Wakeboarder Forum Index

 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   StatisticsStats   FavoritesFavorites   RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages  Log inLog in 
BlogsBlogs   

Gas expense.... O/B vs I/B ??

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Wakeboarder Forum Index -> Newbie Questions
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
rappleby99
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 30 Dec 2006
Posts: 28
City: Panama City

PostPosted: Jan 17, 2007 2:21 pm    Post subject: Gas expense.... O/B vs I/B ?? Reply with quote

Hi, I dont know anyone nearby who has an inboard boat to compare with. I want to know if there is a big difference on gas consumption between inboard and o/b. Lets say my 140hp yamaha o/b consumes around 20 gal in 7 hours wakeboarding. How much would a 5.7 L engine consume?[/b]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
K-boarder
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 04 Oct 2006
Posts: 14

PostPosted: Jan 17, 2007 2:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

In short about the same in the same sized boat. But there are alot of variables. If your yamaha is a 2-smoke you got to figure all that oil to.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nickl011
Wakeboarder.Commie
Wakeboarder.Commie


Joined: 14 Jan 2007
Posts: 1711
City: Fargo

PostPosted: Jan 17, 2007 6:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

i dont want to sound like an ass, but obviously a v8 would consume more. v8 r always gas guzzlers because of more cylinders. an o/b has less cylinders and would produce less power although an outboard is considerably lighter than a v8, so in some cases an outboard could be faster. if ur going for wake size which would make sense, go with an inboard, it depends on wat ur budget is Cool
_________________
04 LF Trip 133
06 LF Transits
01 Cassette Series
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
K-boarder
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 04 Oct 2006
Posts: 14

PostPosted: Jan 17, 2007 7:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

[quote="LFPIMP"]i dont want to sound like an ass, but obviously a v8 would consume more. v8 r always gas guzzlers because of more cylinders. an o/b has less cylinders and would produce less power although an outboard is considerably lighter than a v8, so in some cases an outboard could be faster.quote]

I here what your saying and your right in a way. But older carburated outboards are far less efficient than a four stroke I/O. The smaller outboard will have to be run much harder to get the same results. A full day of boarding on my buddys SN2001 will burn about 20 gals.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rappleby99
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 30 Dec 2006
Posts: 28
City: Panama City

PostPosted: Jan 18, 2007 7:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks for the info guys. Yes, my first though was that a 2-stroke 1.7L o/b consumes a lot if you compare it to a 4-stoke i/b with same engine size (proportionally).
Is the SN2001 a V6 or V8, whats the displacement of motor. It seems that consumption is similar to my o/b.

And yes... I want to change to an i/o. Maybe a 3.0 L mercruiser, I was just afraid that it would consume twice as much as my 1.7 L o/b.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
K-boarder
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 04 Oct 2006
Posts: 14

PostPosted: Jan 18, 2007 12:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

rappleby99 wrote:

Is the SN2001 a V6 or V8, whats the displacement of motor.


5.8 v8 We run between 2000-2500 rpms when pulling. I had a 18' bowrider with a 115 merc outboard and had to run it 4000 rpms to get 22mph, It would burn about 20 gals on a full day riding to.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jjaszkow
Wakeboarder.Commie
Wakeboarder.Commie


Joined: 25 Jul 2006
Posts: 2124
City: Some Airport

PostPosted: Jan 18, 2007 12:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The SN2001 is a V8 boat. I think that it comes with either a 351 or 454, but there might be other options as well.

If your are doing 20 gals a day with your o/b, you might even see an improvement going to the 3.0 L mercruiser. Given the choice, I'd personally choose the SN2001 or another inboard over an I/O, but there are a variety of reasons to choose either way (what are you using the boat for, budget etc etc).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nickl011
Wakeboarder.Commie
Wakeboarder.Commie


Joined: 14 Jan 2007
Posts: 1711
City: Fargo

PostPosted: Jan 18, 2007 2:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

the motor is most likely to be a 351, cuz thats a ford powerplant, and i think correct craft used fords back in the day
_________________
04 LF Trip 133
06 LF Transits
01 Cassette Series
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
jjaszkow
Wakeboarder.Commie
Wakeboarder.Commie


Joined: 25 Jul 2006
Posts: 2124
City: Some Airport

PostPosted: Jan 18, 2007 8:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

You are correct that most of them came with a 351W, but I am pretty sure that the 454 was an engine option in those boats as well (there were probably others, but those are the ones that I am aware of). There are some SN2001 experts on this board which would know better than I would.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Wakeboarder Forum Index -> Newbie Questions All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

Add To Favorites

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum
             


Copyright © 2012 - Wakeboarding - Wakeboarder.com - All Right Reserved
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group