| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Nor*Cal Ladies Man


Joined: 12 Jan 2003 Posts: 9479 City: Sac
|
Posted: Apr 29, 2014 10:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
| brew wrote: | | chavez wrote: | | IMO the Feds should execute the terms of the court order and arrest Bundy for his obstruction. If Bundy fights back use appropriate levels of force to put it down. If that means rolling up there in a convoy of surplus MRAPs and countless LEOs, so be it. If Bundy and his "militia" are stupid enough to engage them, they can deal with the repercussions. |
Agree. You've got a bunch of militia that showed up just to fight the government. They don't care about the cause, just the fight. If this is allowed to go on, what's the next cause? I don't want to pay taxes any more, who's with me.
Okie, before anyone else answers one of your constant questions, I would like you to make a point and explain why you think Bundy is in the right here. I assume you agree with the land ownership issue now, so what's next. |
We didn't exactly evict occupy, but let them get bored and lose the spotlight. I would oppose a government use of force in this situation and think the militarization of our LEO is a serious societal problem. These militiamen are the rights Occupy but other than some anarchists in Oakland, the police were fairly non-interventionist about that whole issue and should be with this one. _________________ If I agreed with you we would both be wrong. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
eeven73 PityDaFool Who Posts This Much


Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Posts: 5377 City: Halfway
|
Posted: Apr 29, 2014 10:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
1.) No way that was written by "Charlie Delta"
2.) No way that guys name is "Charlie Delta" _________________ Is President Obama a Keynesian? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
brew Wakeboarder.com Freak

Joined: 09 Aug 2005 Posts: 2778 City: Jackson
|
Posted: Apr 29, 2014 1:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Nor*cal, I don't see the correlation. The government was exercising a court ordered forfeiture and a bunch of guys showed up with guns to stop it. This is no different than if your local PD is seizing your assets under court order and you and all your buddies show up with guns to stop it. Occupy isn't in the same discussion. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
chavez Ladies Man


Joined: 22 Sep 2003 Posts: 27375 City: Roseville
|
Posted: Apr 29, 2014 1:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| brew wrote: | | Nor*cal, I don't see the correlation. The government was exercising a court ordered forfeiture and a bunch of guys showed up with guns to stop it. This is no different than if your local PD is seizing your assets under court order and you and all your buddies show up with guns to stop it. Occupy isn't in the same discussion. |
Agreed. Also, Occupy was unarmed resistance. And the anarchists in the Bay have (at this point anyhow) only thrown rocks.
Bundy and his cronies have now committed a felony by obstructing the enforcement of the court order. They should be held accountable under the law, and the court order should be prosecuted. If for no other reason than to not make this a precedent to other nutbags out there. _________________
| Quote: | | That's Mr. Gingermex to you a$$hole. |
RIP MHL 04/25/1958 - 01/11/2006 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
eeven73 PityDaFool Who Posts This Much


Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Posts: 5377 City: Halfway
|
Posted: Apr 29, 2014 2:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
So you were A OK with the branch Davidian situation in Waco? _________________ Is President Obama a Keynesian? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
eeven73 PityDaFool Who Posts This Much


Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Posts: 5377 City: Halfway
|
Posted: Apr 29, 2014 2:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It is a shame that this situation is being used as a proxy for, "stand up against gov't over reach".
I have an acquaintance who is in the logging business who right now has his job site shutdown because of good old spotted owl. No joke.
All his equipment is stuck on sight because they had to stop work first thing and can't renter to get equipment to move to next job. Now his whole crew is applying for unemployment.
Anyone want to take a guess at how the Feds identify spotted owls?
By calling to them at night and hearing return call.
Here is the 42 page procedure document for how to call spotted owls.
http://www.fws.gov/yreka/ES/2012RevisedNSOprotocol-2-15-12.pdf
Guess what happens when 23 yr old fish and wildlife employee looking to make name for himself finds anytime he does night calls. _________________ Is President Obama a Keynesian? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
brew Wakeboarder.com Freak

