Wakeboarder Forum Index

 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   StatisticsStats   FavoritesFavorites   RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages  Log inLog in 
BlogsBlogs   

Congrats CO!
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Wakeboarder Forum Index -> Non-Wakeboarding
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
ChrisG
Wakeboarder.Commie
Wakeboarder.Commie


Joined: 24 May 2005
Posts: 1123
City: Brentwood, CA

PostPosted: Jan 02, 2014 4:26 pm    Post subject: Congrats CO! Reply with quote

Hopefully, we're right behind you.



CO.GIF

 Description:
 Filesize:  110.7 KB
 Viewed:  15430 Time(s)

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
pyrocasto
PityDaFool Who Posts This Much
PityDaFool Who Posts This Much


Joined: 29 Aug 2003
Posts: 5291
City: hendersonville

PostPosted: Jan 02, 2014 5:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Woot Woot! Rock on!
_________________
eeven73 wrote:

At least 50% of the population is retarded so I discount what they think or feel automatically.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address
E.J.
Ladies Man
Ladies Man


Joined: 15 Jan 2003
Posts: 7597
City: Mogadishu

PostPosted: Jan 02, 2014 6:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm interested to see if this goes as planned, if there is a mass passage of legalization throughout the States(save for a few holdouts), due to the massive tax revenue.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Okie Boarder
Ladies Man
Ladies Man


Joined: 03 Mar 2008
Posts: 10056
City: Edmond

PostPosted: Jan 03, 2014 4:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It would be great to see this start a wave of legalization throughout the US. After that, ALL drug laws should be struck from the books. It might be good to follow with releasing all non-violent drug offenders serving time. Maybe we can start knocking down the size of government and put a huge dent in defeating the Prison Industrial Complex.
_________________
If love is blind, why is lingerie so popular?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
E.J.
Ladies Man
Ladies Man


Joined: 15 Jan 2003
Posts: 7597
City: Mogadishu

PostPosted: Jan 03, 2014 6:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

So, Okie... You 're cool with opiates, cocaine, methamphetamine ect being legal?

(Not even sure why I'm biting)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
E.J.
Ladies Man
Ladies Man


Joined: 15 Jan 2003
Posts: 7597
City: Mogadishu

PostPosted: Jan 03, 2014 6:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Personally, I'm cool with a test run in Oklahoma...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Okie Boarder
Ladies Man
Ladies Man


Joined: 03 Mar 2008
Posts: 10056
City: Edmond

PostPosted: Jan 03, 2014 6:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

E.J. wrote:
So, Okie... You 're cool with opiates, cocaine, methamphetamine ect being legal?

(Not even sure why I'm biting)


Yep. We need to stop wasting tax payer money fighting a war that we will never win, and incarcerating people for doing nothing more than getting wasted. If people want to put something in their own bodies, who are we to tell them no...it's their body, their choice.

_________________
If love is blind, why is lingerie so popular?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
E.J.
Ladies Man
Ladies Man


Joined: 15 Jan 2003
Posts: 7597
City: Mogadishu

PostPosted: Jan 03, 2014 7:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

You know most drug crime is not possession, right? Meaning, it's property crime related to narcotics....

I assume you have a lot of history of 35 year old adults that can't get off the leaf....knocking over liquor stores and stealing DVD players out of houses....


Last edited by E.J. on Jan 03, 2014 7:31 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Okie Boarder
Ladies Man
Ladies Man


Joined: 03 Mar 2008
Posts: 10056
City: Edmond

PostPosted: Jan 03, 2014 7:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Punishment for true crimes isn't a problem. Putting a substance in one's body shouldn't be a crime.
_________________
If love is blind, why is lingerie so popular?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
E.J.
Ladies Man
Ladies Man


Joined: 15 Jan 2003
Posts: 7597
City: Mogadishu

PostPosted: Jan 03, 2014 7:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Okie Boarder wrote:
Punishment for true crimes isn't a problem. Putting a substance in one's body shouldn't be a crime.


So allowing people to use chit that will have them giving up their kids, sucking kock and breaking in your house to pawn your chit is okay....it just what is the ramifications, that's the crime.... Laughing Fair enough.... Again, I'm 100% cool with you trying it out in Oklahoma.....

