| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
projectely4 Addict


Joined: 18 Mar 2003 Posts: 633 City: Bradenton, Florida
|
Posted: Oct 13, 2003 4:55 pm Post subject: wakesurfing behind 03-04 x-star |
|
|
is any one surfing behind theirs because we tried over the weekend and the wake at 12 was really small and not good fro wakesurfing. if anyone is surfing behind their 03-04 x-star what speed are you at and what weight configuration. _________________ pointless crew is so insane. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
holdsworth PityDaFool Who Posts This Much

Joined: 01 May 2003 Posts: 5333 City: Knoxville
|
Posted: Oct 13, 2003 4:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| i haven't gone behind an x-star, but when i went with murray in march, we only went like 9 mph and filled up the one side of the boat with all of the weights he had, so about 2000 or so on one side, try it and see if you can do it better |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DJew Jake Wakeboarder.com Freak


Joined: 17 Sep 2003 Posts: 3907 City: Toronto
|
Posted: Oct 13, 2003 5:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have heared the x-star cannot surf, it is a perfect wakeboat but just cannot surf _________________ They know what is what but they dono what is what they just strut. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
logan Wakeboarder.Commie


Joined: 30 Aug 2003 Posts: 1913 City: Jackson, CA
|
Posted: Oct 13, 2003 8:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
how about the Super Air Nautiques?? _________________
| Lop wrote: |
that is scary, i woke up with a boner and had to make sure ontrider wasn't standing around with a chainsaw... |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Xbrdr1 Outlaw

Joined: 28 Jan 2003 Posts: 161
|
Posted: Oct 14, 2003 3:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
Here's a 2000 XStar....no probs.
http://forums.wakeboarder.com/viewtopic.php?t=14441&highlight=
But you're probably talking about the pickle-fork 'edition'....haven't heard much surf action talk about that.
For the $cratch, it should have a button which puts the weight where it should for 'surf' setup....  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
projectely4 Addict


Joined: 18 Mar 2003 Posts: 633 City: Bradenton, Florida
|
Posted: Oct 14, 2003 8:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
i don't think it does well mainly because at all low speeds it is always plained off. _________________ pointless crew is so insane. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Xbrdr1 Outlaw

Joined: 28 Jan 2003 Posts: 161
|
Posted: Oct 14, 2003 8:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Suprisingly...we weren't able to get as much 'action' behind the SAN like we did the X. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
B T Lowe Newbie


Joined: 14 Jan 2003 Posts: 36 City: Palm Harbor, FL
|
Posted: Oct 14, 2003 8:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
| My guess is you're going too fast. Try 9.8 mph on Perfect Pass. That setting is ideal on my VLX. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dajur Criminal

Joined: 18 Aug 2003 Posts: 63 City: Grand Forks, ND (as*h0le of world)
|
Posted: Oct 14, 2003 10:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Volcom_wakeboarder, Every time you post you're telling everyone how great a SAN is. BUT DO YOU NOT EVEN OWN ONE? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
salmon_tacos Wakeboarder.Commie

Joined: 14 Jan 2003 Posts: 2498 City: Austin
|
Posted: Oct 14, 2003 10:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Does it matter? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
projectely4 Addict


Joined: 18 Mar 2003 Posts: 633 City: Bradenton, Florida
|
Posted: Oct 14, 2003 2:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i know this post was for an x-star not a san. i have tried alot maybe like 9 mph will work _________________ pointless crew is so insane. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
holdsworth PityDaFool Who Posts This Much

Joined: 01 May 2003 Posts: 5333 City: Knoxville
|
Posted: Oct 14, 2003 2:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| it should work but vary the PP at different speeds and see what makes the wake best |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BrtnDan Addict

Joined: 19 Feb 2003 Posts: 609
|
Posted: Oct 16, 2003 6:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Man, i would kill for a new X-star... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|