Joined: 09 Aug 2005 Posts: 2778 City: Jackson
|
Posted: Apr 29, 2014 4:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
A Ok may be a stretch, but I don't see a point where I support armed resistance against valid court orders. I agree with the fact that they stopped this to regroup, but at some point they are going to have to go back to enforce the law.
The whole thing is a bunch of garbage and all the idiots coming out of the woodwork has been ridiculous. The former Sheriff Mack from Arizona has been quoted as saying they were going to make the women man the frontline so that it would be recorded showing our government killing women if it came to arms. That's about as far down the coward, anti-government totem pole as you can slide.
On your other issue, there are a bunch of cases like that need to be addressed and dealt with. There needs to be a more sensible resolution to these things. However, the guys like Bundy hurt the process. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Okie Boarder Ladies Man


Joined: 03 Mar 2008 Posts: 10056 City: Edmond
|
Posted: Apr 29, 2014 7:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| brew wrote: | | chavez wrote: | | IMO the Feds should execute the terms of the court order and arrest Bundy for his obstruction. If Bundy fights back use appropriate levels of force to put it down. If that means rolling up there in a convoy of surplus MRAPs and countless LEOs, so be it. If Bundy and his "militia" are stupid enough to engage them, they can deal with the repercussions. |
Agree. You've got a bunch of militia that showed up just to fight the government. They don't care about the cause, just the fight. If this is allowed to go on, what's the next cause? I don't want to pay taxes any more, who's with me.
Okie, before anyone else answers one of your constant questions, I would like you to make a point and explain why you think Bundy is in the right here. I assume you agree with the land ownership issue now, so what's next. |
The answer is what I already said regarding your question about what he is standing up for. I think he should be able to continue grazing his cattle to support his family. He has stuck with the original agreement that his family made with the state. I don't think the Fed should be able to arbitrarily changes the terms of that agreement. _________________ If love is blind, why is lingerie so popular? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jgriffith Wakeboarder.Commie

Joined: 21 Mar 2012 Posts: 1454 City: Boerne
|
Posted: Apr 29, 2014 7:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Okie Boarder, Im curious, what do you think the word arbitrary means?
What agreement did his family make with the state, and when was that agreement made? Please explain the specific terms of this agreement you refer to. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
brew Wakeboarder.com Freak

Joined: 09 Aug 2005 Posts: 2778 City: Jackson
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Okie Boarder Ladies Man


Joined: 03 Mar 2008 Posts: 10056 City: Edmond
|
Posted: Apr 30, 2014 4:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'll respond when I can sit in front of a computer and pull some links into my response...probably a day or two when I'm back home. _________________ If love is blind, why is lingerie so popular? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
brew Wakeboarder.com Freak

Joined: 09 Aug 2005 Posts: 2778 City: Jackson
|
Posted: Apr 30, 2014 5:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
Don't waste your time. You aren't going to post anything that convinces anyone you or he has a leg to stand on and we clearly aren't going to convince you either. There isn't a reputable source anywhere that is going to support his claim.
I'm dealing with an issue with State government now. I bought a property 5 years ago with 4 single family homes on it. The State has now come in and said that we can't have occupants in two of them because the lot size isn't large enough to support the septic system and field lines. We have to purchase land adjoining the property and put in an additional tank and field lines. This was approved through all the proper channels when it was built. I'm going to court on it and I'm sure I'll lose. Can everyone bring their guns and keep the state from evicting half my tenants at that point? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jgriffith Wakeboarder.Commie

Joined: 21 Mar 2012 Posts: 1454 City: Boerne
|
Posted: Apr 30, 2014 5:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Slumlord! Your tenants have a god given natural right to a proper septic system...buy the land and install a new septic system. You also have no right to "arbitrarily" raise their rent after you fix what is rightfully theirs. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
chavez Ladies Man


