| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
BigDeal Soul Rider

Joined: 18 Oct 2003 Posts: 477 City: Orlando
|
Posted: Jun 14, 2004 8:41 pm Post subject: Stereo Impedance Question |
|
|
The equipment:
1 - 1000wx2 amp (stable down to 2 ohm stereo load)
3 - Pair of MB Quart RCE components (wired individually, i.e. 6 channels)
The question:
How should I wire the six speakers to work with my 2 channel amp? Can I create one channel where speaker #1 is wired to speaker #2 in parellel and then to speaker #3 in series, then repeat the process and create a second channel for speakers 4-6? What ohm load would that create per channel (6 ohms)? Any issue running that ohm load on my amp?
This one's got me a little stumped.........  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Johnny5 Criminal


Joined: 17 Apr 2004 Posts: 82
|
Posted: Jun 14, 2004 11:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
That would certainly work and would definitely give you a load above 2 ohms so you are safe.
Just watch the bass as impedence varies with frequency, in other words the lower the note you play the lower the impedence of the speaker.
So you MBQ's though a 4ohm speaker that is an average impedence and it can and will drop down. However, your amp was designed with that in mind and should be able to handle the momentary low impedence drive.
Hopefully the amp has got the b@!!$ to do it.
Shouldn't hurt to try, should only shut own if the load is too much. _________________ SWEET! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jlembas Newbie


Joined: 28 Mar 2003 Posts: 13 City: AZ
|
Posted: Jun 15, 2004 6:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
BigDeal,
Your problem is fairly common, but there isn't much of a solution. You may have several issues with the way you want to wire your speakers up. First, running a parallel-series configuration will give you a 6-ohm load (not great for a car audio amp). Secondly, speaker set #1 and #2 will only get half of the power that #3 will see....not good. Third, this configuration isn't the best for sound quality. You have a great set of component speakers and it would be a shame to wire them up in a way that will sacrifice the sound quality.
Your best solution would be to wire only two sets in parallel which will sound great and get another amp for the third set (I'm sure you already thought of that). Or, if you are a casual listener and don't crank it up too much, try running all three sets in parallel and see what you amp does. It might be O.K. Hope this helps. _________________ J. Lembas
Fluid Concepts
www.fluidconcepts.net
(800) 284-6615 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BigDeal Soul Rider

Joined: 18 Oct 2003 Posts: 477 City: Orlando
|
Posted: Jun 15, 2004 10:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
| jlembas wrote: | | Or, if you are a casual listener and don't crank it up too much, try running all three sets in parallel and see what you amp does. It might be O.K. Hope this helps. |
I thought about trying just that. Wiring three speakers in parellel would yield a 3 ohm load, wouldn't it? I'm a little concerened that any attempts on my part to "Pump Up The Volume" with that ohm load would result in a very hot amp at best, and clipping or damage to the amp at worst. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mr. Mutt Soul Rider


Joined: 26 Aug 2003 Posts: 395 City: San Francisco
|
Posted: Jun 15, 2004 11:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think the answer is buy a 4 channel amp and use your 2 channel for the new sub you're going to install as well...you can get them pretty good on etronics. I got a kicker 650.4 for around $300, and it sounds pretty solid. _________________ "Remember when I said I'd kill you last...I lied"
"Let off some steam, Bennett!"
"Gooooooo! Get to the choppa!"
Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Xaggerate Outlaw


Joined: 29 Mar 2004 Posts: 135 City: SLO/Poway
|
Posted: Jun 15, 2004 12:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| BigDeal wrote: | | jlembas wrote: | | Or, if you are a casual listener and don't crank it up too much, try running all three sets in parallel and see what you amp does. It might be O.K. Hope this helps. |
I thought about trying just that. Wiring three speakers in parellel would yield a 3 ohm load, wouldn't it? I'm a little concerened that any attempts on my part to "Pump Up The Volume" with that ohm load would result in a very hot amp at best, and clipping or damage to the amp at worst. |
Wiring 3 (4 ohm) speakers in parallel will yield a 1.33 ohm load (1/4+1/4+1/4)^-1
Your best solution is either to find an amp at 1 ohm stereo capable of driving that low load...or reconsider your speaker setup...I'd make sure it's 2 channel too as to maintain stereo separation... _________________ WWW.STEREOINTEGRITY.COM
ASK ME ABOUT SUBWOOFERS!
2002 Yellow Calabria Laguna (21ft jet ski)
Phoenix Gold/Image Dynamics/Knukonceptz/MT Evid 6.2
2001 Trip 138 + 2004 LF bindings
67" Connelly F3 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jlembas Newbie


Joined: 28 Mar 2003 Posts: 13 City: AZ
|
Posted: Jun 15, 2004 12:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I should have clarified the ohm load on the parallel. Running three 4 ohm speakers in parallel will give you a 1.33 ohm load. This is a low ohm load for most amps, but not for all. Most quality amplifiers will go into protect mode if you exceed their limitations. The amp will run warm/hot if under high output for sure.
We always advise against doing this since we like to see the equipment last. _________________ J. Lembas
Fluid Concepts
www.fluidconcepts.net
(800) 284-6615 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BigDeal Soul Rider

Joined: 18 Oct 2003 Posts: 477 City: Orlando
|
Posted: Jun 15, 2004 9:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Somehow I figured I'd probably be having to shop for another amp. The funny thing is that the issue is not so much the cost of the additional amp, but moreso where to mount it in my D-drive. I've already got three amps hidden away without having lost any storage space, but a fourth is really going to tax my creativity on finding a place to mount it without encroaching on my (limited) storage space. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Xaggerate Outlaw


Joined: 29 Mar 2004 Posts: 135 City: SLO/Poway
|
Posted: Jun 16, 2004 8:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
It'll no doubt tax your electrical system as well.... _________________ WWW.STEREOINTEGRITY.COM
ASK ME ABOUT SUBWOOFERS!
2002 Yellow Calabria Laguna (21ft jet ski)
Phoenix Gold/Image Dynamics/Knukonceptz/MT Evid 6.2
2001 Trip 138 + 2004 LF bindings
67" Connelly F3 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BigDeal Soul Rider

Joined: 18 Oct 2003 Posts: 477 City: Orlando
|
Posted: Jun 16, 2004 10:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Xaggerate wrote: | | It'll no doubt tax your electrical system as well.... |
I think I should be OK. I've already upgraded to a 140amp alternator and two Blue top Optimas.
-Mike- |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Xaggerate Outlaw


Joined: 29 Mar 2004 Posts: 135 City: SLO/Poway
|
Posted: Jun 16, 2004 12:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| BigDeal wrote: | | Xaggerate wrote: | | It'll no doubt tax your electrical system as well.... |
I think I should be OK. I've already upgraded to a 140amp alternator and two Blue top Optimas.
-Mike- |
190 amp alternator and one red top fueling 3kw taxed my system down 2v...I'd go 240a in your case... _________________ WWW.STEREOINTEGRITY.COM
ASK ME ABOUT SUBWOOFERS!
2002 Yellow Calabria Laguna (21ft jet ski)
Phoenix Gold/Image Dynamics/Knukonceptz/MT Evid 6.2
2001 Trip 138 + 2004 LF bindings
67" Connelly F3 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|