| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
rappleby99 Newbie

Joined: 30 Dec 2006 Posts: 28 City: Panama City
|
Posted: Jan 17, 2007 2:21 pm Post subject: Gas expense.... O/B vs I/B ?? |
|
|
| Hi, I dont know anyone nearby who has an inboard boat to compare with. I want to know if there is a big difference on gas consumption between inboard and o/b. Lets say my 140hp yamaha o/b consumes around 20 gal in 7 hours wakeboarding. How much would a 5.7 L engine consume?[/b] |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
K-boarder Newbie

Joined: 04 Oct 2006 Posts: 14
|
Posted: Jan 17, 2007 2:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| In short about the same in the same sized boat. But there are alot of variables. If your yamaha is a 2-smoke you got to figure all that oil to. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nickl011 Wakeboarder.Commie


Joined: 14 Jan 2007 Posts: 1711 City: Fargo
|
Posted: Jan 17, 2007 6:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i dont want to sound like an ass, but obviously a v8 would consume more. v8 r always gas guzzlers because of more cylinders. an o/b has less cylinders and would produce less power although an outboard is considerably lighter than a v8, so in some cases an outboard could be faster. if ur going for wake size which would make sense, go with an inboard, it depends on wat ur budget is  _________________ 04 LF Trip 133
06 LF Transits
01 Cassette Series |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
K-boarder Newbie

Joined: 04 Oct 2006 Posts: 14
|
Posted: Jan 17, 2007 7:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
[quote="LFPIMP"]i dont want to sound like an ass, but obviously a v8 would consume more. v8 r always gas guzzlers because of more cylinders. an o/b has less cylinders and would produce less power although an outboard is considerably lighter than a v8, so in some cases an outboard could be faster.quote]
I here what your saying and your right in a way. But older carburated outboards are far less efficient than a four stroke I/O. The smaller outboard will have to be run much harder to get the same results. A full day of boarding on my buddys SN2001 will burn about 20 gals. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rappleby99 Newbie

Joined: 30 Dec 2006 Posts: 28 City: Panama City
|
Posted: Jan 18, 2007 7:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks for the info guys. Yes, my first though was that a 2-stroke 1.7L o/b consumes a lot if you compare it to a 4-stoke i/b with same engine size (proportionally).
Is the SN2001 a V6 or V8, whats the displacement of motor. It seems that consumption is similar to my o/b.
And yes... I want to change to an i/o. Maybe a 3.0 L mercruiser, I was just afraid that it would consume twice as much as my 1.7 L o/b. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
K-boarder Newbie

Joined: 04 Oct 2006 Posts: 14
|
Posted: Jan 18, 2007 12:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| rappleby99 wrote: |
Is the SN2001 a V6 or V8, whats the displacement of motor.
|
5.8 v8 We run between 2000-2500 rpms when pulling. I had a 18' bowrider with a 115 merc outboard and had to run it 4000 rpms to get 22mph, It would burn about 20 gals on a full day riding to. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jjaszkow Wakeboarder.Commie

Joined: 25 Jul 2006 Posts: 2124 City: Some Airport
|
Posted: Jan 18, 2007 12:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The SN2001 is a V8 boat. I think that it comes with either a 351 or 454, but there might be other options as well.
If your are doing 20 gals a day with your o/b, you might even see an improvement going to the 3.0 L mercruiser. Given the choice, I'd personally choose the SN2001 or another inboard over an I/O, but there are a variety of reasons to choose either way (what are you using the boat for, budget etc etc). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nickl011 Wakeboarder.Commie


Joined: 14 Jan 2007 Posts: 1711 City: Fargo
|
Posted: Jan 18, 2007 2:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
the motor is most likely to be a 351, cuz thats a ford powerplant, and i think correct craft used fords back in the day _________________ 04 LF Trip 133
06 LF Transits
01 Cassette Series |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jjaszkow Wakeboarder.Commie

Joined: 25 Jul 2006 Posts: 2124 City: Some Airport
|
Posted: Jan 18, 2007 8:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| You are correct that most of them came with a 351W, but I am pretty sure that the 454 was an engine option in those boats as well (there were probably others, but those are the ones that I am aware of). There are some SN2001 experts on this board which would know better than I would. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|