Joined: 22 Sep 2003 Posts: 27375 City: Roseville
|
Posted: Apr 30, 2014 6:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Okie Boarder wrote: | | The answer is what I already said regarding your question about what he is standing up for. I think he should be able to continue grazing his cattle to support his family. He has stuck with the original agreement that his family made with the state. I don't think the Fed should be able to arbitrarily changes the terms of that agreement. |
Here's the thing... He has had his opportunity to due process. He went to court. He lost. He appealed. He lost again.
He doesn't get to just do what he wants. He has to play by the rules. He felt the rules were incorrect. He took his matter before a court. The courts disagreed with him. GAME OVER.
Nobody, and I mean NOBODY is above the court order. We have a system like this in place for a reason, and for him, it did not work in his favor.
brew, given what Okie and the Bundy types believe, yes. _________________
| Quote: | | That's Mr. Gingermex to you a$$hole. |
RIP MHL 04/25/1958 - 01/11/2006 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
brew Wakeboarder.com Freak

Joined: 09 Aug 2005 Posts: 2778 City: Jackson
|
Posted: Apr 30, 2014 6:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
All the Constitution and anti government guys jumped on this to fight the fight not for the cause. I'm going to use the gayest possible reference here to make my point. For any of you that have wives that forced you to watch the last Twilight movie, it's like the Dracula looking guys that showed up for the fight just because of who the other side was.
Okie, the fundamental problem here is you don't have a right to use what is not yours and there are agreements that cover federal and state owned lands. There are a lot of old deals in place on Western grazing rights, but all of this has long since been settled. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RampageWake Wakeboarder.Commie

Joined: 23 Jul 2003 Posts: 2002 City: Houston
|
Posted: Apr 30, 2014 7:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
| brew wrote: |
I'm dealing with an issue with State government now. I bought a property 5 years ago with 4 single family homes on it. The State has now come in and said that we can't have occupants in two of them because the lot size isn't large enough to support the septic system and field lines. We have to purchase land adjoining the property and put in an additional tank and field lines. This was approved through all the proper channels when it was built. I'm going to court on it and I'm sure I'll lose. Can everyone bring their guns and keep the state from evicting half my tenants at that point? |
Obviously, codes vary from state to state, but is it not possible to upgrade the existing (likely anaerobic system) to a newer aerobic style system that complies? Often, here in TX they can install a special system designed for small lots that uses drip irrigation instead of the standard sprinklers... Just thinking out loud.
</hijack> - oh who am I kidding, this thread was jacked a looong time ago!  _________________
| Rhawn wrote: | You should have a less retarded friend read over your posts before you hit "Submit"
|
RIP M.H.Legge |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
brew Wakeboarder.com Freak

Joined: 09 Aug 2005 Posts: 2778 City: Jackson
|
Posted: Apr 30, 2014 8:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
Don't know. I've turned it over to my real estate attorney's to deal with. The state says that you can only have 2 2 bedroom units per septic tank and 500 ft of fieldlines. We have 4 3 bedroom units on one tank with additional field lines. It was built this way, all work was approved by the county and state, etc. and that's the way we bought it.
The property has been full for 10+ years with no issues. We have had a ridiculous amount of rain over the last 6 months, the water table became too saturated and we had some issues last fall with the fieldlines. Instead of my $hithead tenants calling us about the problem, they called the county. Enter 23 year old inspector new to the job and now the game changes. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
eeven73 PityDaFool Who Posts This Much


Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Posts: 5377 City: Halfway
|
Posted: Apr 30, 2014 8:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | Enter 23 year old inspector new to the job and now the game changes. |
lets kill all 23 year olds. Problem solved
 _________________ Is President Obama a Keynesian? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DRAGON88 Ladies Man


Joined: 12 Jan 2003 Posts: 8213 City: Portland, OR
|
Posted: Apr 30, 2014 9:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
| brew wrote: | | Don't waste your time. You aren't going to post anything that convinces anyone you or he has a leg to stand on and we clearly aren't going to convince you either. There isn't a reputable source anywhere that is going to support his claim. |
I know my participation here has been spotty for the last few years, but isn't this approach par for the course? _________________ wakeboards
wakeboarding |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
brew Wakeboarder.com Freak