How much involvement do you have, first hand, with people who regularly recreationally use alcohol, THC, opiates, amphetamines, benzodiazapines, cocaine ect? Honest question....
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Okie Boarder
Ladies Man
Ladies Man


Joined: 03 Mar 2008
Posts: 10056
City: Edmond

PostPosted: Jan 03, 2014 7:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

We already allow people to use stuff that they get addicted to an abandon all reason. Even if we didn't, what makes us think we have the right to dictate to others what they can do to their own bodies. If they commit a real crime, then pop them for that crime. Otherwise, why are we wasting our money creating criminals, packing our prisons and helping gangs, cartels, etc.?

I have quite a bit of first hand knowledge and have seen people mess up their lives and the lives around them. I've seen our system put people away for nothing more than use or possession, as well. I've also seen many people get away from addictions and turn their life around.

_________________
If love is blind, why is lingerie so popular?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
E.J.
Ladies Man
Ladies Man


Joined: 15 Jan 2003
Posts: 7597
City: Mogadishu

PostPosted: Jan 03, 2014 8:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

So you regularly hang with recreational heroin, cocaine and/or methamphetamine users?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Okie Boarder
Ladies Man
Ladies Man


Joined: 03 Mar 2008
Posts: 10056
City: Edmond

PostPosted: Jan 03, 2014 8:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Not any more.
_________________
If love is blind, why is lingerie so popular?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
E.J.
Ladies Man
Ladies Man


Joined: 15 Jan 2003
Posts: 7597
City: Mogadishu

PostPosted: Jan 03, 2014 8:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

But you did & they were working, paying the bills, taking care if the kids...you know, living the American Dream?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
E.J.
Ladies Man
Ladies Man


Joined: 15 Jan 2003
Posts: 7597
City: Mogadishu

PostPosted: Jan 03, 2014 8:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Because I want to know what you in Oklahoma are going to do with all these prostitutes and smash and grab guys, that can't hold a job and just want a fix?

Treatment is the answer, but treatment for something that you knew was a nuke bomb...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
E.J.
Ladies Man
Ladies Man


Joined: 15 Jan 2003
Posts: 7597
City: Mogadishu

PostPosted: Jan 03, 2014 8:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Again, 100% cool with you trying to get this on the ballot in Oklahoma... Hell, I'd pay to see it...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
E.J.
Ladies Man
Ladies Man


Joined: 15 Jan 2003
Posts: 7597
City: Mogadishu

PostPosted: Jan 03, 2014 8:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Note, I am serious... I'd be all for seeing what happens if Oklahoma made a teener $4... Guys could get a puddle for a buck...everything State sanctioned and taxed(low prices to cut out the criminal element).... Let's see what happens vs Colorado and MJ....
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jt09
Ladies Man
Ladies Man


Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Posts: 22083
City: Austin

PostPosted: Jan 04, 2014 6:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

shouldn't strike drug laws, but possession needs to be decriminalized, and repeat offenders need to be treated, not jailed. prosecute the business of drugs, not the end user.

also, i'm very much looking forward to my trip to vail in 3 weeks. Razz
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Okie Boarder
Ladies Man
Ladies Man


Joined: 03 Mar 2008
Posts: 10056
City: Edmond

PostPosted: Jan 04, 2014 6:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

E.J. wrote:
But you did & they were working, paying the bills, taking care if the kids...you know, living the American Dream?


Some of them did and some of them were slaves to their addiction.

There are also alcoholics that throw their lives away...should we make alcohol illegal again? What about prescription drugs...people get addicted to them and throw their lives away...should those be banned and illegal?

We have two choices, keep feeding the criminal aspect of this by keeping these drugs illegal or make it legal and deal with the problem aspects of addiction.

The "war on drugs" is extremely costly and has been the cause for many laws that violate personal liberty. In addition, we have citizens in our jails whose only crime is the drug itself. We're feeding a machine.

Just because we make drugs legal, doesn't mean everyone is going to run out and do them, nor does it mean we will have a bigger problem.

Quote:
prosecute the business of drugs, not the end user.


Still won't work. Look how ineffective we have been eliminating cartels and stopping the supply of drugs into our country thus far.

