Wakeboarder Forum Index

 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   StatisticsStats   FavoritesFavorites   RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages  Log inLog in 
BlogsBlogs   

Heavy cell phone use tied to poor sperm quality

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Wakeboarder Forum Index -> Non-Wakeboarding
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Dragonlady8
Black Widow
Black Widow


Joined: 27 Aug 2004
Posts: 9198

PostPosted: Feb 06, 2008 7:32 pm    Post subject: Heavy cell phone use tied to poor sperm quality Reply with quote

So yak away Boys...... Laughing Laughing


Heavy cell phone use tied to poor sperm quality
Men who talked more than 4 hours a day had lowest counts, study says
Reuters
updated 1:48 p.m. ET, Wed., Feb. 6, 2008
NEW YORK - Spending hours on a cell phone each day may affect the quality of a man’s sperm, preliminary research suggests.

In a study of 361 men seen at their infertility clinic, researchers at the Cleveland Clinic found an association between the patients’ cell phone use and their sperm quality.

On average, the more hours the men spent on their cell phones each day, the lower their sperm count and the greater their percentage of abnormal sperm.

The findings, published in the journal Fertility and Sterility, add to questions about the potential health effects of cell phones and other wireless devices. Some studies, for example, have linked long-term cell phone use to a higher risk of brain tumors, though many other studies have found no such connection.

The concern is that, over time, the electromagnetic energy emitted from mobile phones could theoretically harm body tissue — by damaging DNA, for example.

However, the new findings do not prove that cell phones somehow damage sperm, according to the researchers.

“Our results show a strong association of cell phone use with decreased semen quality. However, they do not prove a cause-and- effect relationship,” lead researcher Dr. Ashok Agarwal told Reuters Health.

He and his colleagues based their findings on semen samples from 361 men who came to their infertility clinic over one year. All of the men were questioned about their cell phone habits.

In general, the researchers found, sperm count and sperm quality tended to decline as daily cell phone hours increased. Men who said they used their phones for more than four hours each day had the lowest average sperm count and the fewest normal, viable sperm.

“We infer from our results that heavy cell phone use ... is associated with a lower semen quality,” Agarwal said. But whether cell phones somehow directly affect men’s fertility is not clear.

Agarwal said he and his colleagues have two studies underway aiming to shed light on the issue. In one, they are exposing semen samples to electromagnetic radiation from cell phones to see what, if any, effects occur.

The second is a follow-up to the current study that is assessing a larger group of men. Agarwal said this study is more rigorously designed and will account for certain other factors like lifestyle habits and occupational exposures that might affect sperm quality.

URL: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23033163/

_________________
[quote="Swass"] 8824, dude - I suck. You were right.[/quote].
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
finkle
Wakeboarder.com Freak
Wakeboarder.com Freak


Joined: 22 Sep 2003
Posts: 4067

PostPosted: Feb 07, 2008 10:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

looks like I'm in the clear. I have a digital wireless phone. Who even uses those "cellular" phones these days anyway? Wink
_________________
Best Quote Ever wrote:
'No regrets', that's my motto.....well, that and 'everybody wang chung tonight'
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ontrider
Ladies Man
Ladies Man


Joined: 30 Jul 2003
Posts: 16491
City: Russia

PostPosted: Feb 07, 2008 10:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Who talks with their balls? Confused
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Blog
kavlock99
Wakeboarder.Commie
Wakeboarder.Commie


Joined: 06 Feb 2004
Posts: 1214
City: St. Louis

PostPosted: Feb 07, 2008 10:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

ontrider wrote:
Who talks with their balls? Confused


Peter Griffin. They're on his chin.


_________________
(0OO \ (||||)(||||) / OO0)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Broccoli B
Wakeboarder.com Freak
Wakeboarder.com Freak


Joined: 12 Jul 2003
Posts: 2670
City: Grand Rapids

PostPosted: Feb 07, 2008 10:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

he's a ballchinian.
_________________
Brent B
jt09 wrote:
don't assume what you think i assume. you would assume wrong.


lcap wrote:
you assume that i assume that my assuming is wrong and assume your assumption therefore must be correct.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
boardordie
Wakeboarder.Commie
Wakeboarder.Commie


Joined: 02 Sep 2004
Posts: 1038
City: Piqua/Ohio

PostPosted: Feb 07, 2008 10:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Haven't see anyone talk with their balls. I have seen plenty talk out of their A$$ though! Laughing
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Ohioboarder
Addict
Addict


Joined: 18 Aug 2005
Posts: 520
City: Over there

PostPosted: Feb 07, 2008 12:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Stop sitting your phone in your lap while talking on speaker phone.
_________________
MMMM... COFFEE
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Hollywood
PityDaFool Who Posts This Much
PityDaFool Who Posts This Much


Joined: 01 Oct 2003
Posts: 5601
City: Door Knob

PostPosted: Feb 07, 2008 1:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Good, I'll keep chatting it up so I don't have to wear a condom having sex with my wife.
_________________
dizzlestoy wrote:
Dumb question... What is "Bubb Rubbing" I googled it and wakeboarder.com came up.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
DJew Jake
Wakeboarder.com Freak
Wakeboarder.com Freak


Joined: 17 Sep 2003
Posts: 3907
City: Toronto

PostPosted: Feb 07, 2008 1:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Study is only 361 trials hardly proves anything.
_________________
They know what is what but they dono what is what they just strut.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Wakeboarder Forum Index -> Non-Wakeboarding All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

Add To Favorites

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
             


Copyright © 2012 - Wakeboarding - Wakeboarder.com - All Right Reserved
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group