Wakeboarder Forum Index

 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   StatisticsStats   FavoritesFavorites   RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages  Log inLog in 
BlogsBlogs   

SKi nautique 2001 or Barefoot nautique

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Wakeboarder Forum Index -> Wakeboard Boat General Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
tn_guy212000
Soul Rider
Soul Rider


Joined: 12 Jan 2003
Posts: 268

PostPosted: Feb 17, 2003 11:36 am    Post subject: SKi nautique 2001 or Barefoot nautique Reply with quote

what is the difference between these two boats and which would make the sickest wake Question
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger
orzech
Wakeboarder.Commie
Wakeboarder.Commie


Joined: 12 Jan 2003
Posts: 1155
City: Honeoye

PostPosted: Feb 17, 2003 11:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

barefoot has a larger engine.. i have herd the 2001 wake is better than a barefoot... but i do not know
_________________
GOT NAUTIQUE?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address
mkcarte2
Outlaw
Outlaw


Joined: 17 Jan 2003
Posts: 168
City: raliegh, nc

PostPosted: Feb 17, 2003 12:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I believe the barefoot has a chevy 454, while the 2001 has a ford 351. I can only speak for the 2001's wake, I think everyone will agree that it was the best wake in its time, I have one right now. Not sure about the barefoot.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address
glsurf
Outlaw
Outlaw


Joined: 19 Feb 2003
Posts: 117
City: Tampa, FL

PostPosted: Feb 19, 2003 3:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have a Nautique Excel with the 454 in it, which is comparable to the Barefoot and my wake is pretty darn big. I would say comparable in size to my brother-in-laws' '02 SAN TE, BUT definitely not the same pop. I really do like my wake and it is plenty big for the $. I could go spend another $40k and get the TE, but it's just not worth it to me.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
jaysunn
Criminal
Criminal


Joined: 13 Jan 2003
Posts: 91
City: ATX

PostPosted: Feb 19, 2003 3:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hey glsurf did you give up trying to sell your excel?
_________________
I have gone to great lengths to expand my threshold for pain.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tn_guy212000
Soul Rider
Soul Rider


Joined: 12 Jan 2003
Posts: 268

PostPosted: Feb 19, 2003 5:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

how does the 454 compare to the 351...performace wise and gas milage...i just like the sound of a chevy engine in my boat as to a ford but i would like some input from you guys.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger
glsurf
Outlaw
Outlaw


Joined: 19 Feb 2003
Posts: 117
City: Tampa, FL

PostPosted: Feb 20, 2003 2:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

jaysunn,
Yeah, I actually had a couple of offers, but I decided that if I would have sold it, I probably would have went and bought another boat, and probably a more expensive one, too. Besides, I really do like the wake.

The 454 does pretty good on gas mileage. I can run all day strictly wakeboarding on 33 gallons.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
indo
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 13 Jan 2003
Posts: 40
City: Smith Mountain Lake

PostPosted: Feb 20, 2003 5:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

i have a 93 nautique excel with the 5.7 liter pro boss. after 91 the nautique excel and barefooter are the same boat just depending on the graphics that came on the boat. my father has a 81 barefooter with the 454. both boat have very deep hull for the time and put out an excelent wake when wieght correctly
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ryan_Shima1
Criminal
Criminal


Joined: 20 Feb 2003
Posts: 88
City: Layton

PostPosted: Feb 20, 2003 10:40 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Get the 2001, the wake is better then the barefoot Nautique.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
glsurf
Outlaw
Outlaw


Joined: 19 Feb 2003
Posts: 117
City: Tampa, FL

PostPosted: Feb 20, 2003 2:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Aren't the 2001s pretty small?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
AirMcScooter
Outlaw
Outlaw


Joined: 26 Jan 2003
Posts: 150
City: AUSTIN

PostPosted: Feb 20, 2003 2:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

im going to agree with Ryan. the 2001 one has a sweet wake and the 351 is plenty of motor.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address
mkcarte2
Outlaw
Outlaw


Joined: 17 Jan 2003
Posts: 168
City: raliegh, nc

PostPosted: Feb 20, 2003 2:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have one and i dont think so, I mean it is compared to a new air nautique or something, but it is 20'. I have no problems with room or getting all my gear in.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address
Ryan_Shima1
Criminal
Criminal


Joined: 20 Feb 2003
Posts: 88
City: Layton

PostPosted: Feb 20, 2003 3:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

glsurf,
The 2001's are 19 feet but I took out the backseat in mine for more room. In my opinion, the back seat is useless anyways, I just have my friends sit on the floor. Anyways, Without the backseat in the boat, I have more room for 2 fat sacs (one on each side of the engine cover towards the back) and 200lbs in lead in the bow. Add about 4-6 people in the boat with their gear and it's a nice wake. I've ridden both wakes and I like the shape of the 2001 much better. If you have a tower with board racks on the boat, it helps make the boat even more roomier. Hope that helps.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
glsurf
Outlaw
Outlaw


Joined: 19 Feb 2003
Posts: 117
City: Tampa, FL

PostPosted: Feb 20, 2003 3:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I guess the boats are very similar. Is the 2001 a V-Drive?
I do have a tower and racks and it does help tremendously. I actually have about 550 pounds on each side of the motor and 800 up front. Although, I think I am going to try 850 on each side of the motor and 1000 up front to try and kill myself. I want to fly!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Ryan_Shima1
Criminal
Criminal


Joined: 20 Feb 2003
Posts: 88
City: Layton

PostPosted: Feb 20, 2003 3:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The 2001 is a direct drive.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Lucky
Outlaw
Outlaw


Joined: 13 Jan 2003
Posts: 198
City: Jacksonville FL

PostPosted: Feb 21, 2003 7:11 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The 2001 is great.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Bluesman
Criminal
Criminal


Joined: 17 Jan 2003
Posts: 99
City: Petaluma, California

PostPosted: Feb 21, 2003 8:27 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The fuel tank on my 1982 S/N 2001 only holds 23 gallons. With the 351 Ford we can go all day long on one tank, but are usually at 1/4 or below by the end of a long day.

If you go for the 454 and only the 23 gallon tank you'll need to refuel unless you're only out for a half day run.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
phiwi9966justwake
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 23 Feb 2003
Posts: 19
City: europe,weedland

PostPosted: Feb 24, 2003 2:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

a barefootis great i broke my board last summer behind a excel its almoste the sam boat it was huge that wake poppie and hard .
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
SCBrips
Guest





PostPosted: Feb 24, 2003 8:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I used to have an '83 2001. It was great and definitely provided a lot of bang for the buck. Add some weight and/or fat friends and the wake is perfect. I haven't ridden behind a Barefoot Nautique personally, but I've heard complaints of it having too wide a table.
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Wakeboarder Forum Index -> Wakeboard Boat General Discussion All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

Add To Favorites

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
             


Copyright © 2012 - Wakeboarding - Wakeboarder.com - All Right Reserved
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group