_________________
If love is blind, why is lingerie so popular?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Okie Boarder
Ladies Man
Ladies Man


Joined: 03 Mar 2008
Posts: 10056
City: Edmond

PostPosted: Jan 04, 2014 6:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

E.J., I thought you were on the side of government not telling us what we can do with our bodies. Does that only apply to ending pregnancies, or do you truly believe government (or another group of people) shouldn't be able to dictate what we do with our own bodies?
_________________
If love is blind, why is lingerie so popular?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
E.J.
Ladies Man
Ladies Man


Joined: 15 Jan 2003
Posts: 7597
City: Mogadishu

PostPosted: Jan 04, 2014 7:22 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Okie Boarder wrote:
There are also alcoholics that throw their lives away...should we make alcohol illegal again? What about prescription drugs...people get addicted to them and throw their lives away...should those be banned and illegal?

Just because we make drugs legal, doesn't mean everyone is going to run out and do them, nor does it mean we will have a bigger problem.


People throw their lives away for all different reasons, if you do not see the different ramifications of drug use like thc, alcohol, caffeine ect vs opiates, amphetamines, cocaine ect....we are just on different planets....and that is okay.

You're aware that prescription drugs are illegal, right? To access them legally, you need a prescription, you have to go to a special place to get them, you are only afforded so much ect?

Yes, I think that MANY more people would experiment with any drug considered legal. It will happen with pot in Colorado, watch and see. There are MANY people who do not use a substance for the reason that it is not legal and/or accessible without crossing a line.

I cannot stress enough that I would love to see how this works out in Oklahoma, I just wouldn't want it to happen where I live.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
E.J.
Ladies Man
Ladies Man


Joined: 15 Jan 2003
Posts: 7597
City: Mogadishu

PostPosted: Jan 04, 2014 7:27 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Okie Boarder wrote:
E.J., I thought you were on the side of government not telling us what we can do with our bodies. Does that only apply to ending pregnancies, or do you truly believe government (or another group of people) shouldn't be able to dictate what we do with our own bodies?


Are you really that concrete in your thinking? Laughing

Maybe you are, which is a bit amusing and why I took the signature quote....
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Okie Boarder
Ladies Man
Ladies Man


Joined: 03 Mar 2008
Posts: 10056
City: Edmond

PostPosted: Jan 04, 2014 8:40 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I just don't think we have the right to dictate what people can and cannot do to their own bodies. True freedom and liberty is based upon letting people decide for themselves what they consider to be good or bad for them. If you're going to support limiting this for something you favor, you shouldn't be surprised when another group tries to limit something you are against.

Yes, I am that concrete, because it is inconsistent to favor limiting a person's choice on one hand, but be adamently against it on the other. That's one of the main philosophies that has sickened me with our political system today.

_________________
If love is blind, why is lingerie so popular?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
E.J.
Ladies Man
Ladies Man


Joined: 15 Jan 2003
Posts: 7597
City: Mogadishu

PostPosted: Jan 04, 2014 9:12 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Fair enough, we can disagree.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jt09
Ladies Man
Ladies Man


Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Posts: 22083
City: Austin

PostPosted: Jan 04, 2014 11:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Okie Boarder wrote:
Quote:
prosecute the business of drugs, not the end user.


Still won't work. Look how ineffective we have been eliminating cartels and stopping the supply of drugs into our country thus far.


not trying to win the war on drugs, just trying to keep people out of jail. possessing a drug shouldn't land someone behind bars.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
eeven73
PityDaFool Who Posts This Much
PityDaFool Who Posts This Much


Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Posts: 5377
City: Halfway

PostPosted: Jan 04, 2014 12:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Personally, I WOULD agree with legalize thoughts if we(society/tax payers) were not on the hook for the problems. If people really were accountable for there mistakes why would I give a Bubb Rubb if someone wants to mess themselves up. But, that's not the way it works and the flaw in Okies logic. Though he will never accept that.
_________________
Is President Obama a Keynesian?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Okie Boarder
Ladies Man
Ladies Man


Joined: 03 Mar 2008
Posts: 10056
City: Edmond

PostPosted: Jan 04, 2014 4:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

jt09 wrote:
Okie Boarder wrote:
Quote:
prosecute the business of drugs, not the end user.


Still won't work. Look how ineffective we have been eliminating cartels and stopping the supply of drugs into our country thus far.


not trying to win the war on drugs, just trying to keep people out of jail. possessing a drug shouldn't land someone behind bars.


