| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
ssmitty85 Newbie

Joined: 15 Jun 2006 Posts: 13
|
Posted: Aug 20, 2006 6:34 pm Post subject: 94 Tige SLM comp? |
|
|
| need some opinions. now for my area, this is pretty much as good as is gets. its got 440 hours, tower. exl condition. can prolly get it for around 10,000. this is best ive seen in a year of looking, in my price range. As long the wake is better than my 88 bayliner outboard ill be happy. lol thanks |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
ssmitty85 Newbie

Joined: 15 Jun 2006 Posts: 13
|
Posted: Aug 22, 2006 5:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| no opinions.?? can any one even tell me if the wake will at least be bigger.? lol |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Blue22V Soul Rider


Joined: 19 Mar 2004 Posts: 290 City: Double Oak
|
Posted: Aug 23, 2006 6:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
| That boat is well built. The early Tige' boats were very heavy for their size. The issue is they were built to be a slalom ski boat. The wake is almost non-existent in comparison to current wake boats. As a wakeboard boat, it isn't an upgrade from a V bottom boat like your bayliner. I suggest you keep looking, unless you want to waterski exclusively. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jpwakejp Newbie

Joined: 16 Aug 2006 Posts: 6
|
Posted: Aug 23, 2006 8:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
| This is true it is made to not put out a wake at 30-33mph.....BUT.... slow it down to about 21 and your in buisness....throw about 8 people on there and the wake is nice and solid. I test drove 1996 ski centurion that is also a comp ski boat and it had a scary wake. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ssmitty85 Newbie

Joined: 15 Jun 2006 Posts: 13
|
Posted: Aug 23, 2006 6:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| thnx for input. ive been looking for a year now. and this is the first non bayliner, and bout of that nature ive seen for under 10,000. ill def get some sacks for it. im gona look at it this weekend and hes gonna take it out for us. so well see |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|