| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
graphik Addict

Joined: 20 Feb 2003 Posts: 727 City: miller lake
|
Posted: May 20, 2003 7:17 am Post subject: weighting a slalom ski boat` |
|
|
| Really got into the sport with a little jet boat, then did some homework and went looking for an inboard. I picked up a 1993 Tige which runs beautiful, and looks great. The hull of this boat is pretty thin (not deep), and I'm wondering if anyone has any weight advice. I'm simply thinking of friends in the boat, and/or weight in the sides and at the back. Because this is a shallow hull, should I be worried about anything.? Any advice. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
anti-shoobies Wakeboarder.Commie


Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 1725 City: Ghettoburg
|
Posted: May 20, 2003 7:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
600 in the back. 375 in the bow. and maybe 500 in side sacs. That will throw a sick wake. I run that setup in my 94 Prostar without the side sacs and it is awesome. _________________ Ride harder...
www.CONCUSSEDTHREADZ.com
www.MIDWESTMILITIA.net |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
graphik Addict

Joined: 20 Feb 2003 Posts: 727 City: miller lake
|
Posted: May 20, 2003 7:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
anti-shoobies... so you're telling me that you've never really had a problem with a shallow hull? I'm trying to remember how deep those hulls are. Mine is probably a foot and a half tall at the back of the boat. But I'll try the weight and see what happens. _________________ 500 up |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
anti-shoobies Wakeboarder.Commie


Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 1725 City: Ghettoburg
|
Posted: May 20, 2003 7:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
It'll be pretty low. You just have to be careful driving through rollers so you don't dip the bow. The back wasn't a problem for me. _________________ Ride harder...
www.CONCUSSEDTHREADZ.com
www.MIDWESTMILITIA.net |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
projectely4 Addict


Joined: 18 Mar 2003 Posts: 633 City: Bradenton, Florida
|
Posted: May 20, 2003 10:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
get a fat sac for the back and side sacs for the sides of the engine and that will be a nice wake. _________________ pointless crew is so insane. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tdes Soul Rider

Joined: 07 Feb 2003 Posts: 270 City: Orlando
|
Posted: May 20, 2003 11:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
I've been concerned about this too with my old slalom ski boat. it rides really low and rollers will sometimes go over the bow. I already have a lot of the weight with the 454 engine, and was considering the feasibility of a fat sack in the back and possible on the sides.
What I've been doing is going for the active ballast system. Just get a bunch of people out there and have them stand or sit in various positions throughout the boat and check it out. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Cary K. Outlaw

Joined: 13 Jan 2003 Posts: 225 City: Wilson, NC
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Hyperryd Addict


Joined: 03 May 2003 Posts: 604 City: Central Cali
|
Posted: May 20, 2003 5:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Fat sack in the rear, two 15" subs and three amps in the bow! Works great on my Tige'.
PS. Do you have TAPS? _________________ Hot Women, Phat Boats, and Sweet Rides make the world go round! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
anti-shoobies Wakeboarder.Commie


Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 1725 City: Ghettoburg
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Hyperryd Addict


Joined: 03 May 2003 Posts: 604 City: Central Cali
|
Posted: May 20, 2003 6:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hey 15s and two boxes ain't light. There's probably 200 lbs in the subs and boxes, 20 lbs in the amps and two batteries are near 100 lbs. It sure is a lot more fun than a bag of water  _________________ Hot Women, Phat Boats, and Sweet Rides make the world go round! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
graphik Addict

Joined: 20 Feb 2003 Posts: 727 City: miller lake
|
Posted: May 21, 2003 6:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
| No, I don't have TAPPS, and wish I did. I think you can get it aftermarket, but for this boat it's not worth it, because I don't want to sink a tonne of money into it (just spent $700 on winterization and maintence, and another $450 on a pylon), I just want to get out there and ride. I think too that I'll mostly be using friends as ballast. I'm betting that I get get 7 or 8 of em out each time I ride. 2 of em are in the 230-260 range, so that's not bad. Other than that I'm just thinking of filling up a gas can with sand and water and see what that does. I'm not opposed to fat sacs, but I'll probably need the room. Plus with the shallow hull, I don't want to sink it too much. I'll just have to try some things and see what happens. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Breezer Outlaw


Joined: 17 Jan 2003 Posts: 246 City: Austin
|
Posted: May 21, 2003 6:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I have two launch pad sacs that are 350 lbs each. I use both when there are 2-5 people in the boat. However, since the boat is closed bow, when we have more than five people, I usually only fill up one. The 350 lb sacs are the same length as the big ones, with a small diameter. With only one filled up it make for a good foot rest for those in the back seat. I always make sure there is a minimum of 700 lbs in my boat, along with me and my wife. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|