I would agree with your last statement.

_________________
If love is blind, why is lingerie so popular?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Okie Boarder
Ladies Man
Ladies Man


Joined: 03 Mar 2008
Posts: 10056
City: Edmond

PostPosted: Jan 04, 2014 4:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

A couple statements I would agree with...

Quote:
Portugal decriminalized drugs, and overall usage went down as well as drug related crime.



In America, the prohibition era saw the greatest growth of crime and alcohol consumption. There will never be a "utopia", but criminalizing things that harm no one only pushes us further away from utopia. The goal is to always push forward for a more idealistic society, even though it is impossible to ever actually reach it.


Quote:
The greatest conservative thinkers now and in the past favor(ed) legalization: Buckley, Friedman, even Glen Beck to name a few. The "War on Drugs" is a complete failure. A COMPLETE failure. It's destroyed far more lives than it's ever helped and we've paid BILLIONS for that cockeyed result. But, as I've said here before, it's never going to be logic or common sense that will change the law. Governments insatiable need for money is what's changing the law.Period.

_________________
If love is blind, why is lingerie so popular?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Okie Boarder
Ladies Man
Ladies Man


Joined: 03 Mar 2008
Posts: 10056
City: Edmond

PostPosted: Jan 04, 2014 4:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

eeven73 wrote:
Personally, I WOULD agree with legalize thoughts if we(society/tax payers) were not on the hook for the problems. If people really were accountable for there mistakes why would I give a Bubb Rubb if someone wants to mess themselves up. But, that's not the way it works and the flaw in Okies logic. Though he will never accept that.


So, you're fine being on the hook for the "war" that is hundreds of millions of dollars a year, but you have a problem being on the hook for "problems" that might be in the singles or double digit millions per year? I guess you like starting a fire with hundred dollar bills?

_________________
If love is blind, why is lingerie so popular?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
nmballa
Wakeboarder.com Freak
Wakeboarder.com Freak


Joined: 14 Jan 2003
Posts: 3906
City: Milwaukee

PostPosted: Jan 04, 2014 10:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

E.J. wrote:
So, Okie... You 're cool with opiates, cocaine, methamphetamine ect being legal?

(Not even sure why I'm biting)


Prohibition is what got us in to this mess. Every time we classify something it has led us down a hole. BRB, coca was outlawed, this led to cocaine, which led to crack, which led to meth. Opium led us to heroin, further on to a fregan oxy, which has spiraled back in to a dirty heroin that is killing kids off. MDMA, perfectly safe, now we have bath salt fakes killing kids .

Since the drug war kicked off and everything that couldn't be taxed was made illegal the misery, poverty, and deaths have not gone down. They have increased 10 fold.

_________________
jt09 wrote:
I used to get all happy when the girlie would make a colonic appointment. That meant she was going to be breaking out the "fine china" soon.

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=509037985&ref=profile
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
eeven73
PityDaFool Who Posts This Much
PityDaFool Who Posts This Much


Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Posts: 5377
City: Halfway

PostPosted: Jan 04, 2014 10:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Okie Boarder wrote:
eeven73 wrote:
Personally, I WOULD agree with legalize thoughts if we(society/tax payers) were not on the hook for the problems. If people really were accountable for there mistakes why would I give a Bubb Rubb if someone wants to mess themselves up. But, that's not the way it works and the flaw in Okies logic. Though he will never accept that.


So, you're fine being on the hook for the "war" that is hundreds of millions of dollars a year, but you have a problem being on the hook for "problems" that might be in the singles or double digit millions per year? I guess you like starting a fire with hundred dollar bills?


Treatment, property crimes, foster children, ......etc are a problem on the magnitude of "double digit millions per year"? Ok Rolling Eyes

_________________
Is President Obama a Keynesian?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
nmballa
Wakeboarder.com Freak
Wakeboarder.com Freak


Joined: 14 Jan 2003
Posts: 3906
City: Milwaukee

PostPosted: Jan 04, 2014 10:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

EJ, I have a newsflash for ya. Its not just grab and smash criminals and whores doing drugs. It rolls from every level. Hell, George Bush did coke. The folks giving up on their kids and robbing, yeah they are the lowest denominator.

