| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
mikeridesbikess Newbie

Joined: 22 Aug 2006 Posts: 26
|
Posted: Sep 24, 2006 10:44 am Post subject: shane vs. watson |
|
|
| I decided that keeping my watson 134 wouldn't be a good idea being I weigh 160 and plan on adding 10-15lbs of muscle in the next yr, so I was looking at the watson 138 and shane 136. Has anyone ridden both of the boards and know how they compare? I have ridden the watson 134 but now the shane. Also does anyone ride either of these boards (watson 138/shane 136) at 170 lbs? I know height doesn't matter much but I am 5 7 if that makes a diff. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Bunkz Newbie

Joined: 27 Aug 2006 Posts: 37
|
Posted: Sep 24, 2006 11:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
| ive riden them both and own a shane 140 ... its going to be a lot looser feel in the neutral position than the watson by a good bit |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mikeridesbikess Newbie

Joined: 22 Aug 2006 Posts: 26
|
Posted: Sep 24, 2006 12:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Would you agree that the watson 138 is ideal for me weighing in around 170 at 5 7? Or atleast over the 134. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kyle Guest
|
Posted: Sep 24, 2006 12:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| what kind of roids are you doing? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TP83 Addict

Joined: 31 May 2006 Posts: 739 City: Woodside
|
Posted: Sep 24, 2006 12:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| damn this the the same kinda deal im in. i have my watson and love it but the watson 138 is sold out everywhere. the shane had really soft landings(i rode a 140 so thats y) and it spins on the water really smooth. without a center fin the board just slides over everything. id buy one in an instant along with a few of my firneds but no one really likes the picture frame. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mikeridesbikess Newbie

Joined: 22 Aug 2006 Posts: 26
|
Posted: Sep 24, 2006 12:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| nah not steroids but I'm using no xplode I have cycled it once before and its ridiculous the gains you can make off of it with the right diet. I'm not that great of a rider I went to a camp for about 3 weeks behind an x star and get around 4ft of height wake to wake, but haven't tried any spins wake to wake yet. I remember what I liked about the watson was that it hooked up pretty well in the turns, so I think might be what I want to stay with. Its just a matter of keeping my 134 and probably being too heavy for it, or buying a 138. When I rode the 134 this summer I still weighed 160 and the board felt great, but I want something that will work in a few seasons also. Anyone out there who weighs what I do please let me know how either of the boards worked for you, thanks. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nickdakoolkat Wakeboarder.Commie

Joined: 05 Jul 2004 Posts: 1272 City: The Bay Area
|
Posted: Sep 24, 2006 6:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have a watson 138 (Im 175 lbs) and I love it.
All natural is the most healthy way to gain muscle. Creatine could be worst for you than you would think:
http://manbir-online.com/questions/creatine.htm
...I'm not telling you not to take it, just hoping that you research first. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mikeridesbikess Newbie

Joined: 22 Aug 2006 Posts: 26
|
Posted: Sep 24, 2006 8:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Yah man thanks for your concern, but I have researched creatine for months and have been working out for a few years now. I am aware of the consequences if its abused. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
alafiaboarder Wakeboarder.Commie


Joined: 03 Oct 2003 Posts: 1208 City: Gaines Hell
|
Posted: Sep 25, 2006 9:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
5'9, 175, shane 140 for the time being, i like longer boards, the shanes still easy to spin at that length, landings are mad soft too, u should go with 138 but my friend ryan has 134 and he weighs like 185-190 and rips it real hard _________________ Broke, Unsponsored, Carless, Broken donor cycle, 18 credit hours... and i drive to class wheeliein my sisters 49cc scooter... yea im bawlin |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Epic Addict

Joined: 21 Aug 2005 Posts: 765
|
Posted: Sep 25, 2006 8:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| nickdakoolkat wrote: | I have a watson 138 (Im 175 lbs) and I love it.
All natural is the most healthy way to gain muscle. Creatine could be worst for you than you would think:
http://manbir-online.com/questions/creatine.htm
...I'm not telling you not to take it, just hoping that you research first. |
That could be the worse article describing the negative effects of a drug I have ever seen. It doesn't offer an ounce of evidence one way or another as to side effects of creatine. Just speculation. Hell, I could write that article. "Uhhhh.....a guy died in a car accident after taking creatine for 3 months, therefore creatine maaaaaaaaaaaay be bad for you.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|