boat next week and I am down to 2 options. Both are 1999 wakesetters, one is the v-drive and the other is direct drive with ballast and wedge. Which will throw a better wake?
(the V drive will cost me an exta 3000 and has 450 hours vs 280) Which would you reccomend getting?
Thanks
Last edited by t45lax on Sep 11, 2008 10:21 pm; edited 3 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
t45lax Newbie

Joined: 10 Sep 2008 Posts: 7
|
Posted: Sep 10, 2008 5:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| any diff in hull design too? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Juice75 Outlaw


Joined: 09 Jul 2004 Posts: 218 City: Austin
|
Posted: Sep 30, 2008 10:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
The two hulls are the same. So if weighted the same, both should have a similar wake. The main difference is that it is easier to hit ballast in the v-drive. I actually have a 99 Sunsetter VLX (same as the Wakesetter, just didn't come with a tower and such), and I have 1300 lbs, fully auto fill/empty, all hidden.
I personally would go with the v-drive. The wrap around seating blows away having a motor in the middle of the boat. And just an FYI, the 99 Sunsetter/Wakesetter VLX is the same hull that was used all the way through the 2004 Wakesetter VLX. _________________ "You know what those things can do? Suck the paint off your house and give your family a permanent orange afro." |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|