Joined: 09 Aug 2005 Posts: 2778 City: Jackson
|
Posted: Apr 30, 2014 9:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
| eeven73 wrote: | | Quote: | | Enter 23 year old inspector new to the job and now the game changes. |
lets kill all 23 year olds. Problem solved
 |
Based on the one's that work for me I support this resolution. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
brew Wakeboarder.com Freak

Joined: 09 Aug 2005 Posts: 2778 City: Jackson
|
Posted: Apr 30, 2014 9:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
| DRAGON88 wrote: | | brew wrote: | | Don't waste your time. You aren't going to post anything that convinces anyone you or he has a leg to stand on and we clearly aren't going to convince you either. There isn't a reputable source anywhere that is going to support his claim. |
I know my participation here has been spotty for the last few years, but isn't this approach par for the course? |
Do you mean in general or with Okie specifically? In general, no there are a lot of informed discussions on message boards where both sides have points. With okie, especially lately and on this specific topic, yes |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jryoung Ladies Man


Joined: 19 Mar 2004 Posts: 7664 City: Man Jose
|
Posted: Apr 30, 2014 12:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| brew wrote: |
The property has been full for 10+ years with no issues. We have had a ridiculous amount of rain over the last 6 months, the water table became too saturated and we had some issues last fall with the fieldlines. Instead of my $hithead tenants calling us about the problem, they called the county. Enter 23 year old inspector new to the job and now the game changes. |
Call Lcap he knows how to handle $hitty situations with the county.
Sadly, I am dealing with one right now. Mrs. Inspector says our homesite is not a good site for the new alternative septic systems. Those systems were designed for hilly properties with property line and or water/spring constraints and we have a hilly property with property line and a spring.
So far it has only cost us an additional $2,500 in fees and however much a lawyer is going to cost to review our facts and circumstances to determine if we have a case. _________________
| Quote: | | You don't meet many old vegans. It's mostly young priviliged kids trying to figure out where they stand in the world. | - Steve Rinella |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
chavez Ladies Man


Joined: 22 Sep 2003 Posts: 27375 City: Roseville
|
Posted: Apr 30, 2014 1:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
jryoung, that's just wonderful. Your freaking house burns down, and they are going to give you a hard time about the replacement septic? What a$$holes. I hope you get a variance without hassle. _________________
| Quote: | | That's Mr. Gingermex to you a$$hole. |
RIP MHL 04/25/1958 - 01/11/2006 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Okie Boarder Ladies Man


Joined: 03 Mar 2008 Posts: 10056 City: Edmond
|
Posted: May 01, 2014 7:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| jgriffith wrote: | Okie Boarder, Im curious, what do you think the word arbitrary means?
What agreement did his family make with the state, and when was that agreement made? Please explain the specific terms of this agreement you refer to. |
Still looking...when I was researching this before, I remember coming across it, but haven't been able to find it again. I know his family came on to the land in the late 1800's and some time after that they established the agreement for grazing on the land. _________________ If love is blind, why is lingerie so popular? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
brew Wakeboarder.com Freak

Joined: 09 Aug 2005 Posts: 2778 City: Jackson
|
Posted: May 01, 2014 7:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| The Taylor Grazing Act was established in 1934 to govern grazing on all federal land not just this piece. Before, it was wide open, first come, first serve. This put a usage structure in place. It did not take his family land away from him. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Okie Boarder Ladies Man


Joined: 03 Mar 2008 Posts: 10056 City: Edmond
|
Posted: May 02, 2014 3:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
I seem to recall reading about an earlier agreement and that's what I'm still looking for. _________________ If love is blind, why is lingerie so popular? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jgriffith Wakeboarder.Commie

