| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Dragonlady8 Black Widow


Joined: 27 Aug 2004 Posts: 9198
|
Posted: Feb 06, 2008 7:32 pm Post subject: Heavy cell phone use tied to poor sperm quality |
|
|
So yak away Boys......
Heavy cell phone use tied to poor sperm quality
Men who talked more than 4 hours a day had lowest counts, study says
Reuters
updated 1:48 p.m. ET, Wed., Feb. 6, 2008
NEW YORK - Spending hours on a cell phone each day may affect the quality of a man’s sperm, preliminary research suggests.
In a study of 361 men seen at their infertility clinic, researchers at the Cleveland Clinic found an association between the patients’ cell phone use and their sperm quality.
On average, the more hours the men spent on their cell phones each day, the lower their sperm count and the greater their percentage of abnormal sperm.
The findings, published in the journal Fertility and Sterility, add to questions about the potential health effects of cell phones and other wireless devices. Some studies, for example, have linked long-term cell phone use to a higher risk of brain tumors, though many other studies have found no such connection.
The concern is that, over time, the electromagnetic energy emitted from mobile phones could theoretically harm body tissue — by damaging DNA, for example.
However, the new findings do not prove that cell phones somehow damage sperm, according to the researchers.
“Our results show a strong association of cell phone use with decreased semen quality. However, they do not prove a cause-and- effect relationship,” lead researcher Dr. Ashok Agarwal told Reuters Health.
He and his colleagues based their findings on semen samples from 361 men who came to their infertility clinic over one year. All of the men were questioned about their cell phone habits.
In general, the researchers found, sperm count and sperm quality tended to decline as daily cell phone hours increased. Men who said they used their phones for more than four hours each day had the lowest average sperm count and the fewest normal, viable sperm.
“We infer from our results that heavy cell phone use ... is associated with a lower semen quality,” Agarwal said. But whether cell phones somehow directly affect men’s fertility is not clear.
Agarwal said he and his colleagues have two studies underway aiming to shed light on the issue. In one, they are exposing semen samples to electromagnetic radiation from cell phones to see what, if any, effects occur.
The second is a follow-up to the current study that is assessing a larger group of men. Agarwal said this study is more rigorously designed and will account for certain other factors like lifestyle habits and occupational exposures that might affect sperm quality.
URL: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23033163/ _________________ [quote="Swass"] 8824, dude - I suck. You were right.[/quote]. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
finkle Wakeboarder.com Freak


Joined: 22 Sep 2003 Posts: 4067
|
Posted: Feb 07, 2008 10:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
looks like I'm in the clear. I have a digital wireless phone. Who even uses those "cellular" phones these days anyway?  _________________
| Best Quote Ever wrote: | | 'No regrets', that's my motto.....well, that and 'everybody wang chung tonight' |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ontrider Ladies Man


Joined: 30 Jul 2003 Posts: 16491 City: Russia
|
Posted: Feb 07, 2008 10:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
Who talks with their balls?  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kavlock99 Wakeboarder.Commie


Joined: 06 Feb 2004 Posts: 1214 City: St. Louis
|
Posted: Feb 07, 2008 10:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
| ontrider wrote: | Who talks with their balls?  |
Peter Griffin. They're on his chin.
 _________________ (0OO \ (||||)(||||) / OO0) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Broccoli B Wakeboarder.com Freak


Joined: 12 Jul 2003 Posts: 2670 City: Grand Rapids
|
Posted: Feb 07, 2008 10:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
he's a ballchinian. _________________ Brent B
| jt09 wrote: | | don't assume what you think i assume. you would assume wrong. |
| lcap wrote: | | you assume that i assume that my assuming is wrong and assume your assumption therefore must be correct. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
boardordie Wakeboarder.Commie

Joined: 02 Sep 2004 Posts: 1038 City: Piqua/Ohio
|
Posted: Feb 07, 2008 10:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
Haven't see anyone talk with their balls. I have seen plenty talk out of their A$$ though!  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ohioboarder Addict

Joined: 18 Aug 2005 Posts: 520 City: Over there
|
Posted: Feb 07, 2008 12:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Stop sitting your phone in your lap while talking on speaker phone. _________________ MMMM... COFFEE |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Hollywood PityDaFool Who Posts This Much


Joined: 01 Oct 2003 Posts: 5601 City: Door Knob
|
Posted: Feb 07, 2008 1:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Good, I'll keep chatting it up so I don't have to wear a condom having sex with my wife. _________________
| dizzlestoy wrote: | | Dumb question... What is "Bubb Rubbing" I googled it and wakeboarder.com came up. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DJew Jake Wakeboarder.com Freak


Joined: 17 Sep 2003 Posts: 3907 City: Toronto
|
Posted: Feb 07, 2008 1:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Study is only 361 trials hardly proves anything. _________________ They know what is what but they dono what is what they just strut. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|