But in reality, in every major city, in just about every other bar, on any given Friday or Saturday night someone is ripping a line, eating a pill, or smoking something. Drugs are an every day part of this society. Only thing is folks like you have been spoon fed by the media that it is only the poor and destitute that use. Pull back the veil and welcome to the real world.

_________________
jt09 wrote:
I used to get all happy when the girlie would make a colonic appointment. That meant she was going to be breaking out the "fine china" soon.

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=509037985&ref=profile
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
nmballa
Wakeboarder.com Freak
Wakeboarder.com Freak


Joined: 14 Jan 2003
Posts: 3906
City: Milwaukee

PostPosted: Jan 04, 2014 10:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

eeven73 wrote:
Okie Boarder wrote:
eeven73 wrote:
Personally, I WOULD agree with legalize thoughts if we(society/tax payers) were not on the hook for the problems. If people really were accountable for there mistakes why would I give a Bubb Rubb if someone wants to mess themselves up. But, that's not the way it works and the flaw in Okies logic. Though he will never accept that.


So, you're fine being on the hook for the "war" that is hundreds of millions of dollars a year, but you have a problem being on the hook for "problems" that might be in the singles or double digit millions per year? I guess you like starting a fire with hundred dollar bills?


Treatment, property crimes, foster children, ......etc are a problem on the magnitude of "double digit millions per year"? Ok Rolling Eyes


Eh reality check, not hundreds of millions per year wasted on prohibition. Try closer to the tune of 20+ billion. So yeah, take that 20+ billion and apply it towards treatment, education, etc.

_________________
jt09 wrote:
I used to get all happy when the girlie would make a colonic appointment. That meant she was going to be breaking out the "fine china" soon.

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=509037985&ref=profile
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
Okie Boarder
Ladies Man
Ladies Man


Joined: 03 Mar 2008
Posts: 10056
City: Edmond

PostPosted: Jan 05, 2014 6:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

eeven73 wrote:
Okie Boarder wrote:
eeven73 wrote:
Personally, I WOULD agree with legalize thoughts if we(society/tax payers) were not on the hook for the problems. If people really were accountable for there mistakes why would I give a Bubb Rubb if someone wants to mess themselves up. But, that's not the way it works and the flaw in Okies logic. Though he will never accept that.


So, you're fine being on the hook for the "war" that is hundreds of millions of dollars a year, but you have a problem being on the hook for "problems" that might be in the singles or double digit millions per year? I guess you like starting a fire with hundred dollar bills?


Treatment, property crimes, foster children, ......etc are a problem on the magnitude of "double digit millions per year"? Ok Rolling Eyes


That wasn't meant to be taken as literal figures, but the cost of the "problems" that would come with legalizing would be a fraction of what we're spending now on the war on drugs and the cost of imprisonment. That's the point.

_________________
If love is blind, why is lingerie so popular?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Okie Boarder
Ladies Man
Ladies Man


Joined: 03 Mar 2008
Posts: 10056
City: Edmond

PostPosted: Jan 05, 2014 7:02 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

nmballa wrote:
eeven73 wrote:
Okie Boarder wrote:
eeven73 wrote:
Personally, I WOULD agree with legalize thoughts if we(society/tax payers) were not on the hook for the problems. If people really were accountable for there mistakes why would I give a Bubb Rubb if someone wants to mess themselves up. But, that's not the way it works and the flaw in Okies logic. Though he will never accept that.


So, you're fine being on the hook for the "war" that is hundreds of millions of dollars a year, but you have a problem being on the hook for "problems" that might be in the singles or double digit millions per year? I guess you like starting a fire with hundred dollar bills?


Treatment, property crimes, foster children, ......etc are a problem on the magnitude of "double digit millions per year"? Ok Rolling Eyes


Eh reality check, not hundreds of millions per year wasted on prohibition. Try closer to the tune of 20+ billion. So yeah, take that 20+ billion and apply it towards treatment, education, etc.


How about taking a fraction of that to treat the issue and put the rest back in the pockets of the people.

_________________
If love is blind, why is lingerie so popular?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Wakeboarder Forum Index -> Non-Wakeboarding All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

Add To Favorites

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
             


Copyright © 2012 - Wakeboarding - Wakeboarder.com - All Right Reserved
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group