Joined: 21 Mar 2012 Posts: 1454 City: Boerne
|
Posted: May 02, 2014 3:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Okie Boarder wrote: | | I seem to recall reading about an earlier agreement and that's what I'm still looking for. |
You recall reading about an earlier agreement? Um so do I...in this forum, that doesnt make it true though |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
fish6942 Addict

Joined: 22 Feb 2006 Posts: 603
|
Posted: May 02, 2014 5:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Okie Boarder wrote: | | I seem to recall reading about an earlier agreement and that's what I'm still looking for. |
Do you recall this being a lifetime agreement? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jgriffith Wakeboarder.Commie

Joined: 21 Mar 2012 Posts: 1454 City: Boerne
|
Posted: May 02, 2014 5:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
| fish6942 wrote: | | Okie Boarder wrote: | | I seem to recall reading about an earlier agreement and that's what I'm still looking for. |
Do you recall this being a eternalagreement? |
Fify |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jgriffith Wakeboarder.Commie

Joined: 21 Mar 2012 Posts: 1454 City: Boerne
|
Posted: May 02, 2014 5:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
| jgriffith wrote: | | fish6942 wrote: | | Okie Boarder wrote: | | I seem to recall reading about an earlier agreement and that's what I'm still looking for. |
Do you recall this being an eternal agreement? |
Fify |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jryoung Ladies Man


Joined: 19 Mar 2004 Posts: 7664 City: Man Jose
|
Posted: May 02, 2014 5:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Okie Boarder wrote: | | I seem to recall reading about an earlier agreement and that's what I'm still looking for. |
Grazing permits are typically good for 10 years. I've looked but can't find any specifics as to where he was in his permit cycle. _________________
| Quote: | | You don't meet many old vegans. It's mostly young priviliged kids trying to figure out where they stand in the world. | - Steve Rinella |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jryoung Ladies Man


Joined: 19 Mar 2004 Posts: 7664 City: Man Jose
|
Posted: May 02, 2014 6:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
This was a timely arbitrary rate increase. Maybe I should just let my stuff hand out there and end up on an episode of storage wars.
 _________________
| Quote: | | You don't meet many old vegans. It's mostly young priviliged kids trying to figure out where they stand in the world. | - Steve Rinella |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
brew Wakeboarder.com Freak

Joined: 09 Aug 2005 Posts: 2778 City: Jackson
|
Posted: May 02, 2014 11:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Okie Boarder wrote: | | I seem to recall reading about an earlier agreement and that's what I'm still looking for. |
Earlier than what? The Taylor Act formalized all grazing agreements. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Nor*Cal Ladies Man


Joined: 12 Jan 2003 Posts: 9479 City: Sac
|
Posted: May 05, 2014 9:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
| chavez wrote: | | brew wrote: | | Nor*cal, I don't see the correlation. The government was exercising a court ordered forfeiture and a bunch of guys showed up with guns to stop it. This is no different than if your local PD is seizing your assets under court order and you and all your buddies show up with guns to stop it. Occupy isn't in the same discussion. |
Agreed. Also, Occupy was unarmed resistance. And the anarchists in the Bay have (at this point anyhow) only thrown rocks. |
And molotov cocktails... And shut down the port...
It's all anti-govt just different side of the political spectrum. However, your perspective elevates one over the other... When clearly it's extremism from both sides. That's all I'm saying. _________________ If I agreed with you we would both be wrong. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Nor*Cal Ladies Man


Joined: 12 Jan 2003 Posts: 9479 City: Sac
|
Posted: May 05, 2014 9:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
jryoung, have you contacted your councilmember? They usually have staff just for constituent issues. I'd even elevate it to Assemblymember and Senator staff if there is no resolution... Highlight how 'green' this new system is... There's pending and ongoing issues at the state and regional water boards on septic systems that could be leveraged to have some calls made from an elected office to Mrs. Inspectors boss, to free up this issue. _________________ If I agreed with you we would both